Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping with Source Separation in Normal Brain Development of Newborns

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Volpe JJ,
   2. Inder TE,
   3. Darras BT, et al

   . Volpe’s Neurology of the Newborn E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017
2. 2.↵
   1. Brody BA,
   2. Kinney HC,
   3. Kloman AS, et al

   . Sequence of central nervous system myelination in human infancy, I: An autopsy study of myelination. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1987;46:283–301 doi:10.1097/00005072-198705000-00005 pmid:3559630

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hasegawa M,
   2. Houdou S,
   3. Mito T, et al

   . Development of myelination in the human fetal and infant cerebrum: a myelin basic protein immunohistochemical study. Brain and Development 1992;14:1–6 doi:10.1016/S0387-7604(12)80271-3 pmid:1375444

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Barkovich A,
   2. Kjos B,
   3. Jackson Jr D, et al

   . Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988;166:173–80 doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336675 pmid:3336675

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Counsell SJ,
   2. Maalouf EF,
   3. Fletcher AM, et al

   . MR imaging assessment of myelination in the very preterm brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:872–81 pmid:12006296

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Kinney HC,
   2. Brody BA,
   3. Kloman AS, et al

   . Sequence of central nervous system myelination in human infancy, II: Patterns of myelination in autopsied infants. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1988;47:217–34 doi:10.1097/00005072-198805000-00003 pmid:3367155

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Lebel C,
   2. Gee M,
   3. Camicioli R, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. Neuroimage 2012;60:340–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.094 pmid:22178809

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Deoni SC,
   2. Mercure E,
   3. Blasi A, et al

   . Mapping infant brain myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2011;31:784–91 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2106-10.2011 pmid:21228187

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Nossin-Manor R,
   2. Card D,
   3. Morris D, et al

   . Quantitative MRI in the very preterm brain: assessing tissue organization and myelination using magnetization transfer, diffusion tensor and T₁ imaging. Neuroimage 2013;64:505–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.086 pmid:22982360

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Bilgic B,
    2. Costagli M,
    3. Chan K‐S, et al

    ; QSM Consensus Organization Committee. Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: a consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group. Magn Reson Med 2024;91:1834–62 doi:10.1002/mrm.30006 pmid:38247051

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Argyridis I,
    2. Li W,
    3. Johnson GA, et al

    . Quantitative magnetic susceptibility of the developing mouse brain reveals microstructural changes in the white matter. Neuroimage 2014;88:134–42 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.026 pmid:24269576

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Beaulieu C

    . The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system: a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:435–55 doi:10.1002/nbm.782 pmid:12489094

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Ning N,
    2. Liu C,
    3. Wu P, et al

    . Spatiotemporal variations of magnetic susceptibility in the deep gray matter nuclei from 1 month to 6 years: a quantitative susceptibility mapping study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:1600–09 doi:10.1002/jmri.26579 pmid:30569483

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Shi J,
    3. Wei H, et al

    . Neonate and infant brain development from birth to 2 years assessed using MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2019;185:349–60 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.031 pmid:30315906

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Otani S,
    2. Fushimi Y,
    3. Iwanaga K, et al

    . Evaluation of deep gray matter for early brain development using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Eur Radiol 2023;33:4488–99 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-09267-4 pmid:36418626

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Dimov AV,
    2. Nguyen TD,
    3. Gillen KM, et al

    . Susceptibility source separation from gradient echo data using magnitude decay modeling. J Neuroimaging 2022;32:852–59 doi:10.1111/jon.13014 pmid:35668022

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Dimov AV,
    2. Gillen KM,
    3. Nguyen TD, et al

    . Magnetic susceptibility source separation solely from gradient echo data: histological validation. Tomography 2022;8:1544–51 doi:10.3390/tomography8030127 pmid:35736875

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Shin HG,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Yun YH, et al

    . χ-separation: magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain. Neuroimage 2021;240:118371 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118371 pmid:34242783

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Gong NJ,
    3. Chaim KT, et al

    . Decompose quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to sub-voxel diamagnetic and paramagnetic components based on gradient-echo MRI data. Neuroimage 2021;242:118477 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118477 pmid:34403742

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Emmerich J,
    2. Bachert P,
    3. Ladd ME, et al

    . On the separation of susceptibility sources in quantitative susceptibility mapping: theory and phantom validation with an in vivo application to multiple sclerosis lesions of different age. J Magn Reson 2021;330:107033 doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107033 pmid:34303117

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Wu D,
    2. Chang L,
    3. Akazawa K, et al

    . Mapping the critical gestational age at birth that alters brain development in preterm-born infants using multi-modal MRI. Neuroimage 2017;149:33–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.046

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Deistung A,
    3. Lehr BW, et al

    . Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011;54:2789–807 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.070 pmid:21040794

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Wu B,
    3. Liu C

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011;55:1645–56 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.088 pmid:21224002

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Wisnieff C,
    3. Lou M, et al

    . Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:467–76 doi:10.1002/mrm.24272 pmid:22488774

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Liu T

    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:82–101 doi:10.1002/mrm.25358

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison N,
    3. Song G

    . Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2009;2:1–35
28. 28.↵
    1. Makropoulos A,
    2. Gousias IS,
    3. Ledig C, et al

    . Automatic whole brain MRI segmentation of the developing neonatal brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014;33:1818–31 doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2322280 pmid:24816548

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Serag A,
    2. Aljabar P,
    3. Ball G, et al

    . Construction of a consistent high-definition spatio-temporal atlas of the developing brain using adaptive kernel regression. Neuroimage 2012;59:2255–65 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.062

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Brant-Zawadzki M,
    2. Enzmann DR

    . Using computed tomography of the brain to correlate low white-matter attenuation with early gestational age in neonates. Radiology 1981;139:105–08 doi:10.1148/radiology.139.1.7208910 pmid:7208910

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Siegel GJ

    1. Norton W

    . Formation, structure and biochemistry of myelin. In: Siegel GJ. Basic Neurochemistry. Little, Brown; 1976
32. 32.↵
    1. Williams LA,
    2. Gelman N,
    3. Picot PA, et al

    . Neonatal brain: regional variability of in vivo MR imaging relaxation rates at 3.0 T–initial experience. Radiology 2005;235:595–603 doi:10.1148/radiol.2352031769 pmid:15858099

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Cheng NY,
    3. House MJ, et al

    . Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:1–25 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2004.10.001 pmid:15733784

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Cheepsunthorn P,
    2. Palmer C,
    3. Connor JR

    . Cellular distribution of ferritin subunits in postnatal rat brain. J Comp Neurol 1998;400:73–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Connor J,
    2. Menzies S

    . Altered cellular distribution of iron in the central nervous system of myelin deficient rats. Neuroscience 1990;34:265–71 doi:10.1016/0306-4522(90)90320-4 pmid:2325851

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Hallgren B,
    2. Sourander P

    . The effect of age on the non‐haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem 1958;3:41–51 doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1958.tb12607.x pmid:13611557

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Eun H,
    2. Jeong H,
    3. Lee J, et al

    . A geometric approach to separate the effects of magnetic susceptibility and chemical shift/exchange in a phantom with isotropic magnetic susceptibility. Magn Reson Med 2021;85:281–89 doi:10.1002/mrm.28408 pmid:32643239

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Luo J,
    2. He X,
    3. d’Avignon DA, et al

    . Protein-induced water 1H MR frequency shifts: contributions from magnetic susceptibility and exchange effects. J Magn Reson 2010;202:102–08 doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2009.10.005 pmid:19879785

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Shmueli K,
    2. Dodd SJ,
    3. Li TQ, et al

    . The contribution of chemical exchange to MRI frequency shifts in brain tissue. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:35–43 doi:10.1002/mrm.22604 pmid:20928888

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Zhong K,
    2. Leupold J,
    3. von Elverfeldt D, et al

    . The molecular basis for gray and white matter contrast in phase imaging. Neuroimage 2008;40:1561–66 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.061 pmid:18353683

    CrossRefPubMed