High Spatiotemporal Resolution 4D Flow MRI of Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T in 10 Minutes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Steiner T,
   2. Juvela S,
   3. Unterberg A, et al

   . European stroke organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;35:93–112 doi:10.1159/000346087 pmid:23406828

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Thompson BG,
   2. Brown RD,
   3. Amin-Hanjani S, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2015;46:2368–2400 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000070 pmid:26089327

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Markl M,
   2. Frydrychowicz A,
   3. Kozerke S, et al

   . 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1015–36 doi:10.1002/jmri.23632 pmid:23090914

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. van Ooij P,
   2. Potters WV,
   3. Guédon A, et al

   . Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:876–84 doi:10.1002/jmri.2405]1 pmid:23417769

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Coolen BF,
   2. Calcagno C,
   3. van Ooij P, et al

   . Vessel wall characterization using quantitative MRI: what’s in a number? MAGMA 2018;31:201–22 doi:10.1007/s10334-017-0644-x pmid:28808823

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Boussel L,
   2. Rayz V,
   3. McCulloch C, et al

   . Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997–3002 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617 pmid:18688012

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Chung BJ,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Putman CM, et al

   . Identification of hostile hemodynamics and geometries of cerebral aneurysms: a case-control study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1860–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5764 pmid:30166431

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Blankena R,
   2. Kleinloog R,
   3. Verweij BH, et al

   . Thinner regions of intracranial aneurysm wall correlate with regions of higher wall shear stress: a 7T MRI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1310–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4734] pmid:26892986

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Detmer F,
   3. Chung BJ, et al

   . Local hemodynamic conditions associated with focal changes in the intracranial aneurysm wall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:510–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5970 30733253 pmid:30733253

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. van Ooij P,
    2. Zwanenburg JJM,
    3. Visser F, et al

    . Quantification and visualization of flow in the circle of Willis: time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI at 7 T compared with 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:868–76 doi:10.1002/mrm.24317 pmid:22618854

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ku DN,
    2. Giddens DP,
    3. Phillips DJ, et al

    . Hemodynamics of the normal human carotid bifurcation: in vitro and in vivo studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:13–26 pmid:3160152

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Cibis M,
    2. Potters WV,
    3. Gijsen FJ, et al

    . The effect of spatial and temporal resolution of cine phase contrast MRI on wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index assessment. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163316–15 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163316 pmid:27669568

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Boussel L,
    2. Rayz V,
    3. Martin A, et al

    . Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;6:409–17 doi:10.1002/mrm.21861 pmid:19161132

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lustig M,
    2. Donoho D,
    3. Pauly JM

    . Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Peper ES,
    2. Gottwald LM,
    3. Zhang Q, et al

    . Highly accelerated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using a pseudo-spiral Cartesian acquisition and compressed sensing reconstruction for carotid flow and wall shear stress. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020;22:7 doi:10.1186/s12968-019-0582-z pmid:31959203

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Gottwald LM,
    2. Peper ES,
    3. Zhang Q, et al

    . Pseudo-spiral sampling and compressed sensing reconstruction provides flexibility of temporal resolution in accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI: a comparison with K-T principal component analysis. NMR Biomed 2020;33:e4255 doi:10.1002/nbm.4255 pmid:31957927

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Uecker M,
    2. Ong F,
    3. Tamir JI, et al

    . Berkeley advanced reconstruction toolbox. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 30 to June 5, 2015; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2486
18. 18.↵
    1. Heiberg E,
    2. Sjögren J,
    3. Ugander M, et al

    . Design and validation of Segment: freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC Med Imaging 2010;10:1 doi:10.1186/1471-2342-10-1 pmid:20064248

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Bouvy WH,
    2. Geurts LJ,
    3. Kuijf HJ, et al

    . Assessment of blood flow velocity and pulsatility in cerebral perforating arteries with 7-T quantitative flow MRI. NMR Biomed 2016;29:1295–1304 doi:10.1002/nbm.3306 pmid:25916399

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Bock J,
    2. Frydrychowicz A,
    3. Stalder AF, et al

    . 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:330–38 doi:10.1002/mrm.22199 pmid:20024953

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Potters WV,
    2. van Ooij P,
    3. Marquering H, et al

    . Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:505–16 doi:10.1002/jmri.24560 pmid:24436246

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Cheng JY,
    2. Hanneman K,
    3. Zhang T, et al

    . Comprehensive motion-compensated highly accelerated 4D flow MRI with ferumoxytol enhancement for pediatric congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43:1355–68 doi:10.1002/jmri.25106 pmid:26646061

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Walheim J,
    2. Dillinger H,
    3. Kozerke S

    . Multipoint 5D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - accelerated cardiac- and respiratory-motion resolved mapping of mean and turbulent velocities. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2019;21:42 doi:10.1186/s12968-019-0549-0 pmid:31331353

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Rich A,
    2. Potter LC,
    3. Jin N, et al

    . A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:689–701 doi:10.1002/mrm.25904 pmid:26444911

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Gu T,
    2. Korosec FR,
    3. Block WF, et al

    . PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49 pmid:15814915

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Shojima M,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Takagi K, et al

    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f pmid:15514200

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Mantha A,
    2. Karmonik C,
    3. Benndorf G, et al

    . Hemodynamics in a cerebral artery before and after the formation of an aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1113–18 pmid:16687554

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Schnell S,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Ansari SA

    . Four-dimensional MRI flow examinations in cerebral and extracerebral vessels: ready for clinical routine? Curr Opin Neurol 2016;29:19–28 doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000341 pmid:27262148

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Töger J,
    2. Zahr MJ,
    3. Aristokleous N, et al

    . Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data. Magn Reson Med 2020 Apr 8. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/mrm.28269 pmid:32270549

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Bakhshinejad A,
    2. Baghaie A,
    3. Vali A, et al

    . Merging computational fluid dynamics and 4D-Flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and ridge regression. J Biomech 2017;58:162–73 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.004 pmid:2857790

    CrossRefPubMed