Perspectives on Remote Robotic-Assisted Stroke Treatment: A Commentary Paper

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Beaman CB,
   2. Kaneko N,
   3. Meyers PM, et al

   . A review of robotic interventional neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:808–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6976 pmid:33541906

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Crinnion W,
   2. Jackson B,
   3. Sood A, et al

   . Robotics in neurointerventional surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:539–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018096 pmid:34799439

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Britz GW,
   2. Panesar SS,
   3. Falb P, et al

   . Neuroendovascular-specific engineering modifications to the CorPath GRX Robotic System. J Neurosurg 2019;133:1830–36 doi:10.3171/2019.9.JNS192113 pmid:31783367

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Mendes Pereira V,
   2. Nicholson P,
   3. Cancelliere NM, et al

   . Feasibility of robot-assisted neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurosurg 2021;136:992–1004 doi:10.3171/2021.1.JNS203617 pmid:34560642

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Mendes Pereira V,
   2. Cancelliere NM,
   3. Nicholson P, et al

   . First-in-human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:338–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015671.rep pmid:32132138

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Sutherland GR,
   3. Lama S, et al

   . Neurointerventional robotics: challenges and opportunities. Clin Neuroradiol 2020;30:203–08 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00913-2 pmid:32607626

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Panesar SS,
   2. Volpi JJ,
   3. Lumsden A, et al

   . Telerobotic stroke intervention: a novel solution to the care dissemination dilemma. J Neurosurg 2019;132:971–78 doi:10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739 pmid:31783366

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Miyachi S,
   2. Nagano Y,
   3. Kawaguchi R, et al

   . Remote surgery using a neuroendovascular intervention support robot equipped with a sensing function: experimental verification. Asian J Neurosurg 2021;16:363–66 doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_77_21 pmid:34268165

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Adeoye O,
   2. Albright KC,
   3. Carr BG, et al

   . Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States. Stroke 2014;45:3019–24 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006293 pmid:25158773

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Bulwa Z,
    2. Chen M

    . Stroke center designations, neurointerventionalist demand, and the finances of stroke thrombectomy in the United States. Neurology 2021;97:S17–24 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012780 pmid:34785600

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Aguiar de Sousa D,
    2. von Martial R,
    3. Abilleira S, et al

    . Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: a survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries. Eur Stroke J 2019;4:13–28 doi:10.1177/2396987318786023 pmid:31165091

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Garcia-Tornel A,
    2. Millan M,
    3. Rubiera M, et al

    ; RACECAT Trial Investigators. Workflows and outcomes in patients with suspected large vessel occlusion stroke triaged in urban and nonurban areas. Stroke 2022;53:3728–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040768 pmid:36259411

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cancelliere NM,
    2. Lynch J,
    3. Nicholson P, et al

    . Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1 year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:1229–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017865 pmid:34911735

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Patel TM,
    2. Shah SC,
    3. Pancholy SB

    . Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 2019;14:53–58 doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.017 pmid:31709402

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Tian W,
    2. Fan M,
    3. Zeng C, et al

    . Telerobotic spinal surgery based on 5G network: the first 12 cases. Neurospine 2020;17:114–20 doi:10.14245/ns.1938454.227 pmid:32252160

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Legeza P,
    2. Britz GW,
    3. Shah A, et al

    . Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model. J Robot Surg 2022;16:29–35 doi:10.1007/s11701-021-01196-6 pmid:33550514

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Madder RD,
    2. VanOosterhout S,
    3. Mulder A, et al

    . Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;95:914–19 doi:10.1002/ccd.28425 pmid:31410958

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Dusenbury W,
    2. Mathiesen C,
    3. Whaley M, et al

    ; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing and the Stroke Council. Ideal foundational requirements for stroke program development and growth: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2023;54:e175–87 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000424 pmid:36748462

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Yamaki VN,
    2. Cancelliere NM,
    3. Nicholson P, et al

    . Biomodex patient-specific brain aneurysm models: the value of simulation for first in-human experiences using new devices and robotics. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:272–77 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015990 pmid:32601259

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Day AL,
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Meyers PM, et al

    . Training standards in neuroendovascular surgery: program accreditation and practitioner certification. Stroke 2017;48:2318–25 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016560 pmid:28706116

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Sanmartin MX,
    2. Katz JM,
    3. Eusemann C, et al

    . Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg 2023;139:721–31 doi:10.3171/2022.12.JNS222115 pmid:36670531

    CrossRefPubMed