Refining the Neuroimaging Definition of the Dandy-Walker Phenotype

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Barkovich AJ,
   2. Raybaud CA

   1. Barkovich AJ,
   2. Raybaud CA

   . Congenital malformations of the brain and skull. In: Barkovich AJ, Raybaud CA, eds. Pediatric Neuroimaging. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019:531
2. 2.↵
   1. Wüest A,
   2. Surbek D,
   3. Wiest R, et al

   . Enlarged posterior fossa on prenatal imaging: differential diagnosis, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96:837–43 doi:10.1111/aogs.13131 pmid:28295149

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.
   1. Lerman-Sagie T,
   2. Prayer D,
   3. Stöcklein S, et al

   . Fetal cerebellar disorders. Handb Clin Neurol 2018;155:3–23 doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00001-9 pmid:29891067

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Nagaraj UD,
   2. Kline-Faith BM,
   3. Horn PS, et al

   . Evaluation of posterior fossa biometric measurements on fetal MRI in the evaluation of Dandy-Walker continuum. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1716–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7215 pmid:34266871

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Aldinger KA,
   2. Timms AE,
   3. Thomson Z, et al

   . Redefining the etiologic landscape of cerebellar malformations. Am J Hum Genet 2019;105:606–15 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.019 pmid:31474318

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Whitehead MT,
   2. Vezina G,
   3. Schlatterer SD, et al

   . Taenia-tela choroidea complex and choroid plexus location help distinguish Dandy-Walker malformation and Blake pouch cysts. Pediatr Radiol 2021;51:1457–70 doi:10.1007/s00247-021-04991-3 pmid:33783580

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Bernardo S,
   2. Vinci V,
   3. Saldari M, et al

   . Dandy-Walker malformation: is the “tail sign” the key sign? Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1358–64 doi:10.1002/pd.4705 pmid:26448595

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Paladini D,
   2. Donarini G,
   3. Parodi S, et al

   . Hindbrain morphometry and choroid plexus position in differential diagnosis of posterior fossa cystic malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:207–14 doi:10.1002/uog.20120 pmid:30207001

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Nelson MD,
   2. Maher K,
   3. Gilles FH

   . A different approach to cysts of the posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:720–32 doi:10.1007/s00247-004-1253-1 pmid:15316692

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Haldipur P,
    2. Aldinger KA,
    3. Bernardo S, et al

    . Spaciotemporal expansion of the primary progenitor zones in the developing human cerebellum. Science 2019;366:454–60 doi:10.1126/science.aax7526 pmid:31624095

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Haldipur P,
    2. Bernardo S,
    3. Aldinger K, et al

    . Evidence of disrupted rhombic lip development in the pathology of Dandy-Walker malformation. Acta Neuropathol 2021;142:761–76 doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02355-7 pmid:34347142

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Twickler DM,
    2. Reichel T,
    3. McIntire DD, et al

    . Fetal central nervous system ventricle and cisterna magna measurements by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:927–31 doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127146 pmid:12388979

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Chapman T,
    2. Menashe SJ,
    3. Zare M, et al

    . Establishment of normative values for the fetal posterior fossa by magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:1035–41 doi:10.1002/pd.5367 pmid:30280395

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Jandeaux C,
    2. Kuchcinski G,
    3. Ternynck C, et al

    . Biometry of the cerebellar vermis and brain stem in children: MR imaging reference data from measurements in 718 children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1835–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6257 pmid:31624120

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Dovjak GO,
    2. Brugger PC,
    3. Gruber GM, et al

    . Prenatal assessment of cerebellar vermian lobulation: fetal MRI with 3-Tesla postmortem validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:623–30 doi:10.1002/uog.18826 pmid:28782259

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.
    1. Kline-Faith B,
    2. Bulas D,
    3. Bahado-Singh R

    . Fundamental and Advanced Fetal Imaging: Ultrasound and MRI. Wolters Kluwers; 2015
17. 17.↵
    1. Pertl B,
    2. Eder S,
    3. Stern C, et al

    . The fetal posterior fossa on prenatal ultrasound imaging: normal longitudinal development and posterior fossa anomalies. Ultraschall Med 2019;40:692–721 doi:10.1055/a-1015-0157 pmid:31794996

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Whitehead MT,
    2. Vezina G

    . The fetal falx cerebelli. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50:984–89 doi:10.1007/s00247-020-04641-0 pmid:32185447

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Watson C,
    2. Bartholomaeus C,
    3. Puelles L

    . Time for radical changes in brain stem nomenclature-applying the lessons from developmental gene patterns. Front Neuroanat 2019;13:10 doi:10.3389/fnana.2019.00010 pmid:30809133

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Leto K,
    2. Arancillo M,
    3. Becker EB, et al

    . Consensus paper: cerebellar development. Cerebellum 2016;15:789–828 doi:10.1007/s12311-015-0724-2 pmid:26439486

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Robinson AJ,
    2. Blaser S,
    3. Toi A, et al

    . The fetal cerebellar vermis: assessment for abnormal development by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Q 2007;23:211–23 doi:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31814b162c pmid:17805192

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Malinger G,
    2. Lev D,
    3. Lerman-Sagie T

    . The fetal cerebellum: pitfalls in diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:372–80 doi:10.1002/pd.2196 pmid:19194867

    CrossRefPubMed