Rescan Time Delays in Ischemic Stroke Imaging: A Retrospective Observation and Analysis of Causes and Clinical Impact

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Demchuk AM,
   4. Menon BK, et al

   . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Campbell BC,
   3. Mitchell PJ,
   4. Kleinig TJ, et al

   . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Berkhemer OA,
   3. Fransen PSS,
   4. Beumer LA, et al

   . MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Jovin T,
   3. Chamorro A,
   4. Cobo E, et al

   . REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–2306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Nogueira RG,
   3. Jadhav AP,
   4. Haussen DC, et al

   . Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Albers GW,
   3. Marks MP,
   4. Kemp S, et al

   . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. van der Lugt A, et al

   . HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;316:1279–88 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13647 pmid:27673305

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Sheth SA,
   3. Jahan R,
   4. Gralla J, et al

   . for the SWIFT-STAR Trialists. Time to endovascular reperfusion and degree of disability in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2015;78:584–93 doi:10.1002/ana.24474 pmid:26153450

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Yeatts SD,
    4. Mazighi M, et al

    . IMS III Trialists. Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:567–74 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70066-3 pmid:24784550

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Mulder MJH,
    3. Jansen IG,
    4. Goldhoorn RB, et al

    . MR CLEAN Registry Investigators. Time to endovascular treatment and outcome in acute ischemic stroke: MR CLEAN registry results. Circulation 2018;138:232–40 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032600 pmid:29581124

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    American Heart Association. Target: Stroke Phase III. https://www.heart.org/en/professional/quality-improvement/target-stroke/introducing-target-stroke-phase-iii. Accessed January 5, 2021
13. 13.↵
    2. Powers WJ,
    3. Rabinstein AA,
    4. Ackerson T, et al

    . Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke—A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Jayaraman MV,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . Asian-Australian Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (AAFITN), Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), Canadian Society of Neuroradiology (CSNR), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Stroke Organization (ESO), Japanese Society for NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JSNET), The French Society of Neuroradiology (SFNR), Ibero-Latin American Society of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (SILAN), Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN), World Stroke Organization (WSO), World Federation of Interventional Neuroradiology (WFITN). Standards of practice in acute ischemic stroke intervention: international recommendations. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:1121–26 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014287 pmid:30154252

    FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Albers GW, et al

    . Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. Imaging recommendations for acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: a joint statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. J Am Coll Radiology 2013;10:828–32 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.06.019 pmid:23948676

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kwei KT,
    3. Liang J,
    4. Wilson N, et al

    . Stroke severity affects timing: time from stroke code activation to initial imaging is longer in patients with milder strokes. Neurologist 2018;23:79–82 doi:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000157 pmid:29722739

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Mowla A,
    3. Doyle J,
    4. Lail NS, et al

    . Delays in door-to-needle time for acute ischemic stroke in the emergency department: a comprehensive stroke center experience. J Neurol Sci 2017;376:102–05 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.003 pmid:28431590

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Prabhakaran S,
    3. Khorzad R,
    4. Brown A, et al

    . Academic-community hospital comparison of vulnerabilities in door-to-needle process for acute ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015;8:S148–54 doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002085 pmid:26515203

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Koge J,
    3. Matsumoto S,
    4. Nakahara I, et al

    . Improving treatment times for patients with in-hospital stroke using a standardized protocol. J Neurol Sci 2017;381:68–73 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2017.08.023 pmid:28991718

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. Levi CR, et al

    . Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:2648–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660548 pmid:22858726

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Eastwood JD,
    3. Lev MH,
    4. Wintermark M, et al

    . Correlation of early dynamic CT perfusion imaging with whole-brain MR diffusion and perfusion imaging in acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1869–75 pmid:14561618

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Saur D,
    3. Kucinski T,
    4. Grzyska U, et al

    . Sensitivity and interrater agreement of CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in hyperacute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:878–85 pmid:12748088

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Urbach H,
    3. Flacke S,
    4. Keller E, et al

    . Detectability and detection rate of acute cerebral hemisphere infarcts on CT and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroradiol 2000;42:722–27 doi:10.1007/s002340000401 pmid:11110072

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    United States Census Bureau. B19013 median household income in the past 12 months (in 2019 inflation-adjusted dollars). https://censusreporter.org/tables/B19013/. Accessed September 15, 2020
25. 25.↵
    2. Saposnik G,
    3. Cote R,
    4. Phillips S, et al

    . Stroke outcome in those over 80: a multicenter cohort study across Canada. Stroke 2008;39:2310–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511402 pmid:18556583

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Arora R,
    3. Salamon E,
    4. Katz JM, et al

    . Use and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients ≥90 years of age. Stroke 2016;47:2347–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012241 pmid:27491734

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    NIH policy on reporting race and ethnicity data: subjects in clinical research. Release Date. August 8, 2001. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-01-053.html. Accessed April 22, 2021
28. 28.↵
    2. Cruz-Flores S,
    3. Rabinstein A,
    4. Biller J, et al

    . Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience—a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:2091–116 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24 pmid:21617147

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Almekhlafi MA,
    4. Fan L, et al

    . Evaluation of interval times from onset to reperfusion in patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the IMS III Trial. Circulation 2014;130:265–72 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007826 pmid:24815501

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Weir L,
    4. Desmond PM, et al

    . CT perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:613–18 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303752 pmid:23355804

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Ribó M,
    3. Boned S,
    4. Rubiera M, et al

    . Direct transfer to angiosuite to reduce door-to-puncture time in thrombectomy for acute stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:221–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013038 pmid:28446535

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Mendez B,
    3. Requena M,
    4. Aires A, et al

    . Direct transfer to angio-suite to reduce workflow times and increase favorable clinical outcome. Stroke 2018;49:2723–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021989 pmid:30355182

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Brehm A,
    3. Tsogkas I,
    4. Maier IL, et al

    . One-stop management with perfusion for transfer patients with stroke due to a large-vessel occlusion: feasibility and effects on in-hospital times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1330–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6129 pmid:31296523

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Pfaff JA,
    3. Schönenberger S,
    4. Herweh C, et al

    . Direct transfer to angio-suite versus computed tomography-transit in patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized trial. Stroke 2020;51:2630–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029905 pmid:32772684

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Karve SJ,
    3. Balkrishnan R,
    4. Mohammad YM, et al

    . Racial/ethnic disparities in emergency department waiting time for stroke patients in the United States. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;20:30–40 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.10.006 pmid:20538484

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Belagaje SR,
    3. Sun CH,
    4. Nogueira RG, et al

    . Discharge disposition to skilled nursing facility after endovascular reperfusion therapy predicts a poor prognosis. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:99–103 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011045 pmid:24443413

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Bautista AE,
    3. Meyer DM,
    4. Meyer BC

    . Novel definition of stroke “good responders” predicts 90-day outcome after thrombolysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:104422 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104422 pmid:31624038

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Martinez G,
    3. Katz JM,
    4. Pandya A, et al

    . Cost-effectiveness study of initial imaging selection in acute ischemic stroke care. J Am Coll Radiol 2020 31362–64 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.013 pmid:33387454

    CrossRefPubMed