Reply:

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Branstetter BF,
   2. Reddy N,
   3. Patel K, et al

   . Sagittal angle of the trigeminal nerve at the porus trigeminus: a novel measurement to distinguish different causes of classic trigeminal neuralgia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1460–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7634 pmid:36109121

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Hughes MA,
   2. Jani RH,
   3. Fakhran S, et al

   . Significance of degree of neurovascular compression in surgery for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2020;133:411–16 doi:10.3171/2019.3.JNS183174 pmid:31200377

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Sindou M,
   2. Howeidy T,
   3. Acevedo G

   . Anatomical observations during microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (with correlations between topography of pain and site of the neurovascular conflict): prospective study in a series of 579 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:1–13 doi:10.1007/s701-002-8269-4 pmid:11807642

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Jani RH,
   2. Hughes MA,
   3. Gold MS, et al

   . Trigeminal nerve compression without trigeminal neuralgia: intraoperative vs imaging evidence. Neurosurgery 2019;84:60–65 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx636 pmid:29425330

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Maarbjerg S,
   2. Wolfram F,
   3. Gozalov A, et al

   . Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Brain 2015;138:311–19 doi:10.1093/brain/awu349 pmid:25541189

   CrossRefPubMed