Reliability of CT Angiography in Cerebral Vasospasm: A Systematic Review of the Literature and an Inter- and Intraobserver Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Macdonald RL

   . Origins of the concept of vasospasm. Stroke 2016;47:e11–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006498 pmid:26337970

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Budohoski KP,
   2. Guilfoyle M,
   3. Helmy A, et al

   . The pathophysiology and treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia following subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:1343–53 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307711 pmid:24847164

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Findlay JM,
   2. Nisar J,
   3. Darsaut T

   . Cerebral vasospasm: a review. Can J Neurol Sci 2016;43:15–32 doi:10.1017/cjn.2015.288 pmid:26332908

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Francoeur CL,
   2. Mayer SA

   . Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care 2016;20:277 doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6 pmid:27737684

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Greenberg ED,
   2. Gold R,
   3. Reichman M, et al

   . Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography and CT perfusion for cerebral vasospasm: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1853–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2246 pmid:20884748

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Chaudhary SR,
   2. Ko N,
   3. Dillon WP, et al

   . Prospective evaluation of multidetector-row CT angiography for the diagnosis of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25:144–50 doi:10.1159/000112325 pmid:18073468

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Shankar JJ,
   2. Tan IY,
   3. Krings T, et al

   . CT angiography for evaluation of cerebral vasospasm following acute subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neuroradiology 2012;54:197–203 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0876-9 pmid:21541687

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Binaghi S,
   2. Colleoni ML,
   3. Maeder P, et al

   . CT angiography and perfusion CT in cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:750–58 pmid:17416833

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Moher D,
   2. Liberati A,
   3. Tetzlaff J, et al

   ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–12 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 pmid:19631508

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Kottner J,
    2. Audige L,
    3. Brorson S, et al

    . Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96–106 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 pmid:21130355

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Donner A,
    2. Rotondi MA

    . Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters. Int J Biostat 2010;6:Article 31 doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1275 pmid:21969984

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Rotondi M

    . kappaSize: sample size estimation functions for studies of interobserver agreement. R package version 1.1 2013. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=kappaSize. Accessed January 10, 2018
13. 13.↵
    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.4.4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2018. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed April 2, 2018
14. 14.↵
    1. Cruz JP,
    2. Sarma D,
    3. Noel de Tilly L

    . Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: when to stop imaging? Emerg Radiol 2011;18:197–202 doi:10.1007/s10140-011-0939-6 pmid:21360167

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Budohoski KP,
    2. Czosnyka M,
    3. Kirkpatrick PJ, et al

    . Clinical relevance of cerebral autoregulation following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:152–63 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.11 pmid:23419369

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Lazaridis C,
    2. Naval N

    . Risk factors and medical management of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010;21:353–64 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2009.10.006 pmid:20380975

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Feinstein AR,
    2. Cicchetti DV

    . High agreement but low kappa, I: the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L pmid:2348207

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Cicchetti DV,
    2. Feinstein AR

    . High agreement but low kappa, II: resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:551–58 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-m pmid:2189948

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Quarfoot D,
    2. Levine RA

    . How robust are multirater interrater reliability indices to changes in frequency distribution? The American Statistician 2016;70:373–84 doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1141708

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Hunt WE,
    2. Hess RM

    . Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20 doi:10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014 pmid:5635959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Frontera JA,
    2. Claassen J,
    3. Schmidt JM, et al

    . Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 2006;59:21–27; discussion 21–27 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000218821.34014.1B pmid:16823296

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Takagi R,
    2. Hayashi H,
    3. Kobayashi H, et al

    . Three-dimensional CT angiography of intracranial vasospasm following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neuroradiology 1998;40:631–35 doi:10.1007/s002340050654 pmid:9833891

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Gamer M,
    2. Lemon J,
    3. Fellows I, et al

    . irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr. Accessed June 1, 2018
24. 24.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Farzin B,
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Pham M, et al

    . Agreement studies in radiology research. Diagn Interv Imaging 2017;98:227–33 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2016.05.014 pmid:27473190

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Scaling back on scales with a scale of scales. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:219–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2432 pmid:21183620

    FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Kelly PJ,
    2. Gorten RJ,
    3. Grossman RG, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion, vascular spasm, and outcome in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1977;47:44–49 doi:10.3171/jns.1977.47.1.0044 pmid:864506

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Ohkuma H,
    2. Manabe H,
    3. Tanaka M, et al

    . Impact of cerebral microcirculatory changes on cerebral blood flow during cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2000;31:1621–27 doi:10.1161/01.str.31.7.1621 pmid:10884463

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Voldby B,
    2. Enevoldsen EM,
    3. Jensen FT

    . Regional CBF, intraventricular pressure, and cerebral metabolism in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1985;62:48–58 doi:10.3171/jns.1985.62.1.0048 pmid:3964855

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Lodi CA,
    2. Ursino M

    . Hemodynamic effect of cerebral vasospasm in humans: a modeling study. Ann Biomed Eng 1999;27:257–73 doi:10.1114/1.168 pmid:10199702

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Lucas NP,
    2. Macaskill P,
    3. Irwig L, et al

    . The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:854–61 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.002 pmid:20056381

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Winklhofer S,
    2. Hinzpeter R,
    3. Stocker D, et al

    . Combining monoenergetic extrapolations from dual-energy CT with iterative reconstructions: reduction of coil and clip artifacts from intracranial aneurysm therapy. Neuroradiology 2018;60:281–91 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-1981-9 pmid:29356855

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Barth J,
    2. de Boer WE,
    3. Busse JW, et al

    . Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies. BMJ 2017;356:14 doi:10.1136/bmj.j14 pmid:28122727

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Spanjer J,
    2. Krol B,
    3. Brouwer S, et al

    . Sources of variation in work disability assessment. Work 2010;37:405–11 doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-1094 pmid:21099015

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Gwet KL

    . Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics; 2014
36. 36.
    1. Schneck SA,
    2. Kricheff, II.

    . Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture, Vasospasm, and Infarction. Arch Neurol 1964;11:668–80 doi:10.1001/archneur.1964.00460240100013 pmid:14202184

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.
    1. Kassell NF,
    2. Helm G,
    3. Simmons N, et al

    . Treatment of cerebral vasospasm with intra-arterial papaverine. J Neurosurg 1992;77:848–52 doi:10.3171/jns.1992.77.6.0848 pmid:1432125

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.
    1. Anderson GB,
    2. Ashforth R,
    3. Steinke DE, et al

    . CT angiography for the detection of cerebral vasospasm in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2000;21:1011–15 pmid:10871004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.
    1. Otawara Y,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Ogawa A, et al

    . Evaluation of Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage by Use of Multislice Computed Tomographic Angiography. Neurosurgery 2002;51:939–43 doi:10.1097/00006123-200210000-00015 pmid:12234400

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.
    1. Yoon DY,
    2. Choi CS,
    3. Kim KH, et al

    . Multidetector-Row CT Angiography of Cerebral Vasospasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Comparison of Volume-Rendered Images and Digital Subtraction Angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2006;27:370–77 pmid:16484413

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.
    1. Joo SP,
    2. Kim TS,
    3. Kim YS, et al

    . Clinical utility of multislice computed tomographic angiography for detection of cerebral vasospasm in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006;49:286–90 doi:10.1055/s-2006-954826 pmid:17163342

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.
    1. Aralasmak A,
    2. Akyuz M,
    3. Ozkaynak C, et al

    . CT angiography and perfusion imaging in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: correlation of vasospasm to perfusion abnormality. Neuroradiology 2009;51:85–93 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0466-7 pmid:18850093

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Zhang B,
    3. Li S, et al

    . Whole brain CT perfusion combined with CT angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2013;115:2496–501 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.10.004 pmid:24210268

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.
    1. Danura H,
    2. Schatlo B,
    3. Marbacher S, et al

    . Acute angiographic vasospasm and the incidence of delayed cerebral vasospasm: preliminary results. Acta neurochirurgica Supplement 2015;120:187–90 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_32 pmid:25366622

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.
    1. Stecco A,
    2. Fabbiano F,
    3. Amatuzzo P, et al

    . Computed tomography perfusion and computed tomography angiography in vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of neurosurgical sciences 2018;62:397–405 doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03622-5 pmid:27124176

    CrossRefPubMed