Deep Transfer Learning and Radiomics Feature Prediction of Survival of Patients with High-Grade Gliomas

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pope WB,
   2. Sayre J,
   3. Perlina A, et al

   . MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2466–74 pmid:16286386

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Zhou M,
   2. Scott J,
   3. Chaudhury B, et al

   . Radiomics in brain tumor: image assessment, quantitative feature descriptors, and machine-learning approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:208–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5391 pmid:28982791

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Vallieres M,
   2. Freeman CR,
   3. Skamene SR, et al

   . A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:5471–96 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5471 pmid:26119045

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Aerts HJ,
   2. Velazquez ER,
   3. Leijenaar RT, et al

   . Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014;5:4006 doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 pmid:24892406

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Qu J,
   2. Qin L,
   3. Cheng S, et al

   . Residual low ADC and high FA at the resection margin correlate with poor chemoradiation response and overall survival in high-grade glioma patients. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:657–64 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.026 pmid:26860681

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Qin L,
   2. Li A,
   3. Qu J, et al

   . Normalization of ADC does not improve correlation with overall survival in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). J Neurooncol 2018;137:313–19 doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2719-y pmid:29383647

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Akkus Z,
   2. Galimzianova A,
   3. Hoogi A, et al

   . Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Digit Imaging 2017;30:449–59 doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 pmid:28577131

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Zhou X,
   2. Takayama R,
   3. Wang S, et al

   . Deep learning of the sectional appearances of 3D CT images for anatomical structure segmentation based on an FCN voting method. Med Phys 2017;44:5221–33 doi:10.1002/mp.12480 pmid:28730602

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Chmelik J,
   2. Jakubicek R,
   3. Walek P, et al

   . Deep convolutional neural network-based segmentation and classification of difficult to define metastatic spinal lesions in 3D CT data. Med Image Anal 2018;49:76–88 doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.07.008 pmid:30114549

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Acharya UR,
    2. Oh SL,
    3. Hagiwara Y, et al

    . A deep convolutional neural network model to classify heartbeats. Comput Biol Med 2017;89:389–96 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.022 pmid:28869899

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Burlina P,
    2. Pacheco KD,
    3. Joshi N, et al

    . Comparing humans and deep learning performance for grading AMD: a study in using universal deep features and transfer learning for automated AMD analysis. Comput Biol Med 2017;82:80–86 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.01.018 pmid:28167406

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Lao J,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Li ZC, et al

    . A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Sci Rep 2017;7:1035 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10649-8 pmid:28871110

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Nie D,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Adeli E, et al

    . 3D deep learning for multi-modal imaging-guided survival time prediction of brain tumor patients. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2016;9901:212–20 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_25 pmid:28149967

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Paul R,
    2. Hawkins SH,
    3. Balagurunathan Y, et al

    . Deep feature transfer learning in combination with traditional features predicts survival among patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Tomography 2016;2:388–95 doi:10.18383/j.tom.2016.00211 pmid:28066809

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Zhen X,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Zhong Z, et al

    . Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning for rectum toxicity prediction in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:8246–63 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa8d09 pmid:28914611

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Collewet G,
    2. Strzelecki M,
    3. Mariette F

    . Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:81–91 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2003.09.001 pmid:14972397

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Gibbs P,
    2. Turnbull LW

    . Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:92–98 doi:10.1002/mrm.10496 pmid:12815683

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Simonyan K,
    2. Zisseman A

    . Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014;arXiv:1409.1556
19. 19.↵
    1. Krizhevsky A,
    2. Sutskever I,
    3. Hinton GE

    . ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. J Commun. ACM 2017;60:84–90
20. 20.↵
    1. Simon N,
    2. Friedman J,
    3. Hastie T, et al

    . Regularization paths for Cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 2011;39:1–13 pmid:21572908, 27065756

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Feinstein AR

    . Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1985:xii
22. 22.↵
    1. Paul R,
    2. Hawkins SH,
    3. Hall LO, et al

    . Combining deep neural network and traditional image features to improve survival prediction accuracy for lung cancer patients from diagnostic CT. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Budapest, Hungary. October 9–12, 2016 doi:10.1109/SMC.2016.7844626
23. 23.↵
    1. Ahmed KB,
    2. Hall LO,
    3. Goldgof DB, et al

    . Fine-tuning convolutional deep features for MRI based brain tumor classification. In: Proceedings of Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Orlando, Florida. February 11–16, 2017
24. 24.↵
    1. Choi JY,
    2. Yoo TK,
    3. Seo JG, et al

    . Multi-categorical deep learning neural network to classify retinal images: a pilot study employing small database. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187336 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187336 pmid:29095872

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kaiming H,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Shaoqing R,
    4. Jian S

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Navada. June 26 to July 1, 2016
26. 26.↵
    1. Parmar C,
    2. Grossmann P,
    3. Bussink J, et al

    . Machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers. Sci Rep 2015;5:13087 doi:10.1038/srep13087 pmid:26278466

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Yin P,
    2. Mao N,
    3. Zhao C, et al

    . Comparison of radiomics machine-learning classifiers and feature selection for differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumour based on 3D computed tomography features. Eur Radiol 2019;29:1841–47 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5730-6 pmid:30280245

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. de Carvalho Filho AO,
    2. Silva AC,
    3. de Paiva AC, et al

    . Lung-nodule classification based on computed tomography using taxonomic diversity indexes and an SVM. J Signal Process Syst 2017;87:179–96 doi:10.1007/s11265-016-1134-5

    CrossRef
29. 29.↵
    1. Yu KH,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Berry GJ, et al

    . Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun 2016;7:12474 doi:10.1038/ncomms12474 pmid:27527408

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Cha S

    . CNS tumors: monitoring therapeutic response and outcome prediction. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17:63–68 doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e31802ee598 pmid:17198223

    CrossRefPubMed