Are Dynamic Arterial Spin-Labeling MRA and Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA Suited for Confirmation of Obliteration following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. da Costa L,
   2. Wallace MC,
   3. Ter Brugge KG, et al

   . The natural history and predictive features of hemorrhage from brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 2009;40:100–05 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524678 pmid:19008469

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. van Beijnum J,
   2. van der Worp HB,
   3. Buis DR, et al

   . Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review. JAMA 2011;306:2011–19 doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1632 pmid:22068993

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Koltz MT,
   2. Polifka AJ,
   3. Saltos A, et al

   . Long-term outcome of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations graded by the Spetzler-Martin classification. J Neurosurg Sci 2013;118:74–83 doi:10.3171/2012.9.JNS112329 pmid:29582979

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Lee CC,
   2. Reardon MA,
   3. Ball BZ, et al

   . The predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating intracranial arteriovenous malformation obliteration after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2015;123:136–44 doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS141565 pmid:25839923

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Soize S,
   2. Bouquigny F,
   3. Kadziolka K, et al

   . Value of 4D MR angiography at 3T compared with DSA for the follow-up of treated brain arteriovenous malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1903–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3982 pmid:24904052

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Starke RM,
   2. Kano H,
   3. Ding D, et al

   . Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg Sci 2017;126:36–44 doi:10.3171/2015.9.JNS151311 pmid:26943847

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Kaufmann TJ,
   2. Huston J 3rd.,
   3. Mandrekar JN, et al

   . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19 doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060536 pmid:17517935

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fifi JT,
   2. Meyers PM,
   3. Lavine SD, et al

   . Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:442–47 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012 pmid:19246211

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Buis DR,
   2. Bot JC,
   3. Barkhof F, et al

   . The predictive value of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:232–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2744 pmid:22095967

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Lim HK,
    2. Choi CG,
    3. Kim SM, et al

    . Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced four-dimensional MR angiography at 3.0 T. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1064–69 doi:10.1259/bjr/30618275 pmid:22294705

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Johnson K, et al

    . Fast contrast-enhanced 4D MRA and 4D flow MRI using constrained reconstruction (HYPRFlow): potential applications for brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1049–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4245 pmid:25698624

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Hadizadeh DR,
    2. Gieseke J,
    3. Beck G, et al

    . View-sharing in keyhole imaging: Partially compressed central k-space acquisition in time-resolved MRA at 3.0 T. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:400–06 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.020 pmid:20447790

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Wu H,
    2. Block WF,
    3. Turski PA, et al

    . Noncontrast dynamic 3D intracranial MR angiography using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) and accelerated 3D radial acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1320–26 doi:10.1002/jmri.24279 pmid:24129947

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lindner T,
    2. Jensen-Kondering U,
    3. van Osch MJ, et al

    . 3D time-resolved vessel-selective angiography based on pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling. Magn Reson Imaging 2015;33:840–06 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.03.001 pmid:25777269

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Suzuki Y,
    2. Teeuwisse M,
    3. Schmid S

    . Improving 4D pCASL angiography by combining Hadamard time-encoding with Look-Locker readout. In: Proceedings of the 22th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Milan, Italy, 2014
16. 16.↵
    1. Nakamura M,
    2. Yoneyama M,
    3. Tabuchi T, et al

    . Non-contrast time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography combining high resolution multiple phase echo planar imaging based signal targeting and alternating radiofrequency contrast inherent inflow enhanced multi phase angiography combining spatial resolution echo planar imaging based signal targeting and alternating radiofrequency in intracranial arteries [in Japanese]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2012;68:1525–32 doi:10.6009/jjrt.2012_jsrt_68.11.1525 pmid:23171775

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Suzuki Y,
    2. Fujima N,
    3. Ogino T, et al

    . Acceleration of ASL-based time-resolved MR angiography by acquisition of control and labeled images in the same shot (ACTRESS). Magn Reson Med 2018;79:224–33 doi:10.1002/mrm.26667] pmid:28321915

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Machet A,
    2. Portefaix C,
    3. Kadziolka K, et al

    . Brain arteriovenous malformation diagnosis: value of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T compared to DSA. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1099–108 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1024-x pmid:22407410

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Khandanpour N,
    2. Griffiths P,
    3. Warren D, et al

    . Prospective comparison of late 3T MRI with conventional angiography in evaluating the patency of cerebral arteriovenous malformations treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: comparative study controlled clinical trial. Neuroradiology 2013;55:683–87 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1153-x pmid:23440432

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Iryo Y,
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Nakamura M, et al

    . Evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with four-dimensional arterial-spin labeling-based 3-T magnetic resonance angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:290–96 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000346 pmid:26599964

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Fujima N,
    2. Osanai T,
    3. Shimizu Y, et al

    . Utility of noncontrast-enhanced time-resolved four-dimensional MR angiography with a vessel-selective technique for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:834–45 doi:10.1002/jmri.25222 pmid:26970348

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Yu S,
    2. Yan L,
    3. Yao Y, et al

    . Noncontrast dynamic MRA in intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM), comparison with time of flight (TOF) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA): Comparative Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:869–77 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.027 pmid:22521994

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Petersen ET,
    2. Zimine I,
    3. Ho Y-CL, et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. other. R J Radiol 2006;79:688–701 doi:10.1259/bjr/67705974 pmid:16861326

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kukuk GM,
    2. Hadizadeh DR,
    3. Bostrom A, et al

    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformations at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study of 4D-MRA in combination with selective arterial spin labeling and digital subtraction angiography: comparative study. Invest Radiol 2010;45:126–32 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c7bcfe pmid:20065859

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Jang J,
    2. Schmitt P,
    3. Kim BY, et al

    . Non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography with STAR spin labeling and variable flip angle sampling: a feasibility study for the assessment of dural arteriovenous fistula. Neuroradiology 2014;56:305–14 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1336-0 pmid:24526141

    CrossRefPubMed