Emerging Use of Ultra-High-Field 7T MRI in the Study of Intracranial Vascularity: State of the Field and Future Directions

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Balchandani P,
   2. Naidich TP

   . Ultra-high-field MR neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1204–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4180 pmid:25523591

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Wrede KH,
   2. Dammann P,
   3. Mönninghoff C, et al

   . Non-enhanced MR imaging of cerebral aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e84562 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084562 pmid:24400100

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Deistung A,
   2. Rauscher A,
   3. Sedlacik J, et al

   . Susceptibility weighted imaging at ultra high magnetic field strengths: theoretical considerations and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1155–68 doi:10.1002/mrm.21754 pmid:18956467

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Grabner G,
   2. Kiesel B,
   3. Wöhrer A, et al

   . Local image variance of 7 Tesla SWI is a new technique for preoperative characterization of diffusely infiltrating gliomas: correlation with tumour grade and IDH1 mutational status. Eur Radiol 2017;27:1556–67 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4451-y pmid:27300198

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Brat DJ,
   2. Van Meir EG

   . Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation orchestrated by VPF/VEGF: a new world of angiogenesis research. Am J Pathol 2001;158:789–96 doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64025-4 pmid:11238026

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Brem S

   . The role of vascular proliferation in the growth of brain tumors. Clin Neurosurg 1976;23:440–43 pmid:975695

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Moenninghoff C,
   2. Maderwald S,
   3. Theysohn JM, et al

   . Imaging of adult astrocytic brain tumours with 7T MRI: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2010;20:704–13 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1592-2 pmid:19763581

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Paek SL,
   2. Chung YS,
   3. Paek SH, et al

   . Early experience of pre- and post-contrast 7.0T MRI in brain tumors. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28:1362–72 doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1362 pmid:24015044

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Christoforidis GA,
   2. Yang M,
   3. Abduljalil A, et al

   . “Tumoral pseudoblush” identified within gliomas at high-spatial-resolution ultrahigh-field-strength gradient-echo MR imaging corresponds to microvascularity at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 2012;264:210–17 doi:10.1148/radiol.12110799 pmid:22627600

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Barrett TF,
    2. Dyvorne HA,
    3. Padormo F, et al

    . First application of 7-T magnetic resonance imaging in endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors. World Neurosurg 2017;103:600–10 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.088 pmid:28359922

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Regnery S,
    2. Knowles BR,
    3. Paech D, et al

    . High-resolution FLAIR MRI at 7 Tesla for treatment planning in glioblastoma patients. Radiother Oncol 2019;130:180–84 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.002 pmid:30177373

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Radbruch A,
    2. Eidel O,
    3. Wiestler B, et al

    . Quantification of tumor vessels in glioblastoma patients using time-of-flight angiography at 7 Tesla: a feasibility study. PLoS One 2014;9:e110727 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110727 pmid:25415327

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Wen PY,
    2. Kesari S

    . Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med 2008;359:492–507 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0708126 pmid:18669428

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Emblem KE,
    2. Mouridsen K,
    3. Bjornerud A, et al

    . Vessel architectural imaging identifies cancer patient responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Med 2013;19:1178 doi:10.1038/nm.3289 pmid:23955713

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Monninghoff C,
    2. Maderwald S,
    3. Theysohn JM, et al

    . Imaging of brain metastases of bronchial carcinomas with 7T MRI: initial results. Rofo 2010;182:764–72 doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245440 pmid:20544578

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Nobauer-Huhmann IM,
    2. Ba-Ssalamah A,
    3. Mlynarik V, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2002;37:114–19 doi:10.1097/00004424-200203000-00003 pmid:11882790

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. de Rotte AA,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Rutgers D, et al

    . Feasibility of high-resolution pituitary MRI at 7.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2005–11 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3230-x pmid:24871334

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Song SW,
    2. Son YD,
    3. Cho Z-H, et al

    . Experience with 7.0 T MRI in patients with supratentorial meningiomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2016;59:405–09 doi:10.3340/jkns.2016.59.4.405 pmid:27446524

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Belliveau JG,
    2. Bauman GS,
    3. Tay KY, et al

    . Initial investigation into microbleeds and white matter signal changes following radiotherapy for low-grade and benign brain tumors using ultra-high-field MRI techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2251–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5395 pmid:28970242

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Lupo JM,
    2. Chuang CF,
    3. Chang SM, et al

    . 7-Tesla susceptibility-weighted imaging to assess the effects of radiotherapy on normal-appearing brain in patients with glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:e493–500 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.046 pmid:22000750

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Morrison MA,
    2. Hess CP,
    3. Clarke JL, et al

    . Risk factors of radiotherapy-induced cerebral microbleeds and serial analysis of their size compared with white matter changes: a 7T MRI study in 113 adult patients with brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:868–77 doi:10.1002/jmri.26651 pmid:30663150

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Nandigam RN,
    2. Viswanathan A,
    3. Delgado P, et al

    . MR imaging detection of cerebral microbleeds: effect of susceptibility-weighted imaging, section thickness, and field strength. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:338–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1355 pmid:19001544

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Bian W,
    2. Hess CP,
    3. Chang SM, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging of radiation therapy-induced cerebral microbleeds in patients with glioma: a comparison between 3T and 7T. Neuroradiology 2014;56:91–96 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1297-8 pmid:24281386

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Grabner G,
    2. Nobauer I,
    3. Elandt K, et al

    . Longitudinal brain imaging of five malignant glioma patients treated with bevacizumab using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 7T. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:139–47 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.08.004 pmid:21982163

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Rondinoni C,
    2. Magnun C,
    3. Vallota da Silva A, et al

    . Epilepsy under the scope of ultra-high field MRI. Epilepsy Behav 2019 Jul 10. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.06.010 pmid:31300381

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Bertalanffy H,
    2. Benes L,
    3. Miyazawa T, et al

    . Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Review of the literature and analysis of 72 surgically treated patients. Neurosurg Rev 2002;25:1–53; discussion 54–55 pmid:11954761

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Rosenow F,
    2. Alonso-Vanegas MA,
    3. Baumgartner C, et al

    . Cavernoma-Related Epilepsy: Review and Recommendations for Management—Report of the Surgical Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2013;54:2025–35 doi:10.1111/epi.12402 pmid:24134485

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Ryvlin P,
    2. Mauguière F,
    3. Sindou M, et al

    . Interictal cerebral metabolism and epilepsy in cavernous angiomas. Brain 1995;118:677–87 doi:10.1093/brain/118.3.677 pmid:7600085

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Englot DJ,
    2. Han SJ,
    3. Lawton MT, et al

    . Predictors of seizure freedom in the surgical treatment of supratentorial cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1169–74 doi:10.3171/2011.7.JNS11536 pmid:21819194

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Leeman-Markowski B

    . Review of MRI-negative epilepsy. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1377 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3698

    CrossRef
31. 31.↵
    1. Schlamann M,
    2. Maderwald S,
    3. Becker W, et al

    . Cerebral cavernous hemangiomas at 7 Tesla: initial experience. Acad Radiology 2010;17:3–6 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.001 pmid:19910215

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Pinker K,
    2. Stavrou I,
    3. Szomolanyi P, et al

    . Improved preoperative evaluation of cerebral cavernomas by high-field, high-resolution susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison with standard (1.5 T) magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with histopathological findings: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2007;42:346–51 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000262744.85397.fc pmid:17507804

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Feldman RE,
    2. Delman BN,
    3. Pawha PS, et al

    . 7T MRI in epilepsy patients with previously normal clinical MRI exams compared against healthy controls. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213642 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213642 pmid:30889199

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Colon AJ,
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Buijs M, et al

    . Detection superiority of 7 T MRI protocol in patients with epilepsy and suspected focal cortical dysplasia. Acta Neurol Belg 2016;116:259–69 doi:10.1007/s13760-016-0662-x pmid:27389578

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Baumann CR,
    2. Schuknecht B,
    3. Lo Russo G, et al

    . Seizure outcome after resection of cavernous malformations is better when surrounding hemosiderin-stained brain also is removed. Epilepsia 2006;47:563–66 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00468.x pmid:16529622

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Yeon JY,
    2. Kim JS,
    3. Choi SJ, et al

    . Supratentorial cavernous angiomas presenting with seizures: surgical outcomes in 60 consecutive patients. Seizure 2009;18:14–20 doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2008.05.010 pmid:18656386

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Vlak MH,
    2. Algra A,
    3. Brandenburg R, et al

    . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Umutlu L,
    2. Theysohn N,
    3. Maderwald S, et al

    . 7 Tesla MPRAGE imaging of the intracranial arterial vasculature: nonenhanced versus contrast-enhanced. Acad Radiol 2013;20:628–34 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.012 pmid:23473725

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Vergouwen MDI,
    2. Backes D,
    3. van der Schaaf IC, et al

    . Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall in unruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability: a follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1112 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6105

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. van der Kolk AG,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Brundel M, et al

    . Multi-sequence whole-brain intracranial vessel wall imaging at 7.0 tesla. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2996–3004 doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2905-z pmid:23736375

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Sato T,
    2. Matsushige T,
    3. Chen B, et al

    . Wall contrast enhancement of thrombosed intracranial aneurysms at 7T MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1106–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6084 pmid:31147351

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Wrede KH,
    2. Matsushige T,
    3. Goericke SL, et al

    . Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2017;27:354–64 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4323-5 pmid:26993650

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Zhu C, et al

    . Wall enhancement of intracranial saccular and fusiform aneurysms may differ in intensity and extension: a pilot study using 7-T high-resolution black-blood MRI. Eur Radiol 2019 Jun 19. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06275-9 pmid:31218429

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Blankena R,
    2. Kleinloog R,
    3. Verweij BH, et al

    . Thinner regions of intracranial aneurysm wall correlate with regions of higher wall shear stress: a 7T MRI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1310–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4734 pmid:26892986

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    1. Kleinloog R,
    2. Zwanenburg JJ,
    3. Schermers B, et al

    . Quantification of intracranial aneurysm volume pulsation with 7T MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:713–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5546 pmid:29472302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. van Walderveen MA,
    3. Garpebring A, et al

    . 7 Tesla MRA for the differentiation between intracranial aneurysms and infundibula. Magn Reson Imaging 2017;37:16–20 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2016.11.006 pmid:27840274

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Arenillas JF

    . Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke 2011;42:(1 Suppl):S20–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597278 pmid:21164126

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Harteveld AA,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. van der Worp HB, et al

    . Detecting intracranial vessel wall lesions with 7T-magnetic resonance imaging: patients with posterior circulation ischemia versus healthy controls. Stroke 2017;48:2601–04 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.017868 pmid:28701579

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    1. Harteveld AA,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. van der Worp HB, et al

    . High-resolution intracranial vessel wall MRI in an elderly asymptomatic population: comparison of 3T and 7T. Eur Radiol 2017;27:1585–95 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4483-3 pmid:27387876

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Harteveld AA,
    2. Denswil NP,
    3. Van Hecke W, et al

    . Ex vivo vessel wall thickness measurements of the human circle of Willis using 7T MRI. Atherosclerosis 2018;273:106–14 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.023 pmid:29715587

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Zhu C,
    2. Haraldsson H,
    3. Tian B, et al

    . High resolution imaging of the intracranial vessel wall at 3 and 7 T using 3D fast spin echo MRI. MAGMA 2016;29:559–70 doi:10.1007/s10334-016-0531-x pmid:26946509

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Zwartbol MH,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Ghaznawi R, et al

    . Intracranial vessel wall lesions on 7T MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). Stroke 2019;50:88–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022509 pmid:30582831

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Suri FK,
    3. Zhang Y, et al

    . Racial differences in prevalence and risk for intracranial atherosclerosis in a US community-based population. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1341–48 doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4041 pmid:29094154

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. van der Kolk AG,
    2. Zwanenburg JJ,
    3. Denswil NP, et al

    . Imaging the intracranial atherosclerotic vessel wall using 7T MRI: initial comparison with histopathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:694–701 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4178 pmid:25477359

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Kroner ES,
    2. van Schinkel LD,
    3. Versluis MJ, et al

    . Ultrahigh-field 7-T magnetic resonance carotid vessel wall imaging: initial experience in comparison with 3-T field strength. Invest Radiol 2012;47:697–704 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31826dc174 pmid:22996317

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Koning W,
    2. de Rotte AA,
    3. Bluemink JJ, et al

    . MRI of the carotid artery at 7 Tesla: quantitative comparison with 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:773–80 doi:10.1002/jmri.24601 pmid:24578311

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Majidi S,
    2. Sein J,
    3. Watanabe M, et al

    . Intracranial-derived atherosclerosis assessment: an in vitro comparison between virtual histology by intravascular ultrasonography, 7T MRI, and histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2259–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3631 pmid:23811977

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Madai VI,
    2. von Samson-Himmelstjerna FC,
    3. Bauer M, et al

    . Ultrahigh-field MRI in human ischemic stroke: a 7 Tesla study. PLoS One 2012;7:e37631 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037631 pmid:22701525

    CrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    1. Miyazawa H,
    2. Natori T,
    3. Kameda H, et al

    . Detecting lenticulostriate artery lesions in patients with acute ischemic stroke using high-resolution MRA at 7T. Int J Stroke 2019;14:290–97 doi:10.1177/1747493018806163 pmid:30299228

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    1. Kang CK,
    2. Park CA,
    3. Park CW, et al

    . Lenticulostriate arteries in chronic stroke patients visualised by 7T magnetic resonance angiography. Int J Stroke 2010;5:374–80 doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00464.x pmid:20854620

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    1. Cho ZH,
    2. Kang CK,
    3. Han JY, et al

    . Observation of the lenticulostriate arteries in the human brain in vivo using 7.0T MR angiography. Stroke 2008;39:1604–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508002 pmid:18340096

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
62. 62.↵
    1. Dengler NF,
    2. Madai VI,
    3. Wuerfel J, et al

    . Moyamoya vessel pathology imaged by ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 T. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:1544–51 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.041 pmid:27053027

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Oh BH,
    2. Moon HC,
    3. Baek HM, et al

    . Comparison of 7T and 3T MRI in patients with Moyamoya disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2017;37:134–38 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2016.11.019 pmid:27899331

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Lee A,
    2. McCartney S,
    3. Burbidge C, et al

    . Trigeminal neuralgia occurs and recurs in the absence of neurovascular compression. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1048–54 doi:10.3171/2014.1.JNS131410 pmid:24506241

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    1. Heverhagen JT,
    2. Bourekas E,
    3. Sammet S, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:568–73 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9b2c pmid:18648256

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Moon HC,
    2. You ST,
    3. Baek HM, et al

    . 7.0 Tesla MRI tractography in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;54:265–70 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.033 pmid:29305127

    CrossRefPubMed