Brain Metastases: Insights from Statistical Modeling of Size Distribution

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Rubner M

   . Uber den Einfluss der Körpergröβe auf Stoff-und Kraftwechsel. Zeitschrift für Biologie 1883;19:535–62
2. 2.↵
   1. Kleiber M

   . Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 1932;6:315–53 doi:10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315

   CrossRef
3. 3.↵
   1. Bohorquez JC,
   2. Gourley S,
   3. Dixon AR, et al

   . Common ecology quantifies human insurgency. Nature 2009;462:911–14 doi:10.1038/nature08631 pmid:20016600

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Brown JH,
   2. Gupta VK,
   3. Li BL, et al

   . The fractal nature of nature: power laws, ecological complexity and biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002;357:619–26 doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0993 pmid:12079523

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Bru A,
   2. Albertos S,
   3. Luis Subiza J, et al

   . The universal dynamics of tumor growth. Biophys J 2003;85:2948–61 doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74715-8 pmid:14581197

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.
   1. Gatenby RA,
   2. Frieden BR

   . Information dynamics in carcinogenesis and tumor growth. Mutat Res 2004;568:259–73 doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.04.018 pmid:15542113

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Hart D,
   2. Shochat E,
   3. Agur Z

   . The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data. Br J Cancer 1998;78:382–87 doi:10.1038/bjc.1998.503 pmid:9703287

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Vainstein V,
   2. Kirnasovsky OU,
   3. Kogan Y, et al

   . Strategies for cancer stem cell elimination: insights from mathematical modeling. J Theor Biol 2012;298:32–41 doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.016 pmid:22210402

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Hochman G,
   2. Kogan Y,
   3. Vainstein V

   . Evidence for power law tumor growth and implications for cancer radiotherapy. http://www.imbm.org/PDF/HKVetal.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2017
10. 10.↵
    1. Malek A,

    1. Scott JG,
    2. Gerlee P,
    3. Basanta D

    . Mathematical modeling of the metastatic process. In: Malek A, ed. Experimental Metastasis: Modeling and Analysis Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands; 2013:189–208
11. 11.↵
    1. Ruggiero RA,
    2. Bruzzo J,
    3. Chiarella P, et al

    . Tyrosine isomers mediate the classical phenomenon of concomitant tumor resistance. Cancer Res 2011;71:7113–24 doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0581 pmid:22084446

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Ruggiero RA,
    2. Bruzzo J,
    3. Chiarella P, et al

    . Concomitant tumor resistance: the role of tyrosine isomers in the mechanisms of metastases control. Cancer Res 2012;72:1043–50 doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2964 pmid:22315349

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Gershon RK,
    2. Carter RL

    . Factors controlling concomitant immunity in tumor-bearing hamsters: effects of prior splenectomy and tumor removal. J Natl Cancer Inst 1969;43:533–43 pmid:5821115

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Gorelik E,
    2. Segal S,
    3. Feldman M

    . On the mechanism of tumor “concomitant immunity. Int J Cancer 1981;27:847–56 doi:10.1002/ijc.2910270618 pmid:7287231

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. O’Reilly MS,
    2. Holmgren L,
    3. Shing Y, et al

    . Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell 1994;79:315–28 doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90200-3 pmid:7525077

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Erlich P

    . Experimentelle Karzinomstudien an Maüsen. Arb Aus Dem K Inst Für Exp Ther Zu Frankf Am Main 1906;75–102
17. 17.↵
    1. O’Reilly MS,
    2. Boehm T,
    3. Shing Y, et al

    . Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell 1997;88:277–85 doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81848-6 pmid:9008168

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Benzekry S,
    2. Lamont C,
    3. Barbolosi D, et al

    . Mathematical modeling of tumor-tumor distant interactions supports a systemic control of tumor growth. Cancer Res 2017;77:5183–93 doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0564 pmid:28729417

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Clauset A,
    2. Shalizi CR,
    3. Newman ME

    . Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 2009;51:661–703 doi:10.1137/070710111

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science