Peer Learning in Neuroradiology: Not as Easy as It Sounds

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Larson DB,
   2. Donnelly LF,
   3. Podberesky DJ, et al

   . Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: answering the call of the Institute of Medicine report on diagnostic error. Radiology 2017;283:231–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016161254 pmid:27673509

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Balogh EP,
   2. Miller BT,
   3. Ball JR

   1. Balogh EP,
   2. Miller BT,
   3. Ball JR

   ,et al. Committee on diagnostic error in health care. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, et al. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press; December 29, 2015
3. 3.↵
   1. Larson DB,
   2. Broder JC,
   3. Bhargavan-Chatfield M, et al

   . Transitioning from peer review to peer learning: report of the 2020 Peer Learning Summit. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:1499–508 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.016 pmid:32771491

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   American College of Radiology. Peer Learning Resources. www.acr.org/Practice-Management-Quality-Informatics/Peer-Learning-Resources. Accessed May 11, 2023
5. 5.↵
   American Board of Radiology. Participatory Activities. March 17, 2022. https://www.theabr.org/diagnostic-radiology/maintenance-of-certification/improvement-medical-practice/participatory-activities. Accessed May 18, 2023
6. 6.↵
   The Joint Commission. What are the key elements needed to meet the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) requirements? https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/standard-faqs/hospital-and-hospital-clinics/medical-staff-ms/000001500. Accessed May 21, 2023
7. 7.↵
   1. Babiarz LS,
   2. Yousem DM

   . Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:37–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2704 pmid:22033725

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Borgstede JP,
   2. Lewis RS,
   3. Bhargavan M, et al

   . RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:59–65 doi:10.1016/S1546-1440(03)00002-4 pmid:17411521

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Ivanovic V,
   2. Assadsangabi R,
   3. Hacein-Bey L, et al

   . Neuroradiology diagnostic errors at a tertiary academic centre: effect of participation in tumour boards and physician experience. Clin Radiol 2022;77:607–12 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2022.04.006 pmid:35589432

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Assadsangabi R,
    2. Maralani P,
    3. Chen AF, et al

    . Common blind spots and interpretive errors of neck imaging. Clin Imaging 2022;82:29–37 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.019 pmid:34773810

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Vong S,
    2. Chang J,
    3. Assadsangabi R, et al

    . Analysis of perceptual errors in skull-base pathology. Neuroradiol J 2022 Jun 18 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/19714009221108679 pmid:35722674

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Sharpe RE Jr.,
    2. Huffman RI,
    3. Congdon RG, et al

    . Implementation of a peer learning program replacing score-based peer review in a multispecialty integrated practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:949–56 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.19891 pmid:30207788

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kadom N,
    2. Reddy KM,
    3. Khanna G, et al

    . Peer learning program metrics: a pediatric neuroradiology example. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1680–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7673 pmid:36229162

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lee CS,
    2. Neumann C,
    3. Jha P, et al

    . Current status and future wish list of peer review: A National Questionnaire of U.S. Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;214:493–97 doi:10.2214/AJR.19.22194 pmid:31939700

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Chen JY,
    2. Vedantham S,
    3. Lexa FJ

    . Burnout and work-work imbalance in radiology—wicked problems on a global scale: a baseline pre-COVID-19 survey of US neuroradiologists compared to international radiologists and adjacent staff. Eur J Radiol 2022;155:110153 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110153 pmid:35058099

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Ngo AV,
    2. Stanescu AL,
    3. Swenson DW, et al

    . Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences. Pediatr Radiol 2019;49:526–30 doi:10.1007/s00247-018-4305-7 pmid:30923885

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Edmondson AC

    . The Fearless Organization. John Wiley & Sons 2018;175–77
18. 18.↵
    1. Edmondson A

    . Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 1999;44:350–83 doi:10.2307/2666999

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Holley LC,
    2. Steiner S

    . Safe space: student perspectives on classroom environment. J Soc Work Educ 2005;41:49–64 doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300343

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Panadero E,
    2. Alqassab M

    . An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2019;44:1253–78 doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Khader A,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Wald C, et al

    . Abdominal peer learning: advantages and lessons learned. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023;48:1526–35 doi:10.1007/s00261-023-03846-9 pmid:36801958

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Donnelly LF,
    2. Larson DB,
    3. Heller RE III., et al

    . Practical suggestions on how to move from peer review to peer learning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:578–82 doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18660 pmid:29323555

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Broder JC,
    2. Scheirey CD,
    3. Wald C

    . Step by step: a structured approach for proposing, developing and implementing a radiology peer learning program. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2021;50:457–60 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.02.007 pmid:33663894

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bender LC,
    2. Linnau KF,
    3. Meier EN, et al

    . Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1320–27 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8972 pmid:23169725

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Eisenberg RL,
    2. Cunningham ML,
    3. Siewert B, et al

    . Survey of faculty perceptions regarding a peer review system. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:397–401 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.08.011 pmid:24144835

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Chaudhry H,
    2. Del Gaizo AJ,
    3. Frigini LA, et al

    . Forty-one million RADPEER reviews later: what we have learned and are still learning. J Am Coll Radiol 202017:779–85 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023 pmid:31991118

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Trinh TW,
    2. Boland GW,
    3. Khorasani R

    . Improving radiology peer learning: comparing a novel electronic peer learning tool and a traditional score-based peer review system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212:135–41 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.19958 pmid:30403533

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Panagioti M,
    2. Geraghty K,
    3. Johnson J, et al

    . Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:1317–31 (Retraction published in JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:931) doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713 pmid:30193239

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Weissman IA,
    2. Van Geertruyden P,
    3. Prabhakar AM, et al

    . Practice resources to address radiologist burnout. J Am Coll Radiol 2023;20:494–99 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2023.03.007 pmid:36934890

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Eschelman DJ,
    2. Sullivan KL,
    3. Parker L, et al

    . The relationship of clinical and academic productivity in a university hospital radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:27–31 doi:10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740027 pmid:10628448

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Yousem DM

    . Academic and clinical productivity: relative value units do not tell the whole story. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1598–600 doi:10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761598 pmid:11373242

    CrossRefPubMed