Ganglionic Eminence Anomalies and Coexisting Cerebral Developmental Anomalies on Fetal MR Imaging: Multicenter-Based Review of 60 Cases

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Stiles J,
   3. Jernigan TL

   . The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol Rev 2010;20:327–48 doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9148-4 pmid:21042938

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Anderson SA,
   3. Eisenstat DD,
   4. Shi L, et al

   . lnterneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 1997;278:474–76 doi:10.1126/science.278.5337.474 pmid:9334308

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Le TN,
   3. Zhou Q,
   4. Cobos I, et al

   . GABAergic interneuron differentiation in the basal forebrain is mediated through direct regulation of glutamic acid decarboxylase isoforms by Dlx homeobox transcription factors. J Neurosci 2017;37:8816–29 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2125-16.2017 pmid:28821666

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Arber C,
   3. Li M

   . Cortical interneurons from human pluripotent stem cells: prospects for neurological and psychiatric disease. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;13:7–10 doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00010] pmid:23493959

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lavdas AA,
   3. Grigoriou M,
   4. Pachnis V, et al

   . The medial ganglionic eminence gives rise to a population of early neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 1999;19:7881–88 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-07881.1999 pmid:10479690

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Miyoshi G,
   3. Hjerling-Leffler J,
   4. Karayannis T, et al

   . Genetic fate mapping reveals that the caudal ganglionic eminence produces a large and diverse population of superficial cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 2010;30:1582–94 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4515-09.2010 pmid:20130169

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Shinozaki K,
   3. Miyagi T,
   4. Yoshida M, et al

   . Absence of Cajal-Retzius cells and subplate neurons associated with defects of tangential cell migration from ganglionic eminence in Emx1/2 double mutant cerebral cortex. Development 2002;129:3479–92 pmid:12091317

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Miyoshi G

   . Elucidating the developmental trajectories of GABAergic cortical interneuron subtypes. Neurosci Res 2019;138:26–32 doi:10.1016/j.neures.2018.09.012 pmid:30227162

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Vasung L,
   3. Charvet CJ,
   4. Shiohama T, et al

   . Ex vivo fetal brain MRI: recent advances, challenges, and future directions. Neuroimage 2019;195:23–37 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.034 pmid:30905833

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Righini A,
    3. Frassoni C,
    4. Inverardi F, et al

    . Bilateral cavitations of ganglionic eminence: a fetal MR imaging sign of halted brain development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1841–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3508 pmid:23598830

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Righini A,
    3. Cesaretti C,
    4. Conte G, et al

    . Expanding the spectrum of human ganglionic eminence region anomalies on fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiol 2016;58:293–300 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1622-5 pmid:26608601

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Righini A,
    3. Genovese M,
    4. Parazzini C, et al

    . Cortical formation abnormalities on foetal MR imaging: a proposed classification system trialled on 356 cases from Italian and UK centres. Eur Radiol 2020;30:5250–60 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06899-2 pmid:32405748

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Tilea B,
    3. Alberti C,
    4. Adamsbaum C, et al

    . Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:173–81 doi:10.1002/uog.6276 pmid:19172662

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Prefumo F,
    3. Petrilli G,
    4. Palumbo G, et al

    . Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of cavitation of ganglionic eminence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:558–60 doi:10.1002/uog.20236 pmid:30740797

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Guibaud L,
    3. Selleret L,
    4. Larroche JC, et al

    . Abnormal Sylvian fissure on prenatal cerebral imaging: significance and correlation with neuropathological and postnatal data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:50–60 doi:10.1002/uog.5357 pmid:18570201

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Fallet-Bianco C,
    3. Loeuillet L,
    4. Poirier K, et al

    . Neuropathological phenotype of a distinct form of lissencephaly associated with mutations in TUBA1A. Brain 2008;131:2304–20 doi:10.1093/brain/awn155 pmid:18669490

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Fallet-Bianco C,
    3. Laquerrière A,
    4. Poirier K, et al

    . Mutations in tubulin genes are frequent causes of various foetal malformations of cortical development including microlissencephaly. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:69–91 doi:10.1186/2051-5960-2-69 pmid:25059107

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Colombo E,
    3. Collombat P,
    4. Colasante G, et al

    . Inactivation of Arx, the murine ortholog of the X-linked lissencephaly with ambiguous genitalia gene, leads to severe disorganization of the ventral telencephalon with impaired neuronal migration and differentiation. J Neurosci 2007;27:4786–98 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0417-07.2007 pmid:17460091

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Ffrench-Constant S,
    3. Kachramanoglou C,
    4. Jones B, et al

    . Fetal and neonatal MRI features of ARX-related lissencephaly presenting with neonatal refractory seizure disorder. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019;9:1767–72 doi:10.21037/qims.2019.10.14 pmid:31867230

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Amir T,
    3. Poretti A,
    4. Boltshauser E, et al

    . Differential diagnosis of ventriculomegaly and brainstem kinking on fetal MRI. Brain Dev 2016;38:103–08 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2015.05.006 pmid:26013959

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Williams F,
    3. Griffiths PD

    . The diagnosis of hemimegalencephaly using in utero MRI. Clin Radiol 2014;69:291–97 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.026 pmid:24631281

    CrossRefPubMed