Characterization of Carotid Plaque Components by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Takaya N,
   2. Yuan C,
   3. Chu B, et al

   . Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006;37:818–23 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91 pmid:16469957

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Liu XS,
   2. Zhao HL,
   3. Cao Y, et al

   . Comparison of carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by high-resolution black-blood MR imaging between patients with first-time and recurrent acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1257–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2965 pmid:22345496

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Hellings WE,
   2. Peeters W,
   3. Moll FL, et al

   . Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation 2010;121:1941–50 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887497 pmid:20404256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Altaf N,
   2. Daniels L,
   3. Morgan PS, et al

   . Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:337–42 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.064 pmid:18164171

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Saam T,
   2. Hetterich H,
   3. Hoffmann V, et al

   . Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1081–91 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015 pmid:23850912

   FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Altaf N,
   2. Beech A,
   3. Goode SD, et al

   . Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detected by magnetic resonance imaging predicts embolization during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:31–36 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.072 pmid:17543492

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhou T,
   2. Jia S,
   3. Wang X, et al

   . Diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage in the carotid arteries: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2019;29:5129–38 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06053-7 pmid:30847588

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Toussaint JF,
   2. LaMuraglia GM,
   3. Southern JF, et al

   . Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation 1996;94:932–38 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.94.5.932 pmid:8790028

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Yuan C,
   2. Mitsumori LM,
   3. Ferguson MS, et al

   . In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001;104:2051–56 doi:10.1161/hc4201.097839 pmid:11673345

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Nagayama M

    . MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery. Neuroradiol 2010;52:253–74 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0663-z pmid:20155353

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Bitar R,
    2. Moody AR,
    3. Symons S, et al

    . Carotid atherosclerotic calcification does not result in high signal intensity in MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1403–07 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2126 pmid:20466799

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Wasserman BA,
    2. Smith WI,
    3. Trout HH, 3rd., et al

    . Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MRI imaging: initial results. Radiology 2002;223:566–73 doi:10.1148/radiol.2232010659 pmid:11997569

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Bitar R,
    2. Moody AR,
    3. Leung G, et al

    . In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology 2008;249:259–67 doi:10.1148/radiol.2491071517 pmid:18796681

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Moody AR,
    2. Murphy RE,
    3. Morgan PS, et al

    . Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3047–52 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000074222.61572.44 pmid:12796133

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Chu B,
    2. Kampschulte A,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al

    . Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke 2004;35:1079–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86 pmid:15060318

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Surapaneni K,
    3. Lou M, et al

    . Cerebral microbleeds: burden assessment by using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2012;262:269–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110251 pmid:22056688

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Langkammer C,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Khalil M, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2013;267:551–59 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120707 pmid:23315661

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Chang S,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Liu T, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping of intracerebral hemorrhages at various stages. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:420–25 doi:10.1002/jmri.25143 pmid:26718014

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Zhu W,
    3. Kovanlikaya I, et al

    . Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2014;270:496–505 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122640 pmid:24126366

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Eisenmenger LB,
    2. Aldred BW,
    3. Kim SE, et al

    . Prediction of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage using adventitial calcification and plaque thickness on CTA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1496–503 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4765 pmid:27102316

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Sommer K,
    3. Deistung A, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage 2012;62:2083–100 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.067 pmid:22659482

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kolodgie FD,
    2. Gold HK,
    3. Burke AP, et al

    . Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2316–25 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035655 pmid:14668457

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Deistung A,
    3. Lehr BW, et al

    . Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010;37:5165–78 doi:10.1118/1.3481505 pmid:21089750

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Gupta RK,
    2. Rao SB,
    3. Jain R, et al

    . Differentiation of calcification from chronic hemorrhage with corrected gradient echo phase imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:698–704 doi:10.1097/00004728-200109000-00006 pmid:11584228

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Yamada N,
    2. Imakita S,
    3. Sakuma T, et al

    . Intracranial calcification on gradient-echo phase image: depiction of diamagnetic susceptibility. Radiology 1996;198:171–78 doi:10.1148/radiology.198.1.8539373 pmid:8539373

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Zhu WZ,
    2. Qi JP,
    3. Zhan CJ, et al

    . Magnetic resonance susceptibility weighted imaging in detecting intracranial calcification and hemorrhage. Chin Med J 2008;121:2021–25 doi:10.1097/00029330-200810020-00014 pmid:19080268

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. de Rochefort L,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Kressler B, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:194–206 pmid:19953507

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Chang S,
    3. Liu T, et al

    . Reducing the object orientation dependence of susceptibility effects in gradient echo MRI through quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:1563–69 doi:10.1002/mrm.24135 pmid:22851199

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Thelwall PE,
    2. Shepherd TM,
    3. Stanisz GJ, et al

    . Effects of temperature and aldehyde fixation on tissue water diffusion properties, studied in an erythrocyte ghost tissue model. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:282–89 doi:10.1002/mrm.20962 pmid:16841346

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Pfefferbaum A,
    2. Sullivan EV,
    3. Adalsteinsson E, et al

    . Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. Neuroimage 2004;21:1585–95 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.024 pmid:15050582

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Tan H,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Mikati AG, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping in cerebral cavernous malformations: clinical correlations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1209–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4724 pmid:26965464

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Klahr AC,
    3. Kate M, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for following intracranial hemorrhage. Radiology 2018;288:830–39 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018171918 pmid:29916778

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Gomori JM,
    2. Grossman RI

    . Mechanisms responsible for the MR appearance and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage. Radiographics 1988;8:427–40 doi:10.1148/radiographics.8.3.3380989 pmid:3380989

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Mikati AG,
    2. Tan H,
    3. Shenkar R, et al

    . Dynamic permeability and quantitative susceptibility: related imaging biomarkers in cerebral cavernous malformations. Stroke 2014;45:598–601 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003548 pmid:24302484

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Barger AC,
    2. Beeuwkes R, 3rd.,
    3. Lainey LL, et al

    . Hypothesis: vasa vasorum and neovascularization of human coronary arteries: a possible role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 1984;310:175–77 doi:10.1056/NEJM198401193100307 pmid:6197652

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Daemen MJ,
    2. Ferguson MS,
    3. Gijsen FJ, et al

    . Carotid plaque fissure: an underestimated source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Atherosclerosis 2016;254:102–08 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.069 pmid:27718372

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. van den Bouwhuijsen QJ,
    2. Selwaness M,
    3. Tang H, et al

    . Change in carotid intraplaque hemorrhage in community-dwelling subjects: a follow-up study using serial MR imaging. Radiology 2017;282:526–33 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151806 pmid:27541684

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Ikebe Y,
    2. Ishimaru H,
    3. Imai H, et al

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping for carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a pilot study. Magn Reson Med Sci 2019 May 31. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0077 pmid:31155568

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Evia AM,
    2. Kotrotsou A,
    3. Tamhane AA, et al

    . Ex-vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain hemispheres. PLoS One 2017;12:e0188395 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188395 pmid:29261693

    CrossRefPubMed