Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Resolution 3D T2-SPACE in Detecting Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bonneville F

   . Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014;95:1145–50 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2014.10.006

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Bousser MG,
   3. Ferro JM

   . Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update. Lancet Neurol 2007:6:162–70 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70029-7 pmid:17239803

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Al-Mufti F,
   3. Amuluru K,
   4. Sahni R, et al

   . Cerebral venous thrombosis in COVID-19: a New York Metropolitan Cohort Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1196–1200 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7134 pmid:33888450

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Sánchez van Kammen M,
   3. Aguiar de Sousa D,
   4. Poli S, et al

   ; Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Study Group. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine–induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1314 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3619 pmid:34581763

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Linn J,
   3. Brückmann H

   . Cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis: state-of-the-art imaging. Clin Neuroradiol 2010;20:25–37 doi:10.1007/s00062-010-9035-7 pmid:20229204

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Patel D,
   3. Machnowska M,
   4. Symons S, et al

   . Diagnostic performance of routine brain MRI sequences for dural venous sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2026–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4843 pmid:27313130

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Dmytriw AA,
   3. Song JS,
   4. Yu E, et al

   . Cerebral venous thrombosis: state of the art diagnosis and management. Neuroradiology 2018;60:669–85 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2032-2 pmid:29752489

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Leach JL,
   3. Fortuna RB,
   4. Jones BV, et al

   . Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 2006;26(Suppl 1):S19–41 doi:10.1148/rg.26si055174 pmid:17050515

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Sari S,
   3. Verim S,
   4. Hamcan S, et al

   . MRI diagnosis of dural sinus-cortical venous thrombosis: immediate post-contrast 3D GRE T1-weighted imaging versus unenhanced MR venography and conventional MR sequences. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;134:44–54 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.013 pmid:25938564

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Ray JG,
    3. Vermeulen MJ,
    4. Bharatha A, et al

    . Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes. JAMA 2016;316:952–61 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12126 pmid:27599330

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Thomsen H,
    3. Morcos SK

    ; European Society of Urogenital Radiology. USUR guidelines on contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 2006;31:131–40 doi:10.1007/s00261-005-0380-y pmid:16447092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Ishii K,
    4. Kawaguchi H, et al

    . High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 2014;270:834–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.13131669 pmid:24475844

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hinman JM,
    3. Provenzale JM

    . Hypointense thrombus on T2-weighted MR imaging: a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 2002;41:147–52 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00365-5 pmid:11809544

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bianchi D,
    3. Maeder P,
    4. Bogousslavsky J, et al

    . Diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis with routine magnetic resonance: an update. Eur Neurol 1998;40:179–90 doi:10.1159/000007978 pmid:9813400

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Vogl TJ,
    3. Bergman C,
    4. Villringer A, et al

    . Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1191–98 doi:10.2214/ajr.162.5.8166009 pmid:8166009

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Isensee C,
    3. Reul J,
    4. Thron A

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of thrombosed dural sinuses. Stroke 1994;25:29–34 doi:10.1161/01.str.25.1.29 pmid:8266378

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Dormont D,
    3. Anxionnat R,
    4. Evrard S, et al

    . MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis [in French]. J Neuroradiol 1994:21;81–99 pmid:8014661

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Mugler JP 3rd

    . Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:745–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.24542 pmid:24399498

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Mugler JP,
    3. Bao S,
    4. Mulkern RV, et al

    . Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;216:891–99 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au46891 pmid:10966728

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Mugler JP,
    3. Wald LL,
    4. Brookeman JR

    . T2-weighted 3D spin-echo train imaging of the brain at 3 Tesla: reduced power deposition using low flip-angle refocusing RF pulses. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland. April 21–27, 2001
21. 21.↵
    2. Saindane AM,
    3. Mitchell BC,
    4. Kang J, et al

    . Performance of spin-echo and gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences for evaluation of dural venous sinus thrombosis and stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:162–69 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9095 pmid:23789671

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Hacein-Bey L,
    3. Varelas PN,
    4. Ulmer JL, et al

    . Imaging of cerebrovascular disease in pregnancy and the puerperium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:26–38 doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15059 pmid:26491895

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    American College of Radiology. ACR Manual on Contrast Media. 2021. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Contrast-Manual. Accessed July 29, 2021
24. 24.↵
    2. Hand JW,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Thomas EL, et al

    . Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:883–93 doi:10.1002/mrm.20824 pmid:16508913

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Barrera CA,
    3. Francavilla ML,
    4. Serai SD, et al

    . Specific absorption rate and specific energy dose: comparison of 1.5-T versus 3.0-T fetal MRI. Radiology 2020;295:664–74 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191550 pmid:32255418

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Lichy MP,
    3. Horger W,
    4. Mugler JP, et al

    . T2-weighted 3D MR imaging of the Torso–First Clinical Experiences with SPACE. CLINICAL SPACE. 2005;1. https://cdn0.scrvt.com/39b415fb07de4d9656c7b516d8e2d907/1800000000081895/b135e0f62913/T2-weighted_3D_MR_Imaging_of_the_Torso_Page_58-60_1800000000081895.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2020
27. 27.↵
    2. Bitar R,
    3. Leung G,
    4. Perng R, et al

    . MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics 2006;26:513–37 doi:10.1148/rg.262055063 pmid:16549614

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Mihai G,
    3. Winner MW,
    4. Raman SV, et al

    . Assessment of carotid stenosis using three-dimensional T2-weighted dark blood imaging: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:449–55 doi:10.1002/jmri.22839 pmid:22147541

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Morelli JN,
    3. Runge VM,
    4. Ai F, et al

    . An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts. Radiographics 2011;31:849–66 doi:10.1148/rg.313105115 pmid:21571661

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Wang D,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. Yin B, et al

    . 3D fast spin-echo T1 black-blood imaging for the preoperative detection of venous sinus invasion by meningioma. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:65–73 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0637-1 pmid:29071386

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Qureshi AI,
    3. Qureshi Z,
    4. Center SR

    . A classification scheme for assessing recanalization and collateral formation following cerebral venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2010;3:1–2 pmid:22518253

    PubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Ferro JM,
    3. Bendszus M,
    4. Jansen O, et al

    ; RE-SPECT CVT Study Group. Recanalization after cerebral venous thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate versus dose-adjusted warfarin in patients with cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis. Int J Stroke 2022;17:189–97 doi:10.1177/17474930211006303 pmid:33724104

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Aguiar de Sousa D,
    3. Lucas Neto L,
    4. Arauz A, et al

    . Early recanalization in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis treated with anticoagulation. Stroke 2020;51:1174–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028532 pmid:32114929

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Ghoneim A,
    3. Straiton J,
    4. Pollard C, et al

    . Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. Clin Radiol 2020;75:254–64 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.12.009 pmid:31980184

    CrossRefPubMed