Changing the Rules of the Game: The Problem of Surrogate Angiographic Outcomes in the Evaluation of Aneurysm Treatments

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Fleming TR,
   2. DeMets DL

   . Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med 1996;125:605–13 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011 pmid:8815760

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. McDougall CG,
   2. Johnston SC,
   3. Gholkar A, et al

   . Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3857 pmid:24481333

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Darsaut TE,
   3. Guilbert F, et al

   . Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:147–53 doi:10.1177/159101991101700202 pmid:21696651

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Roy D,
   3. White PM, et al

   . A Randomized Trial Comparing Platinum and Hydrogel-coated Coils in Patients Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment (the PRET trial). Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14:73–83 doi:10.1177/159101990801400110 pmid:20557789

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. White PM,
   2. Lewis SC,
   3. Gholkar A, et al

   . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X pmid:21571149

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study. The CAPS investigators. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:91–95 doi:10.1016/0002-9149(86)90958-6

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Ruskin JN

   . The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). N Engl J Med 1989;321:386–88 doi:10.1056/NEJM198908103210608 pmid:2501683

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Haynes BR,
   2. Sackett DL,
   3. Guyatt GH, et al

   . Clinical Epidemiology: How to Do Clinical Practice Research. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
9. 9.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I

   , International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–1403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Becske T,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Gauvrit JY, et al

    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869 pmid:24457823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Barreau X, et al

    . Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2020 Jun 12 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016151 pmid:32532858

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Cekirge HS,
    2. Saatci I

    . A new aneurysm occlusion classification after the impact of flow modification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:19–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4489 pmid:26316566

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Kotowski M,
    2. Farzin B,
    3. Fahed R, et al

    . Residual cerebral aneurysms after microsurgical clipping: a new scale, an agreement study, and a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2019;121:e302–21 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.100 pmid:30261387

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. O'Kelly CJ,
    2. Krings T,
    3. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed