Quantitative Diffusion and Spectroscopic Neuroimaging Combined with a Novel Early-Developmental Assessment Improves Models for 1-Year Developmental Outcomes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lean RE,
   2. Han RH,
   3. Smyser TA, et al

   . Altered neonatal white and gray matter microstructure is associated with neurodevelopmental impairments in very preterm infants with high-grade brain injury. Pediatr Res 2019;86:365–74 doi:10.1038/s41390-019-0461-1 pmid:31212303

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Back SA,
   2. Miller SP

   . Brain injury in premature neonates: a primary cerebral dysmaturation disorder? Ann Neurol 2014;75:469–86 doi:10.1002/ana.24132 pmid:24615937

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Duerden EG,
   2. Foong J,
   3. Chau V, et al

   . Tract-based spatial statistics in preterm-born neonates predicts cognitive and motor outcomes at 18 months. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1565–71 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4312 pmid:25929880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Coker-Bolt P,
   2. Barbour A,
   3. Moss H, et al

   . Correlating early motor skills to white matter abnormalities in preterm infants using diffusion tensor imaging. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2016;9:185–93 doi:10.3233/PRM-160380 pmid:27612078

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Coker-Bolt P,
   2. Woodbury ML,
   3. Perkel J, et al

   . Identifying premature infants at high and low risk for motor delays using motor performance testing and MRS. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2014;7:219–32 doi:10.3233/PRM-140291 pmid:25260505

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Gower L,
   2. Jenkins D,
   3. Fraser JL, et al

   . Early developmental assessment with a short screening test, the STEP, predicts one-year outcomes. J Perinatol 2019;39:184–92 doi:10.1038/s41372-018-0234-4 pmid:30301940

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Novak I,
   2. Morgan C,
   3. Adde L, et al

   . Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:897–907 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689 pmid:28715518

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Chau V,
   2. Synnes A,
   3. Grunau RE, et al

   . Abnormal brain maturation in preterm neonates associated with adverse developmental outcomes. Neurology 2013;81:2082–89 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000437298.43688.b9 pmid:24212394

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kreis R,
   2. Hofmann L,
   3. Kuhlmann B, et al

   . Brain metabolite composition during early human brain development as measured by quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:949–58 doi:10.1002/mrm.10304 pmid:12465103

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Tanifuji S,
    2. Akasaka M,
    3. Kamei A, et al

    . Temporal brain metabolite changes in preterm infants with normal development. Brain Dev 2017;39:196–202 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2016.10.006 pmid:27838187

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kendall GS,
    2. Melbourne A,
    3. Johnson S, et al

    . White matter NAA/Cho and Cho/Cr ratios at MR spectroscopy are predictive of motor outcome in preterm infants. Radiology 2014;271:230–38 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122679 pmid:24475798

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Lally PJ,
    2. Montaldo P,
    3. Oliveira V, et al

    . MARBLE consortium magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of brain injury after moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:35–45 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30325-9 pmid:30447969

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Helpern JA

    . MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010;23:698–710 doi:10.1002/nbm.1518 pmid:20632416

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Basser PJ,
    2. Mattiello J,
    3. LeBihan D

    . MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259–67 doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 pmid:8130344

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Helpern JA,
    3. Ramani A, et al

    . Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.20508 pmid:15906300

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Steven AJ,
    2. Zhuo J,
    3. Melhem ER

    . Diffusion kurtosis imaging: an emerging technique for evaluating the microstructural environment of the brain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:W26–33 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11365 pmid:24370162

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Galdi P,
    2. Blesa M,
    3. Stoye DQ, et al

    . Neonatal morphometric similarity mapping for predicting brain age and characterizing neuroanatomic variation associated with preterm birth. Neuroimage Clin 2020;25:102195 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102195 pmid:32044713

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Gao J,
    2. Li X,
    3. Li Y, et al

    . Differentiating T2 hyperintensity in neonatal white matter by two-compartment model of diffusional kurtosis imaging. Sci Rep 2016;6:24473 doi:10.1038/srep24473 pmid:27075248

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Paydar A,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Nwankwo JI, et al

    . Diffusional kurtosis imaging of the developing brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:808–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3764 pmid:24231848

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Shi J,
    2. Chang L,
    3. Wang J, et al

    . Initial application of diffusional kurtosis imaging in evaluating brain development of healthy preterm infants. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154146 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154146 pmid:27101246

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Shi J,
    2. Yang S,
    3. Wang J, et al

    . Detecting normal pediatric brain development with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Eur J Radiol 2019;120:108690 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108690 pmid:31605964

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Duncan AF,
    2. Bann C,
    3. Boatman C, et al

    . NICHD Neonatal Research Network: do currently recommended Bayley-III cutoffs overestimate motor impairment in infants born <27 weeks gestation? J Perinatol 2015;35:516–21 doi:10.1038/jp.2014.243 pmid:25634519

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Vohr BR,
    2. Stephens BE,
    3. Higgins RD, et al

    . NICHD Neonatal Research Network: are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. J Pediatr 2012;161:222–28 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.057 pmid:22421261

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Bentzley JP,
    2. Coker-Bolt P,
    3. Moreau NG, et al

    . Kinematic measurement of 12-week head control correlates with 12-month neurodevelopment in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2015;91:159–64 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.01.001

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Provencher SW

    . Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed 2001;14:260–64 doi:10.1002/nbm.698 pmid:11410943

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Moss HG,
    2. Jenkins DD,
    3. Yazdani M, et al

    . Identifying the translational complexity of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in neonates and infants. NMR Biomed 2019;32:e4089 doi:10.1002/nbm.4089 pmid:30924565

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Soher BJ,
    2. Todd PS,
    3. Steinburg J, et al

    . VeSPA: integrated applications for RF pulse design, spectral simulation and MRS data analysis. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; May 7–13, 2011
28. 28.↵
    1. Ades-Aron B,
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Kochunov P, et al

    . Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline. Neuroimage 2018;183:532–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.066 pmid:30077743

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Veraart J,
    2. Novikov DS,
    3. Christiaens D, et al

    . Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 2016;142:394–406 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016 pmid:27523449

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Kellner E,
    2. Dhital B,
    3. Kiselev VG, et al

    . Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1574–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.26054 pmid:26745823

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Andersson JL,
    2. Graham MS,
    3. Zsoldos E, et al

    . Incorporating outlier detection and replacement into a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images. Neuroimage 2016;141:556–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.058 pmid:27393418

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Andersson JL,
    2. Sotiropoulos SN

    . An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 2016;125:1063–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019 pmid:26481672

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Tabesh A,
    2. Jensen JH,
    3. Ardekani BA, et al

    . Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:823–36 doi:10.1002/mrm.22655 pmid:21337412

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Gudbjartsson H,
    2. Patz S

    . The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:910–14 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340618 pmid:8598820

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Veraart J,
    2. Sijbers J,
    3. Sunaert S, et al

    . Weighted linear least squares estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: strengths, limitations, and pitfalls. Neuroimage 2013;81:335–46 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.028 pmid:23684865

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Glenn GR,
    2. Helpern JA,
    3. Tabesh A, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of diffusional kurtosis anisotropy. NMR Biomed 2015;28:448–59 doi:10.1002/nbm.3271 pmid:25728763

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Hansen B,
    2. Jespersen SN

    . Kurtosis fractional anisotropy, its contrast and estimation by proxy. Sci Rep 2016;6:23999 doi:10.1038/srep23999 pmid:27041679

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Hansen B

    . An introduction to kurtosis fractional anisotropy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1638–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6235 pmid:31558496

    FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Hui ES,
    2. Glenn RG,
    3. Helpern JA, et al

    . Kurtosis analysis of neural diffusion organization. Neuroimage 2015;106:391–403 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.015 pmid:25463453

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Akaike H

    . Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econometrics 1981;16:3–14 doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90071-3

    CrossRefWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Burnham KP,
    2. Anderson DR

    . Multimodel inference. Sociological Methods & Research 2004;33:261–304 doi:10.1177/0049124104268644

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Urenjak J,
    2. Williams SR,
    3. Gadian DG, et al

    . Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy unambiguously identifies different neural cell types. J Neurosci 1993;13:981–89 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-00981.1993 pmid:8441018

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Schuff N,
    2. Meyerhoff DJ,
    3. Mueller S, et al

    . NAA as a marker of neuronal injury in neurodegenerative disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 2006;576:241–62 doi:10.1007/0-387-30172-0_17 pmid:16802717

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Moffett JR,
    2. Arun P,
    3. Ariyannur PS, et al

    . NAA reductions in brain injury: impact on post-injury neuroenergetics, lipid synthesis, and protein acetylation. Front Neuroenergetics 2013;5:11 doi:10.3389/fnene.2013.00011 pmid:24421768

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Gadin E,
    2. Lobo M,
    3. Paul DA, et al

    . Volumetric MRI and MRS and early motor development of infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther 2012;24:38–44 doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31823e069d pmid:22207464

    CrossRefPubMed