Reduction of Radiation Dose and Scanning Time While Preserving Diagnostic Yield: A Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hau MA,
   2. Kim JI,
   3. Kattapuram S, et al

   . Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:349–53 doi:10.1007/s00256-002-0474-3 pmid:2073119

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Yao L,
   2. Nelson SD,
   3. Seeger LL, et al

   . Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology 1999;212:682–86 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se19682 pmid:10478232

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Wu JS,
   2. Goldsmith JD,
   3. Horwich PJ, et al

   . Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology 2008;248:962–70 doi:10.1148/radiol.2483071742 pmid:18710986

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Anderson JM,
   2. Murchison J,
   3. Patel D

   . CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol 2003;58:791–97 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00221-6 pmid:14521889

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Cohen MG,
   2. McMahon CJ,
   3. Kung JW, et al

   . Comparison of battery-powered and manual bone biopsy systems for core needle biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:W83–86 doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15067 pmid:26959290

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Li Y,
   2. Du Y,
   3. Luo TY, et al

   . Factors influencing diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for bone lesions. Clin Radiol 2014;69:e43–47 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.003 pmid:24268511

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Vieillard MH,
   2. Boutry N,
   3. Chastanet P, et al

   . Contribution of percutaneous biopsy to the definite diagnosis in patients with suspected bone tumor. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72:53–60 doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.03.008 pmid:15681249

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Miller LJ,
   2. Philbeck TE,
   3. Montez DF, et al

   . Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices. Hematol Rep 2011;3:e8 doi:10.4081/hr.2011.e8 pmid:22184530

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Berenson JR,
   2. Yellin O,
   3. Blumenstein B, et al

   . Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens. Diagn Pathol 2011;6:23 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-6-23 pmid:21429220

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Reed LJ,
    2. Raghupathy R,
    3. Strakhan M, et al

    . The OnControl bone marrow biopsy technique is superior to the standard manual technique for hematologists-in-training: a prospective, randomized comparison. Hematol Rep 2011;3:e21 doi:10.4081/hr.2011.e21 pmid:22593813

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Maciel MJ,
    2. Tyng CJ,
    3. Barbosa P, et al

    . Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of bone lesions: rate of diagnostic success and complications. Radiology Bras 2014;47:269–74 doi:10.1590/0100-3984.2013.0004 pmid:25741100

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wiesner EL,
    2. Hillen TJ,
    3. Long J, et al

    . Percutaneous CT-guided biopsies of the cervical spine: technique, histopathologic and microbiologic yield, and safety at a single academic institution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:981–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5603 pmid:29650783

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Wallace AN,
    2. McWilliams SR,
    3. Wallace A, et al

    . Drill-assisted biopsy of the axial and appendicular skeleton: safety, technical success, and diagnostic efficacy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:1618–22 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.036 pmid:27670996

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chang IY,
    2. Ilaslan H,
    3. Sundaram M, et al

    . CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of sclerotic bone lesions: diagnostic outcomes. Skeletal Radiol 2018;47:661–69 doi:10.1007/s00256-017-2828-x pmid:29218391

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wallace AN,
    2. Pacheco RA,
    3. Vyhmeister R, et al

    . Fluoroscopy-guided intervertebral disc biopsy with a coaxial drill system. Skeletal Radiol 2016;45:273–78 doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2273-7 pmid:26572628

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Shpilberg KA,
    2. Delman BN,
    3. Tanenbaum LN, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction in CT-guided spine biopsies does not reduce diagnostic yield. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2243–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4053] pmid:25034779

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Didolkar MM,
    2. Anderson ME,
    3. Hochman MG, et al

    . Image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: are nondiagnostic results clinically useful? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3601–09 doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3170-9 pmid:23861048

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Holmes MG,
    2. Foss E,
    3. Joseph G, et al

    . CT–guided bone biopsies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: factors predictive of maximum tumor yield. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017;28:1073–81.e1 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2017.04.019 pmid:28549709

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. McKay RR,
    2. Zukotynski KA,
    3. Werner L, et al

    . Imaging, procedural and clinical variables associated with tumor yield on bone biopsy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2014;17:325–31 doi:10.1038/pcan.2014.28 pmid:25091040

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Omura MC,
    2. Motamedi K,
    3. UyBico S, et al

    . Revisiting CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: contributors to biopsy success. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:457–61 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6145 pmid:21785094

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Duda SH,
    2. Johst U,
    3. Krahmer K, et al

    . Technique and results of CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy [in German]. Orthopade 2001;30:545–50 doi:10.1007/s001320170064 pmid:11552396

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Mulder L,
    2. Koolstra JH,
    3. den Toonder JMJ, et al

    . Intratrabecular distribution of tissue stiffness and mineralization in developing trabecular bone. Bone 2007;41:256–65 doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.04.188 pmid:17567548

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Chang CY,
    2. Simeone FJ,
    3. Huang AJ

    . Battery-powered bone drill: caution needed in densely blastic lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2015;44:1845–48 doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2241-2 pmid:26315889

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Puri A,
    2. Shingade VU,
    3. Agarwal MG, et al

    . CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in deep seated musculoskeletal lesions: a prospective study of 128 cases. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:138–43 doi:10.1007/s00256-005-0038-4 pmid:16391943

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Tsukushi S,
    2. Katagiri H,
    3. Nakashima H, et al

    . Application and utility of computed tomography-guided needle biopsy with musculoskeletal lesions. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:122–25 doi:10.1007/s00776-003-0754-3 pmid:15045539

    CrossRefPubMed