Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Clinical Applications of Conebeam CTP Imaging in Cerebral Disease: A Systematic Review

A.H.A. Zaid Al-Kaylani, R.C.L. Schuurmann, W.D. Maathuis, R.H.J.A. Slart, J.-P.P.M. de Vries and R.P.H. Bokkers
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2023, 44 (8) 922-927; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7930
A.H.A. Zaid Al-Kaylani
aDepartment of Radiology (A.H.A.Z.A., R.H.J.A.S., R.P.H.B.), Medical Imaging Center
bDepartment of Surgery (A.H.A.Z.A., R.C.L.S., J.-P.M.P.d.V.), Division of Vascular Surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.H.A. Zaid Al-Kaylani
R.C.L. Schuurmann
bDepartment of Surgery (A.H.A.Z.A., R.C.L.S., J.-P.M.P.d.V.), Division of Vascular Surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.C.L. Schuurmann
W.D. Maathuis
dDepartment of Biomedical Photonic Imaging (W.D.M., R.H.J.A.S.), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W.D. Maathuis
R.H.J.A. Slart
aDepartment of Radiology (A.H.A.Z.A., R.H.J.A.S., R.P.H.B.), Medical Imaging Center
cDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (R.H.J.A.S.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
dDepartment of Biomedical Photonic Imaging (W.D.M., R.H.J.A.S.), Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.H.J.A. Slart
J.-P.P.M. de Vries
bDepartment of Surgery (A.H.A.Z.A., R.C.L.S., J.-P.M.P.d.V.), Division of Vascular Surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.-P.P.M. de Vries
R.P.H. Bokkers
aDepartment of Radiology (A.H.A.Z.A., R.H.J.A.S., R.P.H.B.), Medical Imaging Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.P.H. Bokkers
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Ackerson T, et al
    . Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke—A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ma H,
    2. Campbell B. V,
    3. Parsons MW, et al
    ; EXTEND Investigators. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1795–803 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1813046 pmid:31067369
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nogueira RG,
    2. Jadhav AP,
    3. Haussen DC, et al
    ; DAWN Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Kemp S, et al
    ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. van der Lugt A, et al
    ; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2016;316:1279–88 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13647 pmid:27673305
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Meretoja A,
    2. Keshtkaran M,
    3. Saver JL, et al
    . Stroke thrombolysis. Stroke 2014;45:1053–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002910 pmid:24627114
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dargazanli C,
    2. Consoli A,
    3. Barral M, et al
    . Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:90–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4968 pmid:27811134
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mendez B,
    2. Requena M,
    3. Aires A, et al
    . Direct transfer to angio-suite to reduce workflow times and increase favorable clinical outcome. Stroke 2018;49:2723–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021989 pmid:30355182
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ribo M,
    2. Boned S,
    3. Rubiera M, et al
    . Direct transfer to angiosuite to reduce door-to-puncture time in thrombectomy for acute stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:221–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013038 pmid:28446535
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brehm A,
    2. Tsogkas I,
    3. Maier IL, et al
    . One-stop management with perfusion for transfer patients with stroke due to a large-vessel occlusion: feasibility and effects on in-hospital times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1330–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6129 pmid:31296523
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Goyal N,
    3. Chen M, et al
    . Direct to angiography vs repeated imaging approaches in transferred patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:916–26 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1707 pmid:34125153
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Bähr M,
    3. Liman J, et al
    . One stop management in acute stroke: first mothership patient transported directly to the angiography suite. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:389–91 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0574-z pmid:28271160
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bouslama M,
    2. Haussen DC,
    3. Grossberg JA, et al
    . Flat-panel detector CT assessment in stroke to reduce times to intra-arterial treatment: a study of multiphase computed tomography angiography in the angiography suite to bypass conventional imaging. Int J Stroke 2021;16:63–72 doi:10.1177/1747493019895655 pmid:31902347
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Requena M,
    2. Olivé-Gadea M,
    3. Muchada M, et al
    . Direct to angiography suite without stopping for computed tomography imaging for patients with acute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1099–107 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2385 pmid:34338742
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zellerhoff M,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Strother CM, et al
    . Measurement of cerebral blood volume using angiographic C-arm systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering 7262, February 26, 2009. Lake Buena Vista, Florida doi:10.1117/12.812097
    CrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ganguly A,
    2. Fieselmann A,
    3. Marks M, et al
    . Cerebral CT perfusion using an interventional C-arm imaging system: cerebral blood flow measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1525–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2518 pmid:21757522
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Shamseer L,
    3. Clarke M, et al
    ; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1 doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 pmid:25554246
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ouzzani M,
    2. Hammady H,
    3. Fedorowicz Z, et al
    . Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210 doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 pmid:27919275
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Whiting PF,
    2. Rutjes AW,
    3. Westwood ME, et al
    ; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529–36 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 pmid:22007046
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Klotz E,
    2. König M
    . Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:170–84 doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00009-1 pmid:10452715
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Axel L
    . Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. Radiology 1980;137:679–86 doi:10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648 pmid:7003648
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kamran M,
    2. Byrne JV
    . C-arm flat detector computed tomography parenchymal blood volume imaging: the nature of parenchymal blood volume parameter and the feasibility of parenchymal blood volume imaging in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Neuroradiology 2015;57:937–49 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1545-1 pmid:26022353
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al
    . Flat detector CT in the evaluation of brain parenchyma, intracranial vasculature, and cerebral blood volume: a pilot study in patients with acute symptoms of cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1462–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2083 pmid:20378700
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al
    . Cerebral blood volume imaging by flat detector computed tomography in comparison to conventional multislice perfusion CT. Eur Radiol 2011;21:882–89 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1957-6 pmid:20857117
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Engelhorn T, et al
    . Feasibility of cerebral blood volume mapping by flat panel detector CT in the angiography suite: first experience in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:618–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2839 pmid:22207301
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Wang B,
    3. Han J, et al
    . Feasibility study of perfusion imaging using flat detector CT with an intra-arterial injection protocol compared to conventional multi-slice perfusion CT with an intravenous injection protocol. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:409–15 doi:10.1177/159101991301900402 pmid:24355143
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zhang Y-W,
    2. Hong B,
    3. Huang Q-H, et al
    . The feasibility and clinical application of flat-panel detector computer tomography in evaluating cerebral blood volume: an initial prospective study. J Interv Radiol (China) 2012;21:265–69 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2012.04.001
    CrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Royalty K,
    2. Manhart M,
    3. Pulfer K, et al
    . C-arm CT measurement of cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow using a novel high-speed acquisition and a single intravenous contrast injection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2131–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3536 pmid:23703149
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Bizais Y,
    2. Barillot C,
    3. Di Paola R
    , eds. Information Processing in Medical Imaging: Computational Imaging and Vision (CIVI, volume 3). Springer; 1995.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Viola P,
    2. Wells WM III.
    . Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International Journal of Computer Vision 1997;24:137–54 doi:10.1023/A:1007958904918
    CrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fieselmann A,
    2. Kowarschik M,
    3. Ganguly A, et al
    . Deconvolution-based CT and MR brain perfusion measurement: theoretical model revisited and practical implementation details. Int J Biomed Imaging 2011;2011:467563 doi:10.1155/2011/467563 pmid:21904538
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Fieselmann A,
    2. Ganguly A,
    3. Deuerling-Zheng Y, et al
    . Interventional 4-D C-arm CT perfusion imaging using interleaved scanning and partial reconstruction interpolation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:892–906 doi:10.1109/TMI.2011.2181531 pmid:22203707
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Guo WY,
    3. Chang FC, et al
    . Using flat-panel perfusion imaging to measure cerebral hemodynamics: a pilot feasibility study in patients with carotid stenosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3529 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003529 pmid:27196456
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chen LW,
    2. Lin CJ,
    3. Guo WY, et al
    . Evaluating cerebral hemodynamics using quantitative digital subtraction angiography and flat-detector computed tomography perfusion imaging: a comparative study in patients with carotid stenosis. J Chin Med Assoc 2018;81:977–84 doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2018.01.016 pmid:30146457
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al
    . Dynamic angiography and perfusion imaging using flat detector CT in the angiography suite: a pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1964–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4383 pmid:26066625
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kurmann CC,
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Cooke DL, et al
    . Evaluation of time-resolved whole brain flat panel detector perfusion imaging using RAPID ANGIO in patients with acute stroke: comparison with CT perfusion imaging. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:387–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018464 pmid:35396333
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Ortega-Gutierrez S,
    2. Quispe-Orozco D,
    3. Schafer S, et al
    . Angiography suite cone-beam CT perfusion for selection of thrombectomy patients: a pilot study. J Neuroimaging 2022;32:493–501 doi:10.1111/jon.12988 pmid:35315169
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Zhang J, et al
    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Requena M,
    2. Olivé M,
    3. García-Tornel Á, et al
    . Time matters. Stroke 2020;51:1766–71 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028586 pmid:32390548
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Sincic R,
    3. Sridhar D, et al
    . Cerebral perfusion CT: technique and clinical applications. J Neuroradiol 2008;35:253–60 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2008.03.005 pmid:18466974
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. de Lucas EM,
    2. Sánchez E,
    3. Gutiérrez A, et al
    . CT protocol for acute stroke: tips and tricks for general radiologists. Radiographics 2008;28:1673–87 doi:10.1148/rg.286085502 pmid:18936029
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Smith WS,
    3. Ko NU, et al
    . Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:720–29 pmid:15140710
    PubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Wiesmann M,
    2. Berg S,
    3. Bohner G, et al
    . Dose reduction in dynamic perfusion CT of the brain: effects of the scan frequency on measurements of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and mean transit time. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2967–74 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1083-x pmid:18618120
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Kämena A,
    2. Streitparth F,
    3. Grieser C, et al
    . Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution for the calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:111–18 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.025 pmid:17383135
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Abels B,
    2. Klotz E,
    3. Tomandl BF, et al
    . CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke: a comparison of 2-second and 1-second temporal resolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1632–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2576 pmid:21816919
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Mnyusiwalla A,
    2. Aviv RI,
    3. Symons SP
    . Radiation dose from multidetector row CT imaging for acute stroke. Neuroradiology 2009;51:635–40 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0543-6 pmid:19506845
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Diekmann S,
    2. Siebert E,
    3. Juran R, et al
    . Dose exposure of patients undergoing comprehensive stroke imaging by multidetector-row CT: comparison of 320-detector row and 64-detector row CT scanners. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1003–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1971 pmid:20110373
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Cohnen M,
    2. Wittsack HJ,
    3. Assadi S, et al
    . Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1741–45 pmid:16971627
    PubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Kamran M,
    2. Nagaraja S,
    3. Byrne JV
    . C-arm flat detector computed tomography: the technique and its applications in interventional neuro-radiology. Neuroradiology 2010;52:319–27 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0609-5 pmid:19859702
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sun CJ,
    2. Ribo M,
    3. Goyal M, et al
    . Door‐to‐puncture: a practical metric for capturing and enhancing system processes associated with endovascular stroke care, preliminary results from the rapid reperfusion registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000859 doi:10.1161/jaha.114.000859] pmid:24772523
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 44 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 44, Issue 8
1 Aug 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Applications of Conebeam CTP Imaging in Cerebral Disease: A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.H.A. Zaid Al-Kaylani, R.C.L. Schuurmann, W.D. Maathuis, R.H.J.A. Slart, J.-P.P.M. de Vries, R.P.H. Bokkers
Clinical Applications of Conebeam CTP Imaging in Cerebral Disease: A Systematic Review
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2023, 44 (8) 922-927; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7930

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Conebeam CTP Imaging in Cerebral Diseases Review
A.H.A. Zaid Al-Kaylani, R.C.L. Schuurmann, W.D. Maathuis, R.H.J.A. Slart, J.-P.P.M. de Vries, R.P.H. Bokkers
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2023, 44 (8) 922-927; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7930
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire