Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleAdult Brain

SWAN-Venule: An Optimized MRI Technique to Detect the Central Vein Sign in MS Plaques

M.I. Gaitán, P. Yañez, M.E. Paday Formenti, I. Calandri, E. Figueiredo, P. Sati and J. Correale
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2020, 41 (3) 456-460; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6437
M.I. Gaitán
aFrom the Department of Neurology (M.I.G., J.C.), Neuroimmunolgy Section
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.I. Gaitán
P. Yañez
bDepartments of Radiology (P.Y., M.E.P.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Yañez
M.E. Paday Formenti
bDepartments of Radiology (P.Y., M.E.P.F.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.E. Paday Formenti
I. Calandri
cNeurology (I.C.), FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I. Calandri
E. Figueiredo
dGE healthcare (E.F.), Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Figueiredo
P. Sati
eTranslational Neuroradiology Section (P.S.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Sati
J. Correale
aFrom the Department of Neurology (M.I.G., J.C.), Neuroimmunolgy Section
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Correale
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis lesions develop around small veins that are radiologically described as the so-called central vein sign. With 7T MR imaging and magnetic susceptibility–based sequences, the central vein sign has been observed in 80%–100% of MS lesions in patients’ brains. However, a lower proportion ∼50% has been reported at 3T using susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN). Our aim was to assess a modified version of SWAN optimized at 3T for sensitive detection of the central vein sign.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects with MS were scanned on a 3T clinical MR imaging system. 3D T2-weighted FLAIR and optimized 3D SWAN called SWAN-venule, were acquired after injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Patients showing >3 focal white matter lesions were included. The central vein sign was recorded by 2 trained raters on SWAN-venule images in the supratentorial brain.

RESULTS: Twenty patients showing >3 white matter lesions were included. A total of 380 white matter lesions (135 periventricular, 144 deep white matter, and 101 juxtacortical) seen on both FLAIR and SWAN-venule images were analyzed. Overall, the central vein sign was detected in 86% of the white matter lesions (periventricular, 89%; deep white matter, 95%; and juxtacortical, 78%).

CONCLUSIONS: The SWAN-venule technique is an optimized MR imaging sequence for highly sensitive detection of the central vein sign in MS brain lesions. This work will facilitate the validation and integration of the central vein sign to increase the diagnostic certainty of MS and further prevent misdiagnosis in clinical practice.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CVS
central vein sign
RRMS
relapsing-remitting MS
SWAN
susceptibility-weighted angiography
WML
white matter lesion

Pathologic studies from last century1 have shown that MS lesions develop around small veins and venules. With the recent advancement of magnetic susceptibility–based MR imaging, these veins located centrally within MS lesions can now be depicted in vivo.2⇓-4 Due to the paramagnetic nature of deoxyhemoglobin, venous structures can be visualized as hypointense lines or dots on susceptibility-based MR imaging (eg, T2*-weighted, susceptibility-weighted imaging). Recently, the radiologic definition of a vein located centrally within an MS lesion, the so-called central vein sign (CVS), has been proposed by the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative.5

By means of the higher image resolution and stronger susceptibility contrast provided by 7T MR imaging, the percentage of lesions with the CVS has been reported to vary between 80% and 100% of white matter lesions (WMLs) in the brains of patients with MS,3 with a decreased gradient from the periventricular areas to the neocortex,6 with similar percentages across the different MS phenotypes.7 Most interesting, a lower percentage of brain lesions with the CVS (0%-45%) was observed in other neurologic disorders such as aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G4–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder,8 systemic autoimmune diseases,9 cerebral small vessel disease,10 Susac syndrome,11 and white matter migraine lesions.1 In a recent large multicenter study from the magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis (MAGNIMS) evaluating the diagnostic value of the CVS, a sensitivity of 68.1% and a specificity of 82.9% were reported for distinguishing MS using a 35% CVS proportion threshold.12 Therefore, CVS is a promising imaging biomarker that could help discriminate MS from its radiologic mimics and ultimately increase the accuracy of MS diagnosis 5 and reduce misdiagnosis.13

A variety of susceptibility-based MR imaging sequences may be used to detect the CVS at clinical field strength (1.5T or 3T), such as susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN). However, SWAN has been shown to be less sensitive at 3T than optimized sequences, such as the T2*-weighted 3D echo-planar imaging sequence.14⇓-16 The objective of the study was to assess the performance of a newly optimized SWAN sequence in detecting the CVS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Thirty patients from the FLENI MS Clinic were scanned consecutively. Brain MR imaging showing >3 typical hyperintense focal lesions was analyzed.

MR Image Acquisition

Subjects were scanned on a 3T MR imaging system (Discovery MR750; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) using a 32-channel head coil array. A comprehensive MS protocol was performed, including the following—3D T2-weighted FLAIR: FOV = 26  × 26 cm; number of slices = 146; voxel resolution = 0.47 × 0.47  × 1.2 mm; TE = 116 ms; TR = 6200 ms; TI = 1710 ms; echo-train length = 220; acquisition time = 4.18 minutes; and optimized 3D SWAN-venule: FOV = 22  × 16 cm; number of slices = 126; voxel resolution = 0.4  × 0.4  × 0.8 mm, with the possibility to reformat to 0.4  × 0.4  × 0.4 mm; TR = 47 ms; TE = 28 ms; flip angle = 8°; echo-train length = 9; acquisition time = 7.38 minutes. SWAN-venule was optimized by modifying the clinically available SWAN sequence in the following manner: reduction of the section thickness from 3  to 0.8 mm; reduction of the flip angle from 20° to 10° and finally to 8°, which minimized T1-weighted contrast and increased T2-weighted contrast; and reduction of the TR to the minimal value allowed by the gradient performance, reducing the acquisition time. Both FLAIR and SWAN-venule sequences were immediately acquired after the intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium-based contrast agent (gadoterate meglumine, Dotarem; Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France).

Image Analysis

A neuroradiologist (P.Y.) and a neurologist trained in MR imaging and MS (M.I.G.) were the 2 independent readers. Image interpretation was performed on a standard PACS workstation. The quality of SWAN-venule images for visualizing WMLs was compared with FLAIR images in 3 cases (Fig 1). SWAN-venule images were coregistered to FLAIR images using the synchronization tool of the workstation. All the supratentorial nonconfluent lesions, >3 mm and <15 mm in-plane, visible on both SWAN-venule and FLAIR images, were recorded. These lesions were then classified as periventricular (T2-hyperintense cerebral white matter lesions abutting the lateral ventricles without white matter in between, including lesions in the corpus callosum but excluding lesions in deep gray matter structures),17,18 deep white matter, or juxtacortical (T2-hyperintense cerebral white matter lesions abutting the cortex, not separated from it by white matter).17,18 Afterward, each lesion was evaluated for the CVS on SWAN-venule images according to the radiologic definition of the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative consensus statement:5 a thin hypointense line or small hypointense dot, visualized in at least 2 perpendicular MR imaging planes, centered on a lesion. Lesions with a vein located at the periphery or lesions with multiple veins were counted as negative for the CVS.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Comparison between FLAIR and SWAN-venule images from 3 patients with RRMS. Lesions seen in FLAIR are visible in SWAN-venule. White boxes mark lesions magnified in 3 planes. A, White box magnifies a deep white matter lesion. B, White box magnifies a periventricular lesion. C, White box magnifies a juxtacortical lesion.

RESULTS

Participants

The complete brain MR imaging protocol was performed on 30 patients with MS. A total of 20 patients who presented with >3 supratentorial WMLs were included. Demographic and clinical information of the patients is the following: 19 with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); 1 with primary-progressive MS; 11 women and 9 men; mean age, 38.9 years; range, 34.8–42.9 years; mean disease duration, 5.8 years; range, 3.7–7.9 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score range, 0–6.

White Matter Lesions

A total of 380 WMLs were analyzed, of which 135 were periventricular, 144 were deep white matter, and 101 were juxtacortical.

Central Vein Sign

Overall, 86% of the lesions (327/380) presented with the CVS. The agreement coefficient among the evaluators was 93%, with a substantial reliability of 0.71 (range, 0.61–0.81) (Cohen κ). When the lesions were classified according to their location, the central vein was detected in 89% of periventricular lesions, 95% of deep white matter lesions, and 78% of juxtacortical lesions (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

SWAN-venule acquired in 3 subjects with RRMS. A, Examples of lesions with central veins in 3 planes. In each raw, arrows point the same lesion in three different planes. An example of a deep white matter (DWM) lesion, a periventricular lesion, and a juxtacortical lesion shows the central vein in 3 different planes. B, Example of 2 deep white matter lesions that developed along the same vein. PV indicates periventricular; JC, juxtacortical.

DISCUSSION

The overinterpretation of focal nonspecific white matter lesions is an important factor contributing to MS misdiagnosis, mainly by erroneously fulfilling the radiologic criterion of dissemination in space.19 Therefore, there is an urgent need for the use of a novel radiologic biomarker specific to MS, such as the central vein sign.

In this work, an optimized SWAN sequence, called SWAN-venule, is proposed for imaging the central vein sign using 3T MR imaging. To our knowledge, there is only 1 publication that evaluated the performance of the standard SWAN sequence for detecting the CVS.15 Unlike this smaller prior study, we were able to detect 86% of CVSs when using SWAN-venule with contrast. As mentioned by the authors, it was difficult to visualize WMLs on SWAN images. We observed the same issue at our center when using the standard SWAN protocol. This problem was solved by our new SWAN-venule protocol, which uses a lower flip angle, improving the tissue contrast (Fig 3). The increased sensitivity of our optimized MR imaging technique may also be due to the reduction in the voxel dimensions, allowing better capturing of small venules. Note that the use of high image resolution for SWAN-venule required a 32-channel head coil array for providing sufficient SNR. Another possible contribution is the injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent during the acquisition. As previously shown, gadolinium increases the phase effects around blood vessels, increasing the visibility of small veins.14,16 Because the recommended MR imaging brain protocols for MS20,21 require the intravenous injection of contrast followed by a 5-minute delay before the T1-weighted scan, acquiring SWAN-venule during the delay will not increase the overall scan time of the protocol. This higher percentage of WMLs centered by veins is in line with previous studies investigating the CVS in patients with MS at 7T3,4 or using optimized techniques at 3T, such as T2*-weighted 3D-EPI or FLAIR.9,13,16,22,23 Because of the use of small voxel dimensions and the 3D acquisition mode, SWAN-venule images could also be combined with 3D-FLAIR images to generate FLAIR* contrast,24 thus facilitating the workflow of the CVS evaluation by requiring reading only 1 contrast image.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Quality comparison between standard SWAN and SWAN-venule. Comparison of SWAN and SWAN-venule acquired during the same year in 2 subjects with RRMS who were radiologically stable. Arrows point to lesions in SWAN-venule and the same area in SWAN, in which lesions are difficult to depict. A–C, A 28-year-old female patient with RRMS. D and E, A 31-year-old male patient with RRMS.

Although our image analysis focused on the supratentorial brain of patients with MS, we observed that most lesions visible in the brain stem and cerebellum also showed the CVS (Fig 4), similar to a previous study imaging infratentorial MS brains.2 Moreover, we found a very high percentage (95%) of deep white matter lesions centered by veins. Therefore, the inclusion of CVS-positive deep white matter lesions in future revisions of the McDonald criteria could help to achieve a more accurate and earlier MS diagnosis. Finally, recent data showed that cases of radiologically isolated syndrome can have a high proportion of CVS-positive lesions.25 Therefore, CVS appears to be a radiologic biomarker present even in the presymptomatic phase of the disease.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Axial FLAIR and SWAN-venule from 3 patients with RRMS. Arrow points to infratentorial lesions in FLAIR. Arrowhead points to the corresponding central vein in SWAN-venule.

One of the limitations of our study is that we did not perform a head-to-head comparison of the conventional SWAN sequence versus our newly optimized SWAN-venule sequence. Another limitation is the relatively long acquisition time (∼7–8 minutes) of our SWAN-venule sequence, which most likely increases the risk of motion artifacts. Last, comprehensive MR imaging analysis, such as localized gray matter atrophy, which has a strong correlation with disease disability or progression, was not performed. Further work is needed to characterize the CVS as a potential biomarker for predicting disease severity and monitoring progression.

CONCLUSIONS

We introduce an optimized susceptibility-based MR imaging sequence, called SWAN-venule, a dedicated long-acquisition postcontrast imaging for sensitive detection of central veins inside brain lesions at 3T. MR imaging centers equipped with a clinical 3T system can easily integrate this optimized clinically available sequence, thus providing radiologists and neurologists with the opportunity to assess the clinical value of the CVS as an imaging biomarker for the differential diagnosis of MS.

Acknowledgment

Dr Sati is supported by the Intramural Research Program of NINDS.

Footnotes

  • Paper previously presented at: Annual Meeting of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, September 11–13, 2019; Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Disclosures: Maria Ines Gaitán—RELATED: Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Merck Serono Argentina, Comments: travel/accommodations/meeting expenses to European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis 2019, where I presented part of the data; UNRELATED: Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: Biogen Argentina, Merck Serono Argentina, Novartis Argentina; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Biogen Argentina, Merck Serono Argentina, Roche Argentina. Eduardo Figueiredo—UNRELATED: Employment: GE Healthcare. Jorge Correale—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Merck Serono Argentina, Biogen Argentina, Biogen Global, Genzyme Argentina, Genzyme Global, Novartis Argentina, Roche Argentina; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Merck Serono Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Roche Argentina, Biogen Argentina; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Merck Serono Argentina.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Adams CW
    . The onset and progression of the lesion in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1975;25:165–82 doi:10.1016/0022-510x(75)90138-0 pmid:1151432
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tan IL,
    2. van Schijndel RA,
    3. Pouwels PJ, et al
    . MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1039–42 pmid:10871010
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tallantyre EC,
    2. Brookes MJ,
    3. Dixon JE, et al
    . Demonstrating the perivascular distribution of MS lesions in vivo with 7-Tesla MRI. Neurology 2008;70:2076–78 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000313377.49555.2e pmid:18505982
    FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tallantyre EC,
    2. Morgan PS,
    3. Dixon JE, et al
    . A comparison of 3T and 7T in the detection of small parenchymal veins within MS lesions. Invest Radiol 2009;44:491–94 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c144 pmid:19652606
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sati P,
    2. Oh J,
    3. Constable RT, et al
    ; NAIMS Cooperative. The central vein sign and its clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement from the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:714–22 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.166 pmid:27834394
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kilsdonk ID,
    2. Lopez-Soriano A,
    3. Kuijer JP, et al
    . Morphological features of MS lesions on FLAIR* at 7T and their relation to patient characteristics. J Neurol 2014;261:1356–64 doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7351-6 pmid:24777693
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kuchling J,
    2. Ramien C,
    3. Bozin I, et al
    . Identical lesion morphology in primary progressive and relapsing-remitting MS: an ultrahigh field MRI study. Mult Scler 2014;20:1866–71 doi:10.1177/1352458514531084 pmid:24781284
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cortese R,
    2. Magnollay L,
    3. Tur C, et al
    . Value of the central vein sign at 3T to differentiate MS from seropositive NMOSD. Neurology 2018;90:e1183–90 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005256 pmid:29514948
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Maggi P,
    2. Absinta M,
    3. Grammatico M, et al
    . Central vein sign differentiates multiple sclerosis from central nervous system inflammatory vasculopathies. Ann Neurol 2018;83:283–94 doi:10.1002/ana.25146 pmid:29328521
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kilsdonk ID,
    2. Wattjes MP,
    3. Lopez-Soriano A, et al
    . Improved differentiation between MS and vascular brain lesions using FLAIR* at 7 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2014;24:841–49 doi:10.1007/s00330-013-3080-y pmid:24317461
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wuerfel J,
    2. Sinnecker T,
    3. Ringelstein EB, et al
    . Lesion morphology at 7 Tesla MRI differentiates Susac syndrome from multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18:1592–99 doi:10.1177/1352458512441270 pmid:22711711
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sinnecker T,
    2. Clarke MA,
    3. Meier D, et al
    ; MAGNIMS Study Group. Evaluation of the central vein sign as a diagnostic imaging biomarker in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2019 Aug 19. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2478] pmid:31424490
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Solomon AJ,
    2. Schindler MK,
    3. Howard DB, et al
    . “Central vessel sign” on 3T FLAIR* MRI for the differentiation of multiple sclerosis from migraine. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016;3:82–87 doi:10.1002/acn3.273 pmid:26900578
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sati P,
    2. Thomasson DM,
    3. Li N, et al
    . Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014;20:1464–70 doi:10.1177/1352458514525868 pmid:24639479
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Samaraweera AP,
    2. Clarke MA,
    3. Whitehead A, et al
    . The central vein sign in multiple sclerosis lesions is present irrespective of the T2* sequence at 3 T. J Neuroimaging 2017;27:114–21 doi:10.1111/jon.12367 pmid:27300318
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dixon JE,
    2. Simpson A,
    3. Mistry N, et al
    . Optimisation of T(2)*-weighted MRI for the detection of small veins in multiple sclerosis at 3 T and 7 T. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:719–27 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.023 pmid:22138119
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Filippi M,
    2. Rocca MA,
    3. Ciccarelli O, et al
    ; MAGNIMS Study Group. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:292–303 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2 pmid:26822746
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Thompson AJ,
    2. Banwell BL,
    3. Barkhof F, et al
    . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Solomon AJ,
    2. Bourdette DN,
    3. Cross AH, et al
    . The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology 2016;87:1393–99 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003152 pmid:27581217
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maggi P,
    2. Absinta M,
    3. Sati P, et al
    . The “central vein sign” in patients with diagnostic “red flags” for multiple sclerosis: a prospective multicenter 3T study. Mult Scler 2019 Sep 19. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/1352458519876031 pmid:31536435
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Campion T,
    2. Smith RJ,
    3. Altmann DR, et al
    . FLAIR* to visualize veins in white matter lesions: a new tool for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis? Eur Radiology 2017;27:4257–63 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4822-z pmid:28409356
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wattjes MP,
    2. Rovira A,
    3. Miller D, et al
    ; MAGNIMS study group. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis–establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:597–606 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 pmid:26369511
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rovira A,
    2. Wattjes MP,
    3. Tintore M, et al
    ; MAGNIMS study group. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:471–82 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.106 pmid:26149978
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sati P,
    2. George IC,
    3. Shea CD, et al
    . FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Radiology 2012;265:926–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120208 pmid:23074257
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Suthiphosuwan S,
    2. Sati P,
    3. Guenette M, et al
    . The central vein sign in radiologically isolated syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:776–83 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6045 pmid:31000526
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 1, 2019.
  • Accepted after revision January 8, 2020.
  • © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 41 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 41, Issue 3
1 Mar 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SWAN-Venule: An Optimized MRI Technique to Detect the Central Vein Sign in MS Plaques
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.I. Gaitán, P. Yañez, M.E. Paday Formenti, I. Calandri, E. Figueiredo, P. Sati, J. Correale
SWAN-Venule: An Optimized MRI Technique to Detect the Central Vein Sign in MS Plaques
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2020, 41 (3) 456-460; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6437

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
SWAN-Venule: An Optimized MRI Technique to Detect the Central Vein Sign in MS Plaques
M.I. Gaitán, P. Yañez, M.E. Paday Formenti, I. Calandri, E. Figueiredo, P. Sati, J. Correale
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2020, 41 (3) 456-460; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6437
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (17)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The Use of the Central Vein Sign in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Marco Castellaro, Agnese Tamanti, Anna Isabella Pisani, Francesca Benedetta Pizzini, Francesco Crescenzo, Massimiliano Calabrese
    Diagnostics 2020 10 12
  • Latin American consensus recommendations for management and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in clinical practice
    Edgar Carnero Contentti, Juan Ignacio Rojas, Edgardo Cristiano, Vanessa Daccach Marques, José Flores-Rivera, Marco Lana-Peixoto, Carlos Navas, Regina Papais-Alvarenga, Douglas K. Sato, Ibis Soto de Castillo, Jorge Correale
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2020 45
  • Cortical lesions, central vein sign, and paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis: Emerging machine learning techniques and future avenues
    Francesco La Rosa, Maxence Wynen, Omar Al-Louzi, Erin S Beck, Till Huelnhagen, Pietro Maggi, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Tobias Kober, Russell T Shinohara, Pascal Sati, Daniel S Reich, Cristina Granziera, Martina Absinta, Meritxell Bach Cuadra
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2022 36
  • Autoimmune diseases of the brain, imaging and clinical review
    Ghazal Shadmani, Tyrell J Simkins, Reza Assadsangabi, Michelle Apperson, Lotfi Hacein-Bey, Osama Raslan, Vladimir Ivanovic
    The Neuroradiology Journal 2022 35 2
  • Central vein sign and diffusion MRI differentiate microstructural features within white matter lesions of multiple sclerosis patients with comorbidities
    Caterina Lapucci, Francesco Tazza, Silvia Rebella, Giacomo Boffa, Elvira Sbragia, Nicolò Bruschi, Elisabetta Mancuso, Nicola Mavilio, Alessio Signori, Luca Roccatagliata, Maria Cellerino, Simona Schiavi, Matilde Inglese
    Frontiers in Neurology 2023 14
  • Central vein sign: A putative diagnostic marker for multiple sclerosis
    Lara Chaaban, Nancy Safwan, Hussein Moussa, Sally El‐Sammak, Samia J. Khoury, Salem Hannoun
    Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2022 145 3
  • New Imaging Markers in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
    Christopher C. Hemond, María I. Gaitán, Martina Absinta, Daniel S. Reich
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2024 34 3
  • The central vein sign is present in most infratentorial multiple sclerosis plaques
    María Inés Gaitán, María Emilia Paday Formenti, Ismael Calandri, María Célica Ysrraelit, Paulina Yañez, Jorge Correale
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2022 58
  • A symptom of the central vein in various diseases and protocols of MRI examination
    S.E. Belov, A.N. Boyko
    Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova 2022 122 7
  • Central vein sign for differential diagnosis of demyelinating diseases of CNS
    SE Belov, IL Gubsky, VG Lelyuk, AN Boyko
    Medicine of Extreme Situations 2021 2021(3)

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
  • NCCT vs. MRI for Brain Atrophy in Acute Stroke
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire