Maximum AmbiGuity Distance for Phase Imaging in Detection of Traumatic Cerebral Microbleeds: An Improvement over Current Imaging Practice

References

1. 1.↵
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance Report of Traumatic Brain Injury-related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths—United States, 2014. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/TBI-Surveillance-Report-FINAL_508.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2019
2. 2.↵
   1. Thurman DJ,
   2. Alverson C,
   3. Dunn KA, et al

   . Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999;14:602–15 doi:10.1097/00001199-199912000-00009 pmid:10671706

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Xi G,
   2. Keep RF,
   3. Hoff JT

   . Mechanisms of brain injury after intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:53–63 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70283-0 pmid:16361023

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Hughes DG,
   2. Jackson A,
   3. Mason DL, et al

   . Abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging seen acutely following mild traumatic brain injury: correlation with neuropsychological tests and delayed recovery. Neuroradiology 2004;46:550–58 doi:10.1007/s00234-004-1227-x pmid:15185054

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Scheid R,
   2. Preul C,
   3. Gruber O, et al

   . Diffuse axonal injury associated with chronic traumatic brain injury: evidence from T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1049–56 pmid:12812926

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fazekas F,
   2. Kleinert R,
   3. Roob G, et al

   . Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:637–42 pmid:10319975

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Goos JD,
   2. van der Flier WM,
   3. Knol DL, et al

   . Clinical relevance of improved microbleed detection by susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2011;42:1894–1900 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599837 pmid:21566235

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Greenberg SM,
   2. Vernooij MW,
   3. Cordonnier C, et al

   ; Microbleed Study Group. Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:165–74 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70013-4 pmid:19161908

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Uetani H,
   2. Hirai T,
   3. Hashimoto M, et al

   . Prevalence and topography of small hypointense foci suggesting microbleeds on 3T susceptibility-weighted imaging in various types of dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:984–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3332 pmid:23124636

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Haller S,
    2. Montandon ML,
    3. Lazeyras F, et al

    . Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of cerebral microbleeds using pre-mortem and post-mortem MRI. PLoS One 2016;11:e0167743 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167743 pmid:27936213

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Dagher J,
    2. Nael K

    . MAGPI: a framework for maximum likelihood MR phase imaging using multiple receive coils. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:1218–31 doi:10.1002/mrm.25756 pmid:25946426

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wu B,
    2. Li W,
    3. Avram AV, et al

    . Fast and tissue-optimized mapping of magnetic susceptibility and T2* with multi-echo and multi-shot spirals. Neuroimage 2012;59:297–305 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.019 pmid:21784162

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Dagher J,
    2. Nael K

    . MR phase imaging with bipolar acquisition. NMR Biomed 2017;30: doi:10.1002/nbm.3523 pmid:27149433

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Cheng YC, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–18 doi:10.1002/mrm.20198 pmid:15334582

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. McPhee KC,
    2. Denk C,
    3. Al-Rekabi Z, et al

    . Bilateral filtering of magnetic resonance phase images. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:1023–29 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.03.009 pmid:21664782

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Fine MS,
    2. Lum PS,
    3. Brokaw EB, et al

    . Dynamic motor tracking is sensitive to subacute mTBI. Exp Brain Res 2016;234:3173–84 doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4714-5 pmid:27392948

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Cordonnier C,
    2. Potter GM,
    3. Jackson CA, et al

    . improving interrater agreement about brain microbleeds: development of the Brain Observer MicroBleed Scale (BOMBS). Stroke 2009;40:94–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526996 pmid:19008468

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Chen JK,
    2. Johnston KM,
    3. Collie A, et al

    . A validation of the post concussion symptom scale in the assessment of complex concussion using cognitive testing and functional MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1231–38 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.110395 pmid:17371902

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Keenan KE,
    2. Berman BP,
    3. Carnicka S, et al

    . Validating the acquisition and phase estimation process for magnetic susceptibility measurement. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on MRI Phase Contrast & Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping, Soeul, Korea. September 25–28, 2019
20. 20.↵
    1. Schrag M,
    2. Greer DM

    . Clinical associations of cerebral microbleeds on magnetic resonance neuroimaging. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:2489–97 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.006 pmid:25294059

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Scheid R,
    2. Walther K,
    3. Guthke T, et al

    . Cognitive sequelae of diffuse axonal injury. Arch Neurol 2006;63:418–24 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.3.418 pmid:16533969

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Ayaz M,
    2. Boikov AS,
    3. Haacke EM, et al

    . Imaging cerebral microbleeds using susceptibility weighted imaging: one step toward detecting vascular dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:142–48 doi:10.1002/jmri.22001 pmid:20027582

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Sommer K,
    3. Deistung A, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage 2012;62:2083–2100 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.067 pmid:22659482

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Tong KA,
    2. Ashwal S,
    3. Holshouser BA, et al

    . Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results. Radiology 2003;227:332–39 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272020176 pmid:12732694

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Nandigam RN,
    2. Viswanathan A,
    3. Delgado P, et al

    . MR imaging detection of cerebral microbleeds: effect of susceptibility-weighted imaging, section thickness, and field strength. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:338–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1355 pmid:19001544

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Wei XE,
    3. Li MH, et al

    . Microbleeds on susceptibility-weighted MRI in depressive and non-depressive patients after mild traumatic brain injury. Neurol Sci 2014;35:1533–39 doi:10.1007/s10072-014-1788-3 pmid:24740482

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Huang YL,
    2. Kuo YS,
    3. Tseng YC, et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted MRI in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2015;84:580–85 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001237 pmid:25576634

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Wang WT,
    3. Sati P, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of susceptibility-weighted imaging processing methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:1463–73 doi:10.1002/jmri.24501 pmid:24923594

    CrossRefPubMed