High-Resolution MRA Cerebrovascular Findings in a Tri-Ethnic Population

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jäger HR,
   2. Grieve JP

   . Advances in non-invasive imaging of intracranial vascular disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:1–5 pmid:10700757

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Bos D,
   2. Poels MM,
   3. Adams HH, et al

   . Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Radiology 2016;281:507–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160218 pmid:27337027

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Vernooij MW,
   2. Ikram MA,
   3. Tanghe HL, et al

   . Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1821–28 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070972 pmid:17978290

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ,
   2. van der Grond J,
   3. de Leeuw FE, et al

   . Circle of Willis: morphologic variation on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiograms. Radiology 1998;207:103–11 doi:10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530305 pmid:9530305

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. De Caro J,
   2. Ciacciarelli A,
   3. Tessitore A, et al

   . Variants of the circle of Willis in ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol 2021;268:3799–807 doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10454-4 pmid:33786665

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Menshawi K,
   2. Mohr JP,
   3. Gutierrez J

   . A functional perspective on the embryology and anatomy of the cerebral blood supply. J Stroke 2015;17:144–58 doi:10.5853/jos.2015.17.2.144 pmid:26060802

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Rinaldo L,
   2. McCutcheon BA,
   3. Snyder KA, et al

   . A1 segment hypoplasia associated with cerebral infarction after anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture. J Neurosurg Sci 2019;63:359–64 doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03778-4 pmid:27391117

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Chuang YM,
   2. Liu CY,
   3. Pan PJ, et al

   . Anterior cerebral artery A1 segment hypoplasia may contribute to A1 hypoplasia syndrome. Eur Neurol 2007;57:208–11 doi:10.1159/000099160 pmid:17268201

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Hartkamp NS,
   2. Hendrikse J,
   3. De Cocker LJ, et al

   . Misinterpretation of ischaemic infarct location in relationship to the cerebrovascular territories. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:1084–90 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312906 pmid:27466359

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Puchades-Orts A,
    2. Nombela-Gomez M,
    3. Ortuño-Pacheco G

    . Variation in form of circle of Willis: some anatomical and embryological considerations. Anat Rec 1976;185:119–23 doi:10.1002/ar.1091850112 pmid:1267194

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lazorthes G,
    2. Gouazé A,
    3. Santini JJ, et al

    . Le cercle artériel du cerveau (circulus arteriosus cerebri). Anat Clin 1979;1:241–57 doi:10.1007/BF01654581

    CrossRefWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Riggs HE,
    2. Rupp C

    . Variation in form of circle of Willis: the relation of the variations to collateral circulation— anatomic analysis. Arch Neurol 1963;8:8–14 doi:10.1001/archneur.1963.00460010024002 pmid:13973856

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Eftekhar B,
    2. Dadmehr M,
    3. Ansari S, et al

    . Are the distributions of variations of circle of Willis different in different populations? Results of an anatomical study and review of literature. BMC Neurol 2006;6:22 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-6-22 pmid:16796761

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Jones S,
    2. Tillin T,
    3. Park C, et al

    . Cohort profile update: Southall and Brent revisited (SABRE) study—a UK population-based comparison of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people of European, South Asian and African Caribbean heritage. Int J Epidemiol 2020;49:1441–42e doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa135 pmid:33049759

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Howlett-Smith H, et al

    ; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043033 pmid:15800226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Dimmick SJ,
    2. Faulder KC

    . Normal variants of the cerebral circulation at multidetector CT angiography. Radiographics 2009;29:1027–43 doi:10.1148/rg.294085730 pmid:19605654

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Keuss SE,
    2. Parker TD,
    3. Lane CA, et al

    . Incidental findings on brain imaging and blood tests: results from the first phase of Insight 46, a prospective observational substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029502 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029502 pmid:31371298

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Sunny DE,
    2. Amoo M,
    3. Al Breiki M, et al

    . Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022;164:2751–65 doi:10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7 pmid:35525892

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Thioub M,
    2. Mbaye M,
    3. Thiam AB, et al

    . Microsurgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in Sub-Saharan Africa: a series of 102 consecutive cases treated in Senegal. World Neurosurg 2018;110:226–31 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.048 pmid:29158093

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Mudjir BD,
    2. Quenum K,
    3. Boutarbouch M, et al

    . Les anévrysmes cérébraux ne sont pas rares au Maroc et probablement en Afrique: notre expérience sur une série de 354 cas. Neurochirurgie 2006;52:471 doi:10.1016/S0028-3770(06)71260-7

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Nabaweesi-Batuka J,
    2. Kitunguu PK,
    3. Kiboi JG

    . Pattern of cerebral aneurysms in a Kenyan population as seen at an urban hospital. World Neurosurg 2016;87:255–65 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.061 pmid:26456068

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Ogeng’o JA,
    2. Otieno BO,
    3. Kilonzi J, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms in an African country. Neurol India 2009;57:613–16 doi:10.4103/0028-3886.57816 pmid:19934561

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Ohaegbulam S,
    2. Dujovny M,
    3. Ausman J, et al

    . Ethnic distribution of intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;106:132–35 doi:10.1007/BF01809455 pmid:2284987

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Vlak MH,
    2. Algra A,
    3. Brandenburg R, et al

    . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Imaizumi Y,
    2. Mizutani T,
    3. Shimizu K, et al

    . Detection rates and sites of unruptured intracranial aneurysms according to sex and age: an analysis of MR angiography-based brain examinations of 4070 healthy Japanese adults. J Neurosurg 2018;130:573–78 doi:10.3171/2017.9.JNS171191 pmid:29624149

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Juvela S,
    2. Porras M,
    3. Heiskanen O

    . Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. J Neurosurg 1993;79:174–82 doi:10.3171/jns.1993.79.2.0174 pmid:8331397

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Kapsalaki EZ,
    2. Rountas CD,
    3. Fountas KN

    . The role of 3 Tesla MRA in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Int J Vasc Med 2012;2012:792834 doi:10.1155/2012/792834 pmid:22292121

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Sailer AM,
    2. Wagemans BA,
    3. Nelemans PJ, et al

    . Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2014;45:119–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003133 pmid:24326447

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Li MH,
    2. Li YD,
    3. Gu BX, et al

    . Accurate diagnosis of small cerebral aneurysms ≤5 mm in diameter with 3.0-T MR angiography. Radiology 2014;271:553–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.14122770 pmid:24495263

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Suri MF,
    2. Qiao Y,
    3. Ma X, et al

    . Prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography in the general population: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Stroke 2016;47:1187–93 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011292 pmid:27056984

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Bauer RB,
    2. Sheehan S,
    3. Wechsler N, et al

    . Arteriographic study of sites, incidence, and treatment of arteriosclerotic cerebrovascular lesions. Neurology 1962;12:698 doi:10.1212/WNL.12.10.698

    FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Inzitari D,
    2. Hachinski VC,
    3. Taylor DW, et al

    . Racial differences in the anterior circulation in cerebrovascular disease: how much can be explained by risk factors? Arch Neurol 1990;47:1080–84 doi:10.1001/archneur.1990.00530100042012 pmid:2222239

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Sacco RL,
    2. Kargman DE,
    3. Gu Q, et al

    . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20 doi:10.1161/01.str.26.1.14 pmid:7839388

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Kim JS,
    2. Kim YJ,
    3. Ahn SH, et al

    . Location of cerebral atherosclerosis: why is there a difference between East and West? Int J Stroke 2018;13:35–46 doi:10.1177/1747493016647736 pmid:27145795

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Wityk RJ,
    2. Lehman D,
    3. Klag M, et al

    . Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke 1996;27:1974–80 doi:10.1161/01.str.27.11.1974 pmid:8898801

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Liu M,
    2. Gutierrez J

    . Genetic risk factors of intracranial atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2020;22:13 doi:10.1007/s11883-020-0831-5 pmid:32440785

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. El-Barhoun EN,
    2. Gledhill SR,
    3. Pitman AG

    . Circle of Willis artery diameters on MR angiography: an Australian reference database. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009;53:248–60 doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02056.x pmid:19624291

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Lopez-Bresnahan MV,
    2. Kearse LA Jr.,
    3. Yanez P, et al

    . Anterior communicating artery collateral flow protection against ischemic change during carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 1993;79:379–82 doi:10.3171/jns.1993.79.3.0379 pmid:8360734

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Miralles M,
    2. Dolz JL,
    3. Cotillas J, et al

    . The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion: assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:424–30 doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80164-9 pmid:7489210

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Schomer DF,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Steinberg GK, et al

    . The anatomy of the posterior communicating artery as a risk factor for ischemic cerebral infarction. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1565–70 doi:10.1056/NEJM199406023302204 pmid:8177246

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Lin E,
    2. Kamel H,
    3. Gupta A, et al

    . Incomplete circle of Willis variants and stroke outcome. Eur J Radiol 2022;153:110383 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110383 pmid:35661459

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Sánchez van Kammen M,
    2. Moomaw CJ,
    3. van der Schaaf IC, et al

    . Heritability of circle of Willis variations in families with intracranial aneurysms. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191974 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191974 pmid:29377946

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Stehbens WE

    . Etiology of intracranial berry aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1989;70:823–31 doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.6.0823 pmid:2654334

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. van Overbeeke JJ,
    2. Hillen B,
    3. Tulleken CA

    . A comparative study of the circle of Willis in fetal and adult life. the configuration of the posterior bifurcation of the posterior communicating artery. J Anat 1991;176:45–54 pmid:1917674

    PubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Hoksbergen AW,
    2. Legemate DA,
    3. Csiba L, et al

    . Absent collateral function of the circle of Willis as risk factor for ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16:191–98 doi:10.1159/000071115 pmid:12865604

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Gulli G,
    2. Rutten-Jacobs LC,
    3. Kalra L, et al

    . Differences in the distribution of stroke subtypes in a UK black stroke population: final results from the South London Ethnicity and Stroke Study. BMC Med 2016;14:77 doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0618-2 pmid:27197724

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Sanfilippo R,
    3. Porcu M, et al

    . Relationship between white matter hyperintensities volume and the circle of Willis configurations in patients with carotid artery pathology. Eur J Radiol 2017;89:111–16 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.031 pmid:28267525

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Schmitz BL,
    2. Aschoff AJ,
    3. Hoffmann MH, et al

    . Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–3 pmid:16219827

    PubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Li MH,
    2. Li YD,
    3. Tan HQ, et al

    . Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 2011;77:667–76 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182299f5a pmid:21775735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text