Cross-Sectional Imaging of Third Molar–Related Abnormalities

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ghaeminia H,
   2. Perry J,
   3. Nienhuijs ME, et al

   . Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;CD003879 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub4 pmid:32368796

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Miclotte I,
   2. Agbaje JO,
   3. Spaey Y, et al

   . Incidence and treatment of complications in patients who had third molars or other teeth extracted. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56:388–93 doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.02.001 pmid:29673558

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Scheinfeld MH,
   2. Shifteh K,
   3. Avery LL, et al

   . Teeth: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 2012;32:1927–44 doi:10.1148/rg.327125717 pmid:23150849

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Husain MA

   . Dental anatomy and nomenclature for the radiologist. Radiology Clin North Am 2018;56:1–11 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.001 pmid:29157540

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Zohrabian VM,
   2. Poon CS,
   3. Abrahams JJ

   . Embryology and anatomy of the jaw and dentition. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2015;36:397–406 doi:10.1053/j.sult.2015.08.002 pmid:26589693

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Whyte A,
   2. Boeddinghaus R

   . Imaging of odontogenic sinusitis. Clin Radiol 2019;74:503–16 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.012 pmid:30926134

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Aksoy U,
   2. Aksoy S,
   3. Orhan K

   . A cone-beam computed tomography study of the anatomical relationships between mandibular teeth and the mandibular canal, with a review of the current literature. Microsc Res Tech 2018;81:308–14 doi:10.1002/jemt.22980

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Nasseh I,
   2. Al-Rawi W

   . Cone beam computed tomography. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:361–91 doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.002 pmid:29903556

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Gohel A,
   2. Oda M,
   3. Katkar AS, et al

   . Multidetector row computed tomography in maxillofacial imaging. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:453–65 doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.005 pmid:29903561

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Nardi C,
    2. Talamonti C,
    3. Pallotta S, et al

    . Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20170030 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20170030 pmid:28511564

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Schulze RK,
    2. Drage NA

    . Cone-beam computed tomography and its applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology. Clin Radiol 2020;May 23 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.crad.2020.04.006 pmid:32451060

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Miracle AC,
    2. Mukherji SK

    . Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1088–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1653 pmid:19439484

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Chindasombatjaroen J,
    2. Kakimoto N,
    3. Murakami S, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metals: comparison of cone-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners. Oral Radiology 2011;27:114–20 doi:10.1007/s11282-011-0071-z

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Scarfe WC,
    2. Toghyani S,
    3. Azevedo B

    . Imaging of benign odontogenic lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 2018;56:45–46 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.004 pmid:29157548

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Weissman JL,
    2. Carrau RL

    . “Puffed-cheek” CT improves evaluation of the oral cavity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:741–44 pmid:11290490

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Loureiro RM,
    2. Naves EA,
    3. Zanello RF, et al

    . Dental emergencies: a practical guide. Radiographics 2019;39:1782–95 doi:10.1148/rg.2019190019 pmid:31589571

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Barrett JF,
    2. Keat N

    . Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679–91 doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 pmid:15537976

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Katsura M,
    2. Sato J,
    3. Akahane M, et al

    . Current and novel techniques for metal artifact reduction at CT: practical guide for radiologists. Radiographics 2018;38:450–61 doi:10.1148/rg.2018170102 pmid:29528826

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Meyer KA,
    2. Bancroft LW,
    3. Dietrich TJ, et al

    . Imaging characteristics of benign, malignant, and infectious jaw lesions: a pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W412–21 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.7225 pmid:21862767

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Mardini S,
    2. Gohel A

    . Imaging of odontogenic infections. Radiol Clin North Am 2018;56:31–44 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.003 pmid:29157547

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Demirturk Kocasarac H,
    2. Geha H,
    3. Gaalaas LR, et al

    . MRI for dental applications. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:467–80 doi:10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.006 pmid:29903562

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Dessouky R,
    2. Xi Y,
    3. Zuniga J, et al

    . Role of MR neurography for the diagnosis of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries in patients with prior molar tooth extraction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:162–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5438 pmid:29146720

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Carter K,
    2. Worthington S

    . Predictors of third molar impaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016;95:267–76 doi:10.1177/0022034515615857 pmid:26561441

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Shoshani-Dror D,
    2. Shilo D,
    3. Ginini JG, et al

    . Controversy regarding the need for prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an overview. Quintessence Int 2018;49:653–62 doi:10.3290/j.qi.a40784 pmid:30109309

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Miclotte A,
    2. Grommen B,
    3. Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M, et al

    . The effect of first and second premolar extractions on third molars: a retrospective longitudinal study. J Dent 2017;61:55–66 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.03.007 pmid:28359700

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Steed MB

    . The indications for third-molar extractions. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:570–73 doi:10.14219/jada.2014.18 pmid:24878712

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Tassoker M

    . What are the risk factors for external root resorption of second molars associated with impacted third molars? A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:11–17 doi:10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.023 pmid:30265857

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Consolaro A,
    2. Bittencourt G

    . Why not to treat the tooth canal to solve external root resorptions? Here are the principles! Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:20–22 doi:10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.020-025.oin pmid:28125136

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Mortazavi H,
    2. Baharvand M

    . Jaw lesions associated with impacted tooth: a radiographic diagnostic guide. Imaging Sci Dent 2016;46:147–57 doi:10.5624/isd.2016.46.3.147 pmid:27672610

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Matzen LH,
    2. Wenzel A

    . Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review—based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140189 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140189 pmid:25135317

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Patil SR,
    2. Araki K,
    3. Yadav N, et al

    . Prevalence of hypercementosis in a Saudi Arabian population: a cone beam computed tomography study. J Oral Res 2018;7:94–97 doi:10.17126/joralres.2018.022 pmid:31597794

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Kim SM

    . Definition and management of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;41:13 doi:10.1186/s40902-019-0196-2 pmid:30989083

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Little RE,
    2. Long CM,
    3. Loehrl TA, et al

    . Odontogenic sinusitis: a review of the current literature. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2018;3:110–14 doi:10.1002/lio2.147 pmid:29721543

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Mosier KM

    . Lesions of the jaw. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2015;36:444–50 doi:10.1053/j.sult.2015.08.003 pmid:26589698

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Bilodeau EA,
    2. Collins BM

    . Odontogenic cysts and neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin 2017;10:177–222 doi:10.1016/j.path.2016.10.006 pmid:28153133

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Borghesi A,
    2. Nardi C,
    3. Giannitto C, et al

    . Odontogenic keratocyst: imaging features of a benign lesion with an aggressive behaviour. Insights Imaging 2018;9:883–97 doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0644-z pmid:30066143

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Sumi M,
    2. Ichikawa Y,
    3. Katayama I, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of ameloblastomas and keratocystic odontogenic tumors: differentiation by apparent diffusion coefficients of cystic lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1897–901 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1266 pmid:18719033

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Oren N,
    2. Vaysberg A,
    3. Ginat DT

    . Updated WHO nomenclature of head and neck lesions and associated imaging findings. Insights Imaging 2019;10:72 doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0760-4 pmid:31312967

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Contar CM,
    2. de Oliveira P,
    3. Kanegusuku K, et al

    . Complications in third molar removal: a retrospective study of 588 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e74–78 doi:10.4317/medoral.15.e74 pmid:19767694

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Deliverska EG,
    2. Petkova M

    . Complications after extraction of impacted third molars—literature review. J IMAB 2016;22:1202–11 doi:10.5272/jimab.2016223.1202

    CrossRef
41. 41.↵
    1. Bouloux GF,
    2. Steed MB,
    3. Perciaccante VJ

    . Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:117–28 doi:10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013 pmid:18088870

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Capps EF,
    2. Kinsella JJ,
    3. Gupta M, et al

    . Emergency imaging assessment of acute, nontraumatic conditions of the head and neck. Radiographics 2010;30:1335–52 doi:10.1148/rg.305105040 pmid:20833854

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Susarla SM,
    2. Smart RJ,
    3. Dodson TB

    . Complications associated with dentoalveolar surgery. In: Andersson L, Kahnberg KE, Pogrel MA, eds. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Blackwell; 2010:155–63
44. 44.↵
    1. Chrcanovic BR,
    2. Custódio AL

    . Considerations of mandibular angle fractures during and after surgery for removal of third molars: a review of the literature. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;14:71–80 doi:10.1007/s10006-009-0201-5 pmid:20091416

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Kretzschmar DP,
    2. Kretzschmar JL

    . Rhinosinusitis: review from a dental perspective. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:128–35 doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00306-8 pmid:12931083

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Cox B,
    2. Zuniga JR,
    3. Panchal N, et al

    . Magnetic resonance neurography in the management of peripheral trigeminal neuropathy: experience in a tertiary care centre. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3392–400 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4182-5 pmid:26795500

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Juodzbalys G,
    2. Daugela P

    . Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4:e1 doi:10.5037/jomr.2013.4201 pmid:24422029

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Leung YY,
    2. Cheung LK

    . Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1–10 doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.005 pmid:21035310

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Iwai T,
    2. Chikumaru H,
    3. Shibasaki M, et al

    . Safe method of extraction to prevent a deeply-impacted maxillary third molar being displaced into the maxillary sinus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:e75-6–e76 doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.04.076 pmid:22560787

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.
    1. Hara Y,
    2. Shiratsuchi H,
    3. Tamagawa T, et al

    . A large-scale study of treatment methods for foreign bodies in the maxillary sinus. J Oral Sci 2018;60:321–28 doi:10.2334/josnusd.18-0109 pmid:30249933

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Di Nardo D,
    2. Mazzucchi G,
    3. Lollobrigida M, et al

    . Immediate or delayed retrieval of the displaced third molar: a review. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e55–61 doi:10.4317/jced.55379 pmid:30697395

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Romeo U,
    2. Galanakis A,
    3. Lerario F, et al

    . Subcutaneous emphysema during third molar surgery: a case report. Braz Dent J 2011;22:83–86 doi:10.1590/s0103-64402011000100015 pmid:21519655

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Tay YBE,
    2. Loh WS

    . Extensive subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and pneumorrhachis following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:1609–12 doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.023 pmid:29752202

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Craddock HL

    . An investigation of overeruption of posterior teeth with partial occlusal contact. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:246–50 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01686.x pmid:17371561

    CrossRefPubMed