Fractional Flow on TOF-MRA as a Measure of Stroke Risk in Children with Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Heideman RL,
   2. Packer RJ,
   3. Albright LA, et al

   . Tumors of the central nervous system. In: Pizzo PA, ed. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott; 1997:633–97
2. 2.↵
   National Center for Health Statistics. Deaths, percentage of total deaths, and death rates for the 10 leading causes of death in selected age groups, by race and sex in the United States. 2002. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr53/nvsr53_17.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2019
3. 3.↵
   1. Giroud M,
   2. Lemesle M,
   3. Madinier G, et al

   . Stroke in children under 16 years of age: clinical and etiological difference with adults. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;96:401–06 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00306.x pmid:9449480

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Lynch JK,
   2. Hirtz DG,
   3. DeVeber G, et al

   . Report of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop on Perinatal and Childhood Stroke. Pediatrics 2002;109:116–23 doi:10.1542/peds.109.1.116 pmid:11773550

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Chung B,
   2. Wong V

   . Pediatric stroke among Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Pediatrics 2004;114:e206–12 doi:10.1542/peds.114.2.e206 pmid:15286258

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fullerton HJ,
   2. Wu YW,
   3. Zhao S, et al

   . Risk of stroke in children: ethnic and gender disparities. Neurology 2003;61:189–94 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000078894.79866.95 pmid:12874397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Fullerton HJ,
   2. Wu YW,
   3. Sidney S, et al

   . Risk of recurrent childhood arterial ischemic stroke in a population-based cohort: the importance of cerebrovascular imaging. Pediatrics 2007;119:495–501 doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2791 pmid:17332202

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Ganesan V,
   2. Prengler M,
   3. McShane MA, et al

   . Investigation of risk factors in children with arterial ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2003;53:167–73 doi:10.1002/ana.10423 pmid:12557282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Sträter R,
   2. Becker S,
   3. von Eckardstein A, et al

   . Prospective assessment of risk factors for recurrent stroke during childhood: a 5-year follow-up study. Lancet 2002;360:1540–05 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11520-0 pmid:12443591

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Chabrier S,
    2. Husson B,
    3. Lasjaunias P, et al

    . Stroke in childhood: outcome and recurrence risk by mechanism in 59 patients. J Child Neurol 2000;15:290–94 doi:10.1177/088307380001500504 pmid:10830194

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Zimmer JA,
    2. Garg BP,
    3. Williams LS, et al

    . Age-related variation in presenting signs of childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Pediatr Neurol 2007;37:171–75 doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.05.010 pmid:17765804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Hills NK,
    3. DeVeber GA, et al

    ; VIPS Investigators. Clinical and imaging characteristics of arteriopathy subtypes in children with arterial ischemic stroke: results of the VIPS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2172–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5376 pmid:28982784

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Sébire G,
    2. Fullerton H,
    3. Riou E, et al

    . Toward the definition of cerebral arteriopathies of childhood. Curr Opin Pediatr 2004;16:617–22 doi:10.1097/01.mop.0000144441.29899.20 pmid:15548922

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Sébire G,
    2. Meyer L,
    3. Chabrier S

    . Varicella as a risk factor for cerebral infarction in childhood: a case‐control study. Ann Neurol 1999;45:679–80 doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199905)45:5<679::aid-ana22>3.0.co;2-e pmid:10319896

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Earley CJ,
    2. Kittner SJ,
    3. Feeser BR, et al

    . Stroke in children and sickle-cell disease: Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study. Neurology 1998;51:169–76 doi:10.1212/wnl.51.1.169 pmid:9674798

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Pandey S,
    2. Hakky M,
    3. Kwak E, et al

    . Application of basic principles of physics to head and neck MR angiography: troubleshooting for artifacts. Radiographics 2013;33:e113–23 doi:10.1148/rg.333125148 pmid:23674781

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Corfield L,
    2. Speirs A,
    3. McCormack DJ, et al

    . Time of flight magnetic resonance angiography: a trap for the unwary. EJVES Extra 2010;19:e35–37 doi:10.1016/j.ejvsextra.2010.01.002

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Takhtani D,
    2. Dundamadappa S,
    3. Puri AS, et al

    . Flow artifact in the anterior communicating artery resembling aneurysm on the time of flight MR angiogram. Acta Radiol 2014;55:1253–57 doi:10.1177/0284185113520153 pmid:24413225

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Silvennoinen HM,
    2. Ikonen S,
    3. Soinne L, et al

    . CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:97–103 pmid:17213433

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. van den Wijngaard IR,
    2. Holswilder G,
    3. van Walderveen MA, et al

    . Treatment and imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: current perspectives and future directions. Brain Behav 2016;6:e00536 doi:10.1002/brb3.536 pmid:27843693

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Caplan LR

    . Intracranial atherosclerosis. Lancet 2014;383:984–98 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61088-0 pmid:24007975

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Lan L,
    2. Leng X,
    3. Abrigo J, et al

    . Diminished signal intensities distal to intracranial arterial stenosis on time-of-flight MR angiography might indicate delayed cerebral perfusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:232–39 doi:10.1159/000445842 pmid:27173386

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Miura M,
    2. Nakajima M,
    3. Fujimoto A, et al

    . Decreased signal intensity ratio on MRA reflects misery perfusion on SPECT in patients with intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2018;28:206–11 doi:10.1111/jon.12489 pmid:29215168

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Samuels OB,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al

    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46 pmid:10782772

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Hankey GJ,
    2. Warlow CP,
    3. Molyneux AJ

    . Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:542–48 doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.7.542 pmid:2118171

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Davies KN,
    2. Humphrey PR

    . Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:967–72 doi:10.1136/jnnp.56.9.967 pmid:8410036

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Johnston DC,
    2. Chapman KM,
    3. Goldstein LB

    . Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001;57:2012–14 doi:10.1212/wnl.57.11.2012 pmid:11739818

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Kosinski AS,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al

    . Noninvasive fractional flow on MRA predicts stroke risk of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:87–91 doi:10.1111/jon.12101 pmid:24593693

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Matsuo S,
    2. Nakamizo A,
    3. Fujioka Y, et al

    . Time-of-flight MRA signal intensity predicts the cerebral hemodynamic status after superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery anastomosis. J Clin Neurosci 2019;59:124–29 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.116 pmid:30396815

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Leng X,
    2. Ip HL,
    3. Soo Y, et al

    . Interobserver reproducibility of signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance angiography for hemodynamic impact of intracranial atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:e615–19 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.036 pmid:24075586

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Verlhac S,
    2. Bernaudin F,
    3. Tortrat D, et al

    . Detection of cerebrovascular disease in patients with sickle cell disease using transcranial Doppler sonography: correlation with MRI, MRA and catheter angiography. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:S14–19

    PubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Kandeel AY,
    2. Zimmerman RA,
    3. Ohene-Frempong K, et al

    . Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and catheter angiography in sickle cell disease: clinical significance and reliability. Neuroradiology 1996;38:409–16 doi:10.1007/bf00607263 pmid:8837081

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Koo BK,
    2. Erglis A,
    3. Doh JH, et al

    . Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1989–97 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066 pmid:22032711

    FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Min JK,
    2. Koo BK,
    3. Erglis A, et al

    . Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:971–76 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.033 pmid:22749390

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Chazen JL,
    3. Hartman M, et al

    . Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012;43:2884–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663716 pmid:23091119

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Baradaran H,
    2. Patel P,
    3. Gialdini G, et al

    . Quantifying intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis on MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:986–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5113 pmid:28302605

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Howlett-Smith H, et al

    ; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043033 pmid:15800226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Hirooka R,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Inoue T, et al

    . Simple assessment of cerebral hemodynamics using single-slab 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive diseases: comparison with quantitative perfusion single-photon emission CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:559–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1389 pmid:19039042

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Miralles M,
    2. Dolz JL,
    3. Cotillas J, et al

    . The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion: assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:424–30 doi:10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80164-9 pmid:7489210

    CrossRefPubMed