The Restless Spinal Cord in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kalsi-Ryan S,
   2. Karadimas SK,
   3. Fehlings MG

   . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013;19:409–21 doi:10.1177/1073858412467377 pmid:23204243

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Karadimas SK,
   2. Moon ES,
   3. Yu WR, et al

   . A novel experimental model of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to facilitate translational research. Neurobiol Dis 2013;54:43–58 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.02.013 pmid:23466695

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Karadimas SK,
   2. Gatzounis G,
   3. Fehlings MG

   . Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2015;24(Suppl 2):132–38 doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3264-4 pmid:24626958

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Karadimas SK,
   2. Klironomos G,
   3. Papachristou DJ, et al

   . Immuno-histochemical profile of NF-kappaB/p50: NF-kappaB/p65, MMP-9, MMP-2, and u-PA in experimental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:4–10 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318261ea6f pmid:22673181

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Beattie MS,
   2. Manley GT

   . Tight squeeze, slow burn: inflammation and the aetiology of cervical myelopathy. Brain 2011;134:1259–61 doi:10.1093/brain/awr088 pmid:21596766

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Hupp M,
   2. Vallotton K,
   3. Brockmann C, et al

   . Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool. Sci Rep 2019;9:7415 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43908-x pmid:31092891

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Mikulis DJ,
   2. Wood ML,
   3. Zerdoner OA, et al

   . Oscillatory motion of the normal cervical spinal cord. Radiology 1994;192:117–21 doi:10.1148/radiology.192.1.8208922 pmid:8208922

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Chang HS,
   2. Nejo T,
   3. Yoshida S, et al

   . Increased flow signal in compressed segments of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:2136–42 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000607 pmid:25271503

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Tanaka H,
   2. Sakurai K,
   3. Iwasaki M, et al

   . Craniocaudal motion velocity in the cervical spinal cord in degenerative disease as shown by MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1997;38:803–09 doi:10.1080/02841859709172414 pmid:9332234

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Vavasour IM,
    2. Meyers SM,
    3. MacMillan EL, et al

    . Increased spinal cord movements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 2014;14:2344–54 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.036 pmid:24462810

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Wolf K,
    2. Hupp M,
    3. Friedl S, et al

    . In cervical spondylotic myelopathy spinal cord motion is focally increased at the level of stenosis: a controlled cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord 2018;56:769–76 doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0075-1 pmid:29497178

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Harris PA,
    2. Taylor R,
    3. Thielke R, et al

    . Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81 doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 pmid:18929686

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Tanaka H,
    2. Sakurai K,
    3. Kashiwagi N, et al

    . Transition of the craniocaudal velocity of the spinal cord: from cervical segment to lumbar enlargement. Invest Radiol 1998;33:141–45 doi:10.1097/00004424-199803000-00003 pmid:9525752

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Gatehouse PD,
    2. Rolf MP,
    3. Bloch KM, et al

    . A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:72 doi:10.1186/1532-429X-14-72 pmid:23083397

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Levy LM,
    2. Di Chiro G,
    3. McCullough DC, et al

    . Fixed spinal cord: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169:773–78 doi:10.1148/radiology.169.3.3186999 pmid:3186999

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. David G,
    2. Mohammadi S,
    3. Martin AR, et al

    . Traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury: pathological insights from neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurol 2019;15:718–31 doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0270-5 pmid:31673093

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Grabher P,
    2. Mohammadi S,
    3. Trachsler A, et al

    . Voxel-based analysis of grey and white matter degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Sci Rep 2016;6:24636 doi:10.1038/srep24636 pmid:27095134

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Grabher P,
    2. Mohammadi S,
    3. David G, et al

    . Neurodegeneration in the spinal ventral horn prior to motor impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurotrauma 2017;34:2329–34 doi:10.1089/neu.2017.4980 pmid:28462691

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Nouri A,
    2. Tetreault L,
    3. Singh A, et al

    . Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E675–93 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913 pmid:25839387

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Tunturi AR

    . Elasticity of the spinal cord, pia, and denticulate ligament in the dog. J Neurosurg 1978;48:975–79 doi:10.3171/jns.1978.48.6.0975 pmid:660249

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Tubbs RS,
    2. Salter G,
    3. Grabb PA, et al

    . The denticulate ligament: anatomy and functional significance. J Neurosurg 2001;94:271–75 doi:10.3171/spi.2001.94.2.0271 pmid:11302630

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Ceylan D,
    2. Tatarli N,
    3. Abdullaev T, et al

    . The denticulate ligament: anatomical properties, functional and clinical significance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1229–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1361-x pmid:22555553

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Jokich PM,
    2. Rubin JM,
    3. Dohrmann GJ

    . Intraoperative ultrasonic evaluation of spinal cord motion. J Neurosurg 1984;60:707–11 doi:10.3171/jns.1984.60.4.0707 pmid:6707739

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Baron EM,
    2. Young FW

    . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology: clinical course, and diagnosis. J Neurosurg 2007;60(1 Supp1 1):S35–41 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000215383.64386.82 pmid:17204884

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Schaller B,
    2. Graf R

    . Different compartments of intracranial pressure and its relationship to cerebral blood flow. J Trauma 2005;59:1521–31 doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000197402.20180.6b pmid:16394936

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Greitz DW,
    2. Franck A,
    3. Nordell B, et al

    . Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrondynamics studies by magnetic resonance phase imaging: the Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 1992;34:370–80 doi:10.1007/BF00596493 pmid:1407513

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Schroth G,
    2. Klose U

    . Cerebrospinal fluid flow, I: physiology of cardiac-related pulsation. Neuroradiology 1992;35:1–9 doi:10.1007/BF00588270 pmid:1289731

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Winklhofer S,
    2. Schoth F,
    3. Stolzmann P, et al

    . Spinal cord motion: influence of respiration and cardiac cycle. Rofo 2014;186:1016–21 doi:10.1055/s-0034-1366429 pmid:24756427

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Tseng CL,
    2. Sussman MS,
    3. Atenafu EG, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of spinal cord and cauda equina motion in supine patients with spinal metastases planned for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;91:995–1002 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.037 pmid:25832691

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Cai J,
    2. Sheng K,
    3. Sheehan JP, et al

    . Evaluation of thoracic spinal cord motion using dynamic MRI. Radiother Oncol 2007;84:279–82 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.008 pmid:17692979

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Yildiz S,
    2. Thyagaraj S,
    3. Jin N, et al

    . Quantifying the influence of respiration and cardiac pulsations on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics using real-time phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;46:431–39 doi:10.1002/jmri.25591 pmid:28152239

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Bunck AC,
    2. Kroger JR,
    3. Juttner A, et al

    . Magnetic resonance 4D flow characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid at the craniocervical junction and the cervical spinal canal. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1788–96 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2105-7 pmid:21404133

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Mardal KA,
    2. Rutkowska G,
    3. Linge S, et al

    . Estimation of CSF flow resistance in the upper cervical spine. Neuroradiol J 2013;26:106–10 doi:10.1177/197140091302600118 pmid:23859177

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Douglas JF

    . Fluid Mechanics. Harlow, England ; New York: Prentice Hall; 2011
35. 35.↵
    1. Kording F,
    2. Yamamura J,
    3. Lund G, et al

    . Doppler ultrasound triggering for cardiovascular MRI at 3T in a healthy volunteer study. Magn Reson Med Sci 2017;16:98–108 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0104 pmid:27001390

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Matsuzaki H,
    2. Wakabayashi K,
    3. Ishihara K, et al

    . The origin and significance of spinal cord pulsation. Spinal Cord 1996;34:422–26 doi:10.1038/sc.1996.75 pmid:8963998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Armonda RA,
    2. Citrin CM,
    3. Foley KT, et al

    . Quantitative cine-mode magnetic resonance imaging of Chiari I malformations: an analysis of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Neurosurgery 1994;35:214–23; discussion 223–34 doi:10.1227/00006123-199408000-00006 pmid:7969828

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Levy LM,
    2. Di Chiro G

    . MR phase imaging and cerebrospinal fluid flow in the head and spine. Neuroradiology 1990;32:399–406 doi:10.1007/BF00588473 pmid:2259434

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Franze K,
    2. Janmey PA,
    3. Guck J

    . Mechanics in neuronal development and repair. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2013;15:227–51 doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150045 pmid:23642242

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Goriely A,
    2. Geers MG,
    3. Holzapfel GA, et al

    . Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2015;14:931–65 doi:10.1007/s10237-015-0662-4 pmid:25716305

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Lee L

    . Riding the wave of ependymal cilia: genetic susceptibility to hydrocephalus in primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Neurosci Res 2013;91:1117–32 doi:10.1002/jnr.23238 pmid:23686703

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. McCullough DC,
    2. Levy LM,
    3. DiChiro G, et al

    . Toward the prediction of neurological injury from tethered spinal cord: investigation of cord motion with magnetic resonance. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990;16:3–7; discussion 7 doi:10.1159/000120494 pmid:2133407

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Johnson DL,
    2. Levy LM

    . Predicting outcome in the tethered cord syndrome: a study of cord motion. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;22:115–19 doi:10.1159/000120888 pmid:7786803

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Wolpert SM,
    2. Bhadelia RA,
    3. Bogdan AR, et al

    . Chiari I malformations: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1299–1308 pmid:7976942

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    1. Terae S,
    2. Miyasaka K,
    3. Abe S, et al

    . Increased pulsatile movement of the hindbrain in syringomyelia associated with the Chiari malformation: cine-MRI with presaturation bolus tracking. Neuroradiology 1994;36:125–29 doi:10.1007/BF00588077 pmid:8183451

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Pujol J,
    2. Roig C,
    3. Capdevila A, et al

    . Motion of the cerebellar tonsils in Chiari type I malformation studied by cine phase-contrast MRI. Neurology 1995;45:1746–53 doi:10.1212/wnl.45.9.1746 pmid:7675239

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Hofmann E,
    2. Warmuth-Metz M,
    3. Bendszus M, et al

    . Phase-contrast MR imaging of the cervical CSF and spinal cord: volumetric motion analysis in patients with Chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:151–58 pmid:10669242

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Badhiwala JH,
    2. Ahuja CS,
    3. Akbar MA, et al

    . Degenerative cervical myelopathy: update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol 2020;16:108–24 doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0303-0 pmid:31974455

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . A novel MRI biomarker of spinal cord white matter injury: T2*-weighted white matter to gray matter signal intensity ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1266–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5162 pmid:28428212

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . Clinically feasible microstructural MRI to quantify cervical spinal cord tissue injury using DTI, MT, and T2*-weighted imaging: assessment of normative data and reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1257–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5163 pmid:8428213

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. 51.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . Can microstructural MRI detect subclinical tissue injury in subjects with asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression? A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019809 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019809 pmid:9654015

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Cohen-Adad J, et al

    . Monitoring for myelopathic progression with multiparametric quantitative MRI. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195733 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195733 pmid:29664964

    CrossRefPubMed