Modified Dynamic CT Myelography for Type 1 and 2 CSF Leaks: A Procedural Approach

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schievink WI,
   2. Maya MM,
   3. Jean-Pierre S, et al

   . A classification system of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2016;87:673–79 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002986 pmid:27440149

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Farb RI,
   2. Nicholson PJ,
   3. Peng PW, et al

   . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a systematic imaging approach for CSF leak localization and management based on MRI and digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:745–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6016 pmid:30923083

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Dobrocky T,
   2. Winklehner A,
   3. Breiding PS, et al

   . Spine MRI in spontaneous intracranial hypotension for CSF leak detection: nonsuperiority of intrathecal gadolinium to heavily T2-weighted fat-saturated sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1309–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6592 pmid:32554417

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Thielen KR,
   2. Sillery JC,
   3. Morris JM, et al

   . Ultrafast dynamic computed tomography myelography for the precise identification of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks caused by spiculated spinal osteophytes. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;22:324–31 doi:10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14209 pmid:25555057

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Dobrocky T,
   2. Mosimann PJ,
   3. Zibold F, et al

   . Cryptogenic cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: role of dynamic CT myelography. Radiology 2018;289:766–72 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180732 pmid:30226459

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hoxworth JM,
   2. Patel AC,
   3. Bosch EP, et al

   . Localization of a rapid CSF leak with digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:516–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1294 pmid:18842766

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Hoxworth JM,
   2. Trentman TL,
   3. Kotsenas AL, et al

   . The role of digital subtraction myelography in the diagnosis and localization of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:649–53 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8238 pmid:22915407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Piechowiak EI,
   2. Pospieszny K,
   3. Haeni L, et al

   . Role of conventional dynamic myelography for detection of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks: optimizing the technique. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:633–41 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00943-w pmid:32845353

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Mamlouk MD,
   2. Shen PY,
   3. Jun P, et al

   . Spontaneous spinal CSF leaks stratified by age, body mass index, and spinal level. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1068–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7548 pmid:35738670

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Tay ASS,
    2. Maya M,
    3. Moser FG, et al

    . Computed tomography vs heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance myelography for the initial evaluation of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1275–76 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2868 pmid:34459855

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Shlapak DP,
    3. Benson JC, et al

    . Osseous spicules of the posterior elements causing fast cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Neuroradiology 2022;64:1689–93 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-02943-8 pmid:35410398

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Verdoorn JT,
    3. Shlapak DP, et al

    . Lateral decubitus dynamic CT myelography for fast cerebrospinal fluid leak localization. Neuroradiology 2022;64:1897–903 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-02985-y pmid:35614322

    CrossRefPubMed