Parieto-Occipital Injury on Diffusion MRI Correlates with Poor Neurologic Outcome following Cardiac Arrest

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Virani SS,
   2. Alonso A,
   3. Aparicio HJ, et al

   ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;143:e254–743 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 pmid:33501848

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Madden LK,
   2. Hill M,
   3. May TL, et al

   . The implementation of targeted temperature management: an evidence-based guideline from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2017;27:468–87 doi:10.1007/s12028-017-0469-5 pmid:29038971

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. An C,
   2. You Y,
   3. Park JS, et al

   . The cut-off value of a qualitative brain diffusion-weighted image (DWI) scoring system to predict poor neurologic outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after target temperature management. Resuscitation 2020;157:202–10 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.130] pmid:32931850

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Wouters A,
   2. Scheldeman L,
   3. Plessers S, et al

   . Added value of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient values for neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest. Neurology 2021;96:e2611–18 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011991 pmid:33837117

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Bevers MB,
   2. Scirica BM,
   3. Avery KR, et al

   . Combination of clinical exam, MRI and EEG to predict outcome following cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management. Neurocrit Care 2018;29:396–403 doi:10.1007/s12028-018-0559-z pmid:29949008

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Reynolds AS,
   2. Guo X,
   3. Matthews E, et al

   . Post-anoxic quantitative MRI changes may predict emergence from coma and functional outcomes at discharge. Resuscitation 2017;117:87–90 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.010 pmid:28624592

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Kim J,
   2. Kim K,
   3. Suh GJ, et al

   . Prognostication of cardiac arrest survivors using low apparent diffusion coefficient cluster volume. Resuscitation 2016;100:18–24 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.013 pmid:26774174

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Hirsch KG,
   2. Mlynash M,
   3. Eyngorn I, et al

   . Multi-center study of diffusion-weighted imaging in coma after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care 2016;24:82–89 doi:10.1007/s12028-015-0179-9 pmid:26156112

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kim J,
   2. Kim K,
   3. Hong S, et al

   . Low apparent diffusion coefficient cluster-based analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for prognostication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation 2013;84:1393–99 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.011 pmid:23603152

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Choi BS,
    3. Kim K, et al

    . Prognostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI combined with NSE in comatose cardiac arrest survivors treated with mild hypothermia. Neurocrit Care 2012;17:412–20 doi:10.1007/s12028-012-9773-2 pmid:22932993

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Choi SP,
    2. Park KN,
    3. Park HK, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the clinical outcome of comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: a cohort study. Crit Care 2010;14:R17 doi:10.1186/cc8874 pmid:20152021

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hirsch KG,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Jansen S, et al

    . Prognostic value of a qualitative brain MRI scoring system after cardiac arrest. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:430–37 doi:10.1111/jon.12143 pmid:25040353

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Wijman CAC,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Caulfield AF, et al

    . Prognostic value of brain diffusion-weighted imaging after cardiac arrest. Ann Neurol 2009;65:394–402 doi:10.1002/ana.21632 pmid:19399889

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Hirsch KG,
    2. Fischbein N,
    3. Mlynash M, et al

    . Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post–cardiac arrest coma. Neurology 2020;94:e1684–92 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009289 pmid:32269116

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wu O,
    2. Sorensen AG,
    3. Benner T, et al

    . Comatose patients with cardiac arrest: predicting clinical outcome with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2009;252:173–81 doi:10.1148/radiol.2521081232 pmid:19420318

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Moon HK,
    2. Jang J,
    3. Park KN, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of relative volume of low apparent diffusion coefficient value can predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2018;126:36–42 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.020 pmid:29474879

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Torres-Espín A,
    2. Chou A,
    3. Huie JR, et al

    . Reproducible analysis of disease space via principal components using the novel R package syndRomics. eLife 2021;10:e61812 doi:10.7554/eLife.61812 pmid:33443012

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Snider SB,
    2. Fischer D,
    3. McKeown ME, et al

    . Regional distribution of brain injury after cardiac arrest: clinical and electrographic correlates. Neurology 2022;98:e1238–47 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013301 pmid:35017304

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A,
    2. Noirhomme Q,
    3. Tshibanda LJ, et al

    . Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain 2010;133:161–71 doi:10.1093/brain/awp313 pmid:20034928

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Li R,
    2. Utevsky AV,
    3. Huettel SA, et al

    . Developmental maturation of the precuneus as a functional core of the default-mode network. 2019;31:1506–19 doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01426 pmid:31112473
21. 21.↵
    1. Silva S,
    2. de Pasquale F,
    3. Vuillaume C, et al

    . Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology 2015;85:2036–44 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002196] pmid:26561296

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Koenig MA,
    2. Holt JL,
    3. Ernst T, et al

    . MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest. Neurocrit Care 2014;20:348–57 doi:[10.1007/s12028-014-9953-3 pmid:24464830

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Sair HI,
    2. Hannawi Y,
    3. Li S, et al

    ; Neuroimaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery (NICER) Consortium. Early functional connectome integrity and 1-year recovery in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Radiology 2018;287:247–55 doi:10.1007/s12028-014-9953-3 pmid:29043908

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Wagner F,
    2. Hänggi M,
    3. Weck A, et al

    . Outcome prediction with resting-state functional connectivity after cardiac arrest. Sci Rep 2020;10:11695 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68683-y pmid:32678212

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ryoo SM,
    2. Jeon S-B,
    3. Sohn CH, et al

    ; Korean Hypothermia Network Investigators. Predicting outcome with diffusion-weighted imaging in cardiac arrest patients receiving hypothermia therapy: multicenter retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 2015;43:2370–77 doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001263 pmid:26284621

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Horwitz B,
    2. Duara R,
    3. Rapoport SI

    . Intercorrelations of glucose metabolic rates between brain regions: application to healthy males in a state of reduced sensory input. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1984;4:484–99 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1984.73 pmid:6501442

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Anderson RC,
    2. Patel V,
    3. Sheikh-Bahaei N, et al

    . Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): pathophysiology and neuro-imaging. Front Neurol 2020;11:463 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00463 pmid:32612567

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Sandroni C,
    2. D’Arrigo S,
    3. Cacciola S, et al

    . Prediction of good neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2022;48:389–413 doi:10.1007/s00134-022-06618-z pmid:35244745

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Sekhon MS,
    2. Ainslie PN,
    3. Griesdale DE

    . Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest: a “two-hit” model. Crit Care 2017;21:90 doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1670-9 pmid:28403909

    CrossRefPubMed