Deep Learning for Synthetic CT from Bone MRI in the Head and Neck

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Du J,
   2. Hermida JC,
   3. Diaz E, et al

   . Assessment of cortical bone with clinical and ultrashort echo time sequences. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:697–704 doi:10.1002/mrm.24497 pmid:23001864

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Schieban K,
   2. Weiger M,
   3. Hennel F, et al

   . ZTE imaging with enhanced flip angle using modulated excitation. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:684–93 doi:10.1002/mrm.25464 pmid:25242318

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Eley KA,
   2. McIntyre AG,
   3. Watt-Smith SR, et al

   . “Black bone” MRI: a partial flip angle technique for radiation reduction in craniofacial imaging. Br J Radiol 2012;85:272–78 doi:10.1259/bjr/95110289 pmid:22391497

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Tiberi G,
   2. Costagli M,
   3. Biagi L, et al

   . SAR prediction in adults and children by combining measured B1+ maps and simulations at 7.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:1048–55 doi:10.1002/jmri.25241 pmid:27042956

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Alibek S,
   2. Vogel M,
   3. Sun W, et al

   . Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:360–63 doi:10.5152/dir.2014.13458 pmid:24808439

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Eley KA,
   2. Watt-Smith SR,
   3. Golding SJ

   . “Black bone” MRI: a potential alternative to CT when imaging the head and neck: report of eight clinical cases and review of the Oxford experience. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1457–64 doi:10.1259/bjr/16830245 pmid:23091288

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Lu A,
   2. Gorny KC,
   3. Ho ML

   . Zero TE MRI for craniofacial bone imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1562–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6175 pmid:31467238

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Cho SB,
   2. Baek HJ,
   3. Ryu KH, et al

   . Clinical feasibility of zero TE skull MRI in patients with head trauma in comparison with CT: a single-center study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:109–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5916 pmid:30545839

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Hsu SH,
   2. Cao Y,
   3. Lawrence TS, et al

   . Quantitative characterizations of ultrashort echo (UTE) images for supporting air-bone separation in the head. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:2869–80 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/2869 pmid:25776205

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Ghose S,
    2. Dowling JA,
    3. Rai R, et al

    . Substitute CT generation from a single ultra short time echo MRI sequence: preliminary study. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:2950–60 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa508a pmid:28306546

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Kraus KM,
    2. Jäkel O,
    3. Niebuhr NI, et al

    . Generation of synthetic CT data using patient specific daily MR image data and image registration. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:1358–77 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa5200 pmid:28114107

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wiesinger F,
    2. Bylund M,
    3. Yang J, et al

    . Zero TE-based pseudo-CT image conversion in the head and its application in PET/MR attenuation correction and MR-guided radiation therapy planning. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:1440–51 doi:10.1002/mrm.27134 pmid:29457287

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Leynes AP,
    2. Yang J,
    3. Wiesinger F, et al

    . Zero-echo-time and Dixon deep pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): direct generation of pseudo-CT images for pelvic PET/MRI attenuation correction using deep convolutional neural networks with multiparametric MRI. J Nucl Med 2018;59:852–58 doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.198051 pmid:29084824

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.
    1. Gong K,
    2. Yang J,
    3. Kim K, et al

    . Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on Dixon and ZTE MR images. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:125011 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aac763 pmid:29790857

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.
    1. Nie D,
    2. Cao X,
    3. Gao Y, et al

    . Estimating CT image from MRI data using 3D fully convolutional networks. Deep Learn Data Label Med Appl (2016) 2016;2016:170–78 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_18 pmid:29075680

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.
    1. Andreasen D,
    2. Van Leemput K,
    3. Hansen RH, et al

    . Patch-based generation of a pseudo CT from conventional MRI sequences for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain. Med Phys 2015;42:1596–605 doi:10.1118/1.4914158 pmid:25832050

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Boukellouz W,
    2. Moussaoui A

    . Magnetic resonance-driven pseudo CT image using patch-based multi-modal feature extraction and ensemble learning with stacked generalization. Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences 2021;33:999–1007

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Otsu N

    . A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1979;9:62–66 doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Ronneberger O,
    2. Fischer P,
    3. Brox T

    . U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). arXiv 1505.04597 [cs.CV] 2015 https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597. Accessed March 30, 2021
20. 20.↵
    1. Simonyan K,
    2. Zisserman A

    . Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 1409.1556 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556v4. Accessed March 30, 2021
21. 21.↵
    1. Deng J,
    2. Dong W,
    3. Socher R, et al

    . ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami Beach, Florida. June 20–25, 2009
22. 22.↵
    1. Kingma DP,
    2. Ba J

    . Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv 1412.6980 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. Accessed March 30, 2021
23. 23.↵
    1. Goodfellow I, et al

    . Generative adversarial nets. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. December 8–13, 2014; 2672–80
24. 24.
    1. Wolterink JM,
    2. Dinkla Am Savenije MH, et al

    . Deep MR to CT synthesis using unpaired data. Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. arXiv 1708.01155 [cs.CV] 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01155. Accessed March 30, 2021
25. 25.
    1. Zhu JY,
    2. Park T,
    3. Isola P, et al

    . Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy. October 22–29, 2017 doi:10.1109/ICCV.2017.244

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    1. Isola P,
    2. Zhu JY,
    3. Zhou T, et al

    . Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, Hawaii. July 21–26, 2017 doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.632

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Qin W, et al

    . Magnetic resonance image (MRI) synthesis from brain computed tomography (CT) images based on deep learning methods for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. Quan Imaging Med Surg 2020;10:1223–36 doi:10.21037/qims-19-885 pmid:32550132

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Kornblith S,
    2. Shlens J,
    3. Le QV

    . Do better imagenet models transfer better? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, California. June 15–20, 2019 doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00277

    CrossRef
29. 29.
    1. Raghu M,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Kleinberg J, et al

    . Transfusion: understanding transfer learning for medical imaging. arXiv 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07208. Accessed March 30, 2021
30. 30.↵
    1. Anwar SM,
    2. Majid M,
    3. Qayyum A, et al

    . Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: a review. J Med Sys 2018;42: 226 doi:10.1007/s10916-018-1088-1 pmid:30298337

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Boulanger M,
    2. Nunes JC,
    3. Chourak H, et al

    . Deep learning methods to generate synthetic CT from MRI in radiotherapy: a literature review. Phys Med 2021;89:265–81 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.027 pmid:34474325

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Spadea MF,
    2. Maspero M,
    3. Zaffino P, et al

    . Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: a review. Med Phys 2021;48:6537–66 doi:10.1002/mp.15150 pmid:34407209

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Bambach S,
    2. Ho ML

    . Bone MRI: can it replace CT: 2nd AI Award. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology, Artificial Intelligence Workshop, February 5, 2021
34. 34.
    1. Smith M,
    2. Bambach S,
    3. Selvaraj B, et al

    . Zero-TE MRI: potential applications in the oral cavity and oropharynx. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2021;30: 105–15 doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000279 pmid:33828062

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.
    1. Kobayashi N,
    2. Bambach S,
    3. Ho ML

    . Ultrashort echo-time MR imaging of the pediatric head and neck. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021;29:583–93 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.008 pmid:34717846

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Wiesinger F,
    2. Ho ML

    . Zero-TE MRI: principles and applications in the head and neck. Br J Radiol 2022 June 10. [Epub ahead of print]
37. 37.↵
    1. Aouadi S,
    2. Vasic A,
    3. Paloor S, et al

    . Generation of synthetic CT using multi-scale and dual-contrast patches for brain MRI-only external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med 2017;42:174–84 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.132 pmid:29173912

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.
    1. Dinkla AM,
    2. Florkow MC,
    3. Maspero M, et al

    . Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for head and neck radiotherapy generated by a patch-based three-dimensional convolutional neural network. Med Phys 2019;46:4095–104 doi:10.1002/mp.13663 pmid:31206701

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.
    1. Roy S,
    2. Carass A,
    3. Jog A, et al

    . MR to CT registration of brains using image synthesis. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2014;9034 doi:10.1117/12.2043954] pmid:25057341

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.
    1. Lee J,
    2. Carass A,
    3. Jog A, et al

    . Multi-atlas-based CT synthesis from conventional MRI with patch-based refinement for MRI-based radiotherapy planning. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2017;10133:1013311 doi:10.1117/12.2254571 pmid:29142336

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Klages P,
    2. Benslimane I,
    3. Riyahi S, et al

    . Patch-based generative adversarial neural network models for head and neck MR-only planning. Med Phys 2020;47:626–42 doi:10.1002/mp.13927 pmid:31733164

    CrossRefPubMed