Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Index by author

January 01, 2020; Volume 41,Issue 1
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

  1. Brekenfeld, C.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia Is a Tolerable Risk in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy
      F. Flottmann, H. Leischner, G. Broocks, T.D. Faizy, A. Aigner, M. Deb-Chatterji, G. Thomalla, J. Krauel, M. Issleib, J. Fiehler and C. Brekenfeld
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 122-127; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6321
  2. Brinjikji, W.

    1. Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
      Open Access
      Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls
      D.K. Kim, W. Brinjikji, P.P. Morris, F.E. Diehn, V.T. Lehman, G.B. Liebo, J.M. Morris, J.T. Verdoorn, J.K. Cutsforth-Gregory, R.I. Farb, J.C Benson and C.M. Carr
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 21-28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6368
  3. Broocks, G.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia Is a Tolerable Risk in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy
      F. Flottmann, H. Leischner, G. Broocks, T.D. Faizy, A. Aigner, M. Deb-Chatterji, G. Thomalla, J. Krauel, M. Issleib, J. Fiehler and C. Brekenfeld
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 122-127; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6321
  4. Byrne, D.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      You have access
      Prediction of Hemorrhage after Successful Recanalization in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Improved Risk Stratification Using Dual-Energy CT Parenchymal Iodine Concentration Ratio Relative to the Superior Sagittal Sinus
      D. Byrne, J.P. Walsh, H. Schmiedeskamp, F. Settecase, M.K.S. Heran, B. Niu, A.K. Salmeen, B. Rohr, T.S. Field, N. Murray and A. Rohr
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 64-70; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6345

      The authors evaluated whether, in acute ischemic stroke, iodine concentration within contrast-stained parenchyma compared with an internal reference in the superior sagittal sinus on dual-energy CT could predict subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage in 71 patients. Forty-three of 71 patients had parenchymal hyperdensity on initial dual-energy CT. The median relative iodine concentration compared with the superior sagittal sinus was significantly higher in those with subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage (137.9% versus 109.2%). They conclude that in dual-energy CT performed within 1 hour following thrombectomy that the relative iodine concentration within contrast-stained brain parenchyma compared with that in the superior sagittal sinus was a more reliable predictor of ICH compared with the absolute maximum iodine concentration.

  5. Cagnazzo, F.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBNeurointervention
      You have access
      Flow-Diversion Treatment for Unruptured Nonsaccular Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior and Distal Anterior Circulation: A Meta-Analysis
      F. Cagnazzo, P.-H. Lefevre, I. Derraz, C. Dargazanli, G. Gascou, D.T. di Carlo, P. Perrini, R. Ahmed, J.F. Hak, C. Riquelme, A. Bonafe and V. Costalat
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 134-139; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6352

      The authors’ aim was to analyze the outcomes after flow diversion among nonsaccular unruptured lesions. Fifteen studies (213 aneurysms) were included in the analysis. The long-term adequate occlusion rate was 85.3%. Treatment-related complications were 17.4%. Overall, 15% were ischemic events. They conclude that unruptured nonsaccular aneurysms located in the posterior and distal anterior circulations can be effectively treated with a flow-diversion strategy. Nevertheless, treatment-related complications are not negligible, with about 15% ischemic events and 8% morbidity. Larger size (>10 mm) significantly increased the risk of procedure-related adverse events among nonsaccular lesions.

  6. Carpenter, J.S.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICENeurointervention
      Open Access
      Does Increasing Packing Density Using Larger Caliber Coils Improve Angiographic Results of Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms at 1 Year: A Randomized Trial
      J. Raymond, J. Ghostine, B.A. van Adel, J.J.S. Shankar, D. Iancu, A.P. Mitha, P. Kvamme, R.D. Turner, A. Turk, V. Mendes-Pereira, J.S. Carpenter, S. Boo, A. Evans, H.H. Woo, D. Fiorella, A. Alaraj, D. Roy, A. Weill, P. Lavoie, M. Chagnon, T.N. Nguyen, J.L. Rempel and T.E. Darsaut
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 29-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6362

      Does Embolization with Larger Coils Lead to Better Treatment of Aneurysms (DELTA) was an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients had 4- to 12-mm unruptured aneurysms. Treatment allocation to either 15- (experimental group) or 10-caliber coils (control group) was randomized 1:1 using a Web-based platform. The primary efficacy outcome was a major recurrence or a residual aneurysm at follow-up angiography at 12 ± 2 months adjudicated by an independent core lab blinded to the treatment allocation. The trial was stopped after 210 patients were recruited between November 2013 and June 2017 when funding was interrupted. On an intent-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome was reached in 37 patients allocated to 15-caliber coils and 36 patients allocated to 10-caliber coils. Safety and other clinical outcomes were similar. Coiling of aneurysms randomized to 15-caliber coils achieved higher packing densities compared with 10-caliber coils, but this had no impact on the angiographic outcomes at 1 year, which were primarily driven by aneurysm size and initial angiographic results.

  7. Carr, C.M.

    1. Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
      Open Access
      Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls
      D.K. Kim, W. Brinjikji, P.P. Morris, F.E. Diehn, V.T. Lehman, G.B. Liebo, J.M. Morris, J.T. Verdoorn, J.K. Cutsforth-Gregory, R.I. Farb, J.C Benson and C.M. Carr
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 21-28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6368
  8. Carter, N.S.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
      You have access
      Number Needed to Treat with Vertebral Augmentation to Save a Life
      J.A. Hirsch, R.V. Chandra, N.S. Carter, D. Beall, M. Frohbergh and K. Ong
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 178-182; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6367

      The purpose of this study was to calculate the number needed to treat to save 1 life at 1 year and up to 5 years after vertebral augmentation. A 10-year sample of the 100% US Medicare data base was used to identify patients with vertebral compression fractures treated with nonsurgical management, balloon kyphoplasty, and vertebroplasty. The number needed to treat was calculated between augmentation and nonsurgical management groups from years 1–5 following a vertebral compression fracture diagnosis, using survival probabilities for each management approach. The adjusted number needed to treat to save 1 life for nonsurgical management versus kyphoplasty ranged from 14.8 at year 1 to 11.9 at year 5. The adjusted number needed to treat for nonsurgical management versus vertebroplasty ranged from 22.8 at year 1 to 23.8 at year 5. The authors conclude that the NNT analysis of more than 2 million patients with VCF reveals that only 15 patients need to be treated to save 1 life at 1 year. This has an obvious clinically significant impact and given that all augmentation clinical trials are underpowered to detect a mortality benefit, this large dataset analysis reveals that vertebral augmentation provides a significant mortality benefit over nonsurgical management with a low NNT.

  9. Chagnon, M.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICENeurointervention
      Open Access
      Does Increasing Packing Density Using Larger Caliber Coils Improve Angiographic Results of Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms at 1 Year: A Randomized Trial
      J. Raymond, J. Ghostine, B.A. van Adel, J.J.S. Shankar, D. Iancu, A.P. Mitha, P. Kvamme, R.D. Turner, A. Turk, V. Mendes-Pereira, J.S. Carpenter, S. Boo, A. Evans, H.H. Woo, D. Fiorella, A. Alaraj, D. Roy, A. Weill, P. Lavoie, M. Chagnon, T.N. Nguyen, J.L. Rempel and T.E. Darsaut
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 29-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6362

      Does Embolization with Larger Coils Lead to Better Treatment of Aneurysms (DELTA) was an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients had 4- to 12-mm unruptured aneurysms. Treatment allocation to either 15- (experimental group) or 10-caliber coils (control group) was randomized 1:1 using a Web-based platform. The primary efficacy outcome was a major recurrence or a residual aneurysm at follow-up angiography at 12 ± 2 months adjudicated by an independent core lab blinded to the treatment allocation. The trial was stopped after 210 patients were recruited between November 2013 and June 2017 when funding was interrupted. On an intent-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome was reached in 37 patients allocated to 15-caliber coils and 36 patients allocated to 10-caliber coils. Safety and other clinical outcomes were similar. Coiling of aneurysms randomized to 15-caliber coils achieved higher packing densities compared with 10-caliber coils, but this had no impact on the angiographic outcomes at 1 year, which were primarily driven by aneurysm size and initial angiographic results.

  10. Chandra, R.V.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
      You have access
      Number Needed to Treat with Vertebral Augmentation to Save a Life
      J.A. Hirsch, R.V. Chandra, N.S. Carter, D. Beall, M. Frohbergh and K. Ong
      American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 178-182; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6367

      The purpose of this study was to calculate the number needed to treat to save 1 life at 1 year and up to 5 years after vertebral augmentation. A 10-year sample of the 100% US Medicare data base was used to identify patients with vertebral compression fractures treated with nonsurgical management, balloon kyphoplasty, and vertebroplasty. The number needed to treat was calculated between augmentation and nonsurgical management groups from years 1–5 following a vertebral compression fracture diagnosis, using survival probabilities for each management approach. The adjusted number needed to treat to save 1 life for nonsurgical management versus kyphoplasty ranged from 14.8 at year 1 to 11.9 at year 5. The adjusted number needed to treat for nonsurgical management versus vertebroplasty ranged from 22.8 at year 1 to 23.8 at year 5. The authors conclude that the NNT analysis of more than 2 million patients with VCF reveals that only 15 patients need to be treated to save 1 life at 1 year. This has an obvious clinically significant impact and given that all augmentation clinical trials are underpowered to detect a mortality benefit, this large dataset analysis reveals that vertebral augmentation provides a significant mortality benefit over nonsurgical management with a low NNT.

« Previous (Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26) Next »
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 41 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 41, Issue 1
1 Jan 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Advertisement
  • Letters
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire