Impact of Aortic Arch Anatomy on Technical Performance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Benjamin EJ,
   2. Blaha MJ,
   3. Chiuve SE, et al

   ; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2017 Update—A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;135:e146–603 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485 pmid:28122885

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Saver JL,
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Bonafe A, et al

   ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Menon BK, et al

   ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Campbell BC,
   2. Mitchell PJ,
   3. Kleinig T

   J, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Berkhemer OA,
   2. Fransen PS,
   3. Beumer D, et al

   ; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Hassan AE,
   2. Chaudhry SA,
   3. Miley JT, et al

   . Microcatheter to recanalization (procedure time) predicts outcomes in endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: when do we stop? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:354–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3202 pmid:22821922

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Spiotta AM,
   2. Vargas J,
   3. Turner R, et al

   . The golden hour of stroke intervention: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:511–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010726 pmid:24014466

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Ribo M,
   2. Flores A,
   3. Rubiera M, et al

   . Difficult catheter access to the occluded vessel during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 1):170–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010438 pmid:23117130

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kaymaz Z,
   2. Nikoubashman O,
   3. Brockmann M, et al

   . Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:583–88 doi:10.1177/1591019917729364

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Banks JL,
    2. Marotta CA

    . Outcomes validity and reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 2007;38:1091–96 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6 pmid:17272767

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Boufi M,
    2. Guivier-Curien C,
    3. Loundou AD, et al

    . Morphological analysis of healthy aortic arch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:663–70 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.023 pmid:28351602

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Lin SC,
    2. Trocciola SM,
    3. Rhee J, et al

    . Analysis of anatomic factors and age in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:798–804 pmid:16200468

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 2018. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed January 31, 2019
14. 14.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Mitchell PJ,
    3. Kleinig TJ, et al

    ; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Dumont TM,
    2. Mokin M,
    3. Wach MM, et al

    . Understanding risk factors for perioperative ischemic events with carotid stenting: is patient age over 80 years or is unfavorable arch anatomy to blame? J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:219–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010721 pmid:23685755

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Burzotta F,
    2. Nerla R,
    3. Pirozzolo G, et al

    . Clinical and procedural impact of aortic arch anatomic variants in carotid stenting procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:480–89 doi:10.1002/ccd.25947 pmid:25846903

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Müller MD,
    2. Ahlhelm FJ,
    3. Von Hessling A, et al

    . Vascular anatomy predicts the risk of cerebral ischemia in patients randomized to carotid stenting versus endarterectomy. Stroke 2017;48:1285–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014612 pmid:28400487

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Snelling BM,
    2. Sur S,
    3. Shah SS, et al

    . Unfavorable vascular anatomy is associated with increased revascularization time and worse outcome in anterior circulation thrombectomy. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e976–83 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.207 pmid:30196176

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Madhwal S,
    2. Rajagopal V,
    3. Bhatt DL, et al

    . Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:200–04 pmid:18460700

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Pancera P,
    2. Ribul M,
    3. Presciuttini B, et al

    . Prevalence of carotid artery kinking in 590 consecutive subjects evaluated by Echocolordoppler: is there a correlation with arterial hypertension? J Intern Med 2000;248:7–12 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00611.x

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Del Corso L,
    2. Moruzzo D,
    3. Conte B, et al

    . Tortuosity, kinking, and coiling of the carotid artery: expression of atherosclerosis or aging? Angiology 1998;49:361–71 doi:10.1177/000331979804900505 pmid:9591528

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Han HC

    . Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res 2012;49:185–87 doi:10.1159/000335123 pmid:22433458

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Messas E,
    2. Pernot M,
    3. Couade M

    . Arterial wall elasticity: state of the art and future prospects. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94:561–69 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.025 pmid:23619291

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Liebeskind DS, et al

    ; HERMES Trialists Collaboration. Association of time from stroke onset to groin puncture with quality of reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 7 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:405–11 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4510 pmid:30667465

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Schmitz ML,
    2. Yeatts SD,
    3. Tomsick TA, et al

    . Recanalization and angiographic reperfusion are both associated with a favorable clinical outcome in the IMS III trial. Interv Neurol 2016;5:118–12 doi:10.1159/000446749 pmid:27781039

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Mulder M,
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Goldhoorn RJ, et al

    . Time to endovascular treatment and outcome in acute ischemic stroke: MR CLEAN Registry results. Circulation 2018;138:232–40 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032600 pmid:29581124

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Chen SH,
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S, et al

    . Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointervent Surg 2019;11:874–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014485 pmid:30670623

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Maud A,
    2. Khatri R,
    3. Chaudhry MRA, et al

    . Transradial access results in faster skin puncture to reperfusion time than transfemoral access in posterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2019;10:53–57 pmid:31308872

    PubMed