Patient Engagement in Neuroradiology: A Narrative Review and Case Studies

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Higgins T,
   2. Larson E,
   3. Schnall R

   . Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2017;100:30–36 doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002 pmid:27665500

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Detmer D,
   2. Singleton P,
   3. Macleod A, et al

   . The informed patient: study report. 2003
3. 3.↵
   1. Hibbard JH,
   2. Greene J

   . What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:207–14 doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061 pmid:23381511

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Joseph AL,
   2. Kushniruk AW,
   3. Borycki EM

   . Patient journey mapping: current practices, challenges and future opportunities in healthcare. Knowledge Manage e-learning 2020;12:387
5. 5.↵
   1. LaValley SA,
   2. Kiviniemi MT,
   3. Gage-Bouchard EA

   . Where people look for online health information. Health Info Libr J 2017;34:146–55 doi:10.1111/hir.12143 pmid:27207817

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Bange M,
   2. Huh E,
   3. Novin SA, et al

   . Readability of patient education materials from RadiologyInfo.org: has there been progress over the past 5 years? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;213:875–79 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.21047 pmid:31386570

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Novin SA,
   2. Huh EH,
   3. Bange MG, et al

   . Readability of Spanish-language patient education materials from RadiologyInfo.org. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:1108–13 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.036 pmid:30956087

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Zygmont ME,
   2. Ikuta I,
   3. Nguyen XV, et al

   . Clinical decision support: impact on appropriate imaging utilization. Acad Radiol 2023;30:1433–40 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.006 pmid:36336523

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Montori VM,
   2. Brito JP,
   3. Murad MH

   . The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA 2013;310:2503–04 doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281422 pmid:24165826

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Is lung cancer screening right for me? https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/lung-cancer-screening-decision-aid.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2023
11. 11.↵
    1. Victoor A,
    2. Delnoij DM,
    3. Friele RD, et al

    . Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:272 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-272 pmid:22913549

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    Medicare. Care compare. https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/. Accessed June 25, 2023
13. 13.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital price transparency. https://www.cms.gov/hospital-price-transparency#:∼:text=Starting%20January%201%2C%202021%2C%20each,with%20all%20items%20and%20services. Accessed July 11, 2023
14. 14.↵
    1. Sadigh G,
    2. Carlos RC

    . Price transparency in radiology: challenges and opportunities to improve. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;217:1243–44 doi:10.2214/AJR.21.25976 pmid:34009001

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Manik R,
    2. Carlos RC,
    3. Duszak R Jr., et al

    . Costs versus quality in imaging examination decisions. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19:450–59 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.11.015 pmid:35122720

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Dusheiko M,
    2. Gravelle H

    . Choosing and booking and attending? Impact of an electronic booking system on outpatient referrals and non-attendances. Health Econ 2018;27:357–71 doi:10.1002/hec.3552 pmid:28776868

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Kruuse-Jensen K,
    2. Madsen KS,
    3. Bruun DM, et al

    . Do outpatients with cancer and their relatives want to use an online booking system to book the appointment and radiographer for their CT examination? A small-scale study in Denmark. Radiography (Lond) 2022;28:174–79 doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.10.005 pmid:34702667

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Itri JN

    . Patient-centered radiology. Radiographics 2015;35:1835–46 doi:10.1148/rg.2015150110 pmid:26466190

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Hamilton-Basich M

    . openDoctor to deliver radiology digital front door experience. AXIS Imaging News. March 9, 2021.
20. 20.↵
    1. Towbin AJ,
    2. O’Connor T,
    3. Perry LA, et al

    . Using informatics to engage patients. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50:1514–24 doi:10.1007/s00247-020-04767-1 pmid:32935243

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ganeshan S,
    2. Pierce L,
    3. Mourad M, et al

    . Impact of patient portal-based self-scheduling of diagnostic imaging studies on health disparities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022;29:2096–100 doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac152 pmid:36063414

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Wahab SA,
    2. Wahab RA,
    3. Butcher B, et al

    . Humanizing radiology appointment education to improve patient experience. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19:647–51 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.12.007 pmid:35331690

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Ginat DT,
    2. Christoforidis G

    . A printed information leaflet about MRI and radiologists improves neuroradiology patient health literacy. Neuroradiol J 2018;31:609–13 doi:10.1177/1971400918788361 pmid:29999453

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ashmore J,
    2. Di Pietro J,
    3. Williams K, et al

    . A free virtual reality experience to prepare pediatric patients for magnetic resonance imaging: cross-sectional questionnaire study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2019;2:e11684 doi:10.2196/11684

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Harper C,
    2. Jefferies S,
    3. Crosser A, et al

    . Exploring hospital wayfinding systems: touchscreen kiosks, apps and environmental cues. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 172–175), 2019. Los Angeles: SAGE doi:10.1177/2327857919081042
26. 26.↵
    RadNet. Virtual Check-iN. https://www.radnet.com/community-radiology/remote-check-in. Accessed July 11, 2023
27. 27.↵
    1. Vincoff NS,
    2. Barish MA,
    3. Grimaldi G

    . The patient-friendly radiology report: history, evolution, challenges and opportunities. Clin Imaging 2022;89:128–35 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.06.018 pmid:35803159

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Bankier AA,
    2. O’Donnell CR,
    3. Boiselle PM

    . Quality initiatives. Respiratory instructions for CT examinations of the lungs: a hands-on guide. Radiographics 2008;28:919–31 doi:10.1148/rg.284085035 pmid:18635620

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Lang EV

    . Managing distress, discomfort, and anxiety in imaging. Radiol Manage 2011;33:55–58 pmid:21870690

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Niehoff JH,
    2. Heuser A,
    3. Michael AE, et al

    . Patient comfort in modern computed tomography: what really counts. Tomography 2022;8:1401–12 doi:10.3390/tomography8030113 pmid:35645399

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Oztek MA,
    2. Brunnquell CL,
    3. Hoff MN, et al

    . Practical considerations for radiologists in implementing a patient-friendly MRI experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2020;29:181–86 doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000247 pmid:32511199

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Pahade J,
    2. Couto C,
    3. Davis RB, et al

    . Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:844–51 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.8064 pmid:22997377

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Mohan SK,
    2. Hudgins PA,
    3. Patel MR, et al

    . Making time for patients: positive impact of direct patient reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:W12–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18327 pmid:29220209

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Grimm LJ,
    2. Fish LJ,
    3. Carrico CW, et al

    . Radiology stereotypes, application barriers, and hospital integration: a mixed-methods study of medical student perceptions of radiology. Acad Radiol 2022;29:1108–15 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.020 pmid:34563441

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Gutzeit A,
    2. Sartoretti E,
    3. Reisinger C, et al

    . Direct communication between radiologists and patients improves the quality of imaging reports. Eur Radiol 2021;31:8725–32 doi:10.1007/s00330-021-07933-7 pmid:33909134

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Rockall AG,
    2. Justich C,
    3. Helbich T, et al

    . Patient communication in radiology: moving up the agenda. Eur J Radiol 2022;155:110464 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110464 pmid:36038410

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Harvey JA,
    2. Cohen MA,
    3. Brenin DR, et al

    . Breaking bad news: a primer for radiologists in breast imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:800–08 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.06.009 pmid:17964502

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    American College of Radiology. Communication curriculum. https://www.acr.org/Member-Resources/rfs/learning/Communication-for-Radiology-Residents. Accessed July 12, 2023
39. 39.↵
    1. Brown SD,
    2. Rider EA,
    3. Jamieson K, et al

    . Development of a standardized Kalamazoo communication skills assessment tool for radiologists: validation, multisource reliability, and lessons learned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209:351–57 doi:10.2214/AJR.16.17439 pmid:28537754

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Koney N,
    2. Roudenko A,
    3. Ro M, et al

    . Patients want to meet with imaging experts. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:465–70 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.11.011 pmid:26857485

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Potter T,
    2. Schaefer TJ

    . Hypertensive Encephalopathy. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554499. Accessed July 12, 2023
42. 42.↵
    1. Howard L,
    2. Wessely S,
    3. Leese M, et al

    . Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1558–64 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.057851 pmid:16227551

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Hoang JK

    . Avoid jargon terms for normal. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:546 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.018 pmid:26047396

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Mishra VK,
    2. Hoyt RE,
    3. Wolver SE, et al

    . Qualitative and quantitative analysis of patients’ perceptions of the patient portal experience with OpenNotes. Appl Clin Inform 2019;10:10–18 doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676588 pmid:30602196

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    American College of Radiology Data Science Institute. Patient Friendly Report Summary. https://www.acrdsi.org/DSI-Services/Define-AI/Use-Cases/Automated-Patient-Friendly-Report-Summary. Accessed June 24, 2023
46. 46.↵
    1. Lyu Q,
    2. Tan J,
    3. Zapadka ME, et al

    . Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art 2023;6:9 doi:10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5 pmid:37198498

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Folio LR,
    2. Machado LB,
    3. Dwyer AJ

    . Multimedia-enhanced radiology reports: concept, components, and challenges. Radiographics 2018;38:462–82 doi:10.1148/rg.2017170047 pmid:29528822

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Mangano MD,
    2. Rahman A,
    3. Choy G, et al

    . Radiologists’ role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:1034–39 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12470 pmid:25341142

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Kemp J,
    2. Gannuch G,
    3. Kornbluth C, et al

    . Radiologists include contact telephone number in reports: experience with patient interaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215:673–78 doi:10.2214/AJR.19.22713 pmid:32755165

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Panagides JC,
    2. Achuck E,
    3. Daye D

    . Synchronous virtual patient consultations in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;219:164–65 doi:10.2214/AJR.21.27270 pmid:35080459

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Kadom N,
    2. Tamasi S,
    3. Vey BL, et al

    . Info-RADS: adding a message for patients in radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 2021;18:128–32 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.049 pmid:33068534

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Smith B,
    2. Magnani JW

    . New technologies, new disparities: the intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy. Int J Cardiol 2019;292:280–82 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.066 pmid:31171391

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Mabotuwana T,
    2. Hall CS,
    3. Hombal V, et al

    . Automated tracking of follow-up imaging recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212:1287–94 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20586 pmid:30860895

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Mannix J,
    2. LaVoye J,
    3. Wasserman M, et al

    . Notification system for overdue radiology recommendations improves rates of follow-up and diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;217:515–20 doi:10.2214/AJR.20.23173 pmid:34076452

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Mattay GS,
    2. Mittl GS,
    3. Zafar HM, et al

    . Early impact of Pennsylvania Act 112 on follow-up of abnormal imaging findings. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:1676–83 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.014 pmid:32579883

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Loftus R,
    2. Kadom N,
    3. Wandtke B

    . Impact of early direct patient notification on follow-up completion for non-urgent actionable incidental radiology findings. J Am Coll Radiol 2023 Oct 9:S1546–1440(23)00758–55