European Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of a Dual-Layer Flow-Diverting Stent for Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: The European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Leone G,
   4. Cirillo L, et al

   . Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E3 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1732 pmid:28565988

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   Pivotal Study of the FRED Stent System in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01801007?term=FRED&cond=Aneurysm&rank=1. Accessed December 18, 2017
4. 4.↵
   2. Luecking H,
   3. Engelhorn T,
   4. Lang S, et al

   . FRED flow diverter: a study on safety and efficacy in a consecutive group of 50 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5052 pmid:28104636

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Möhlenbruch MA,
   3. Herweh C,
   4. Jestaedt L, et al

   . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4251 pmid:25721079

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Drescher F,
   3. Weber W,
   4. Berlis A, et al

   . Treatment of intra- and extracranial aneurysms using the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device: multicenter experience and follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:105–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4964 pmid:27811135

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. O'Kelly CJ,
   3. Krings T,
   4. Fiorella D, et al

   . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Griessenauer CJ,
   3. Gupta R,
   4. Shi S, et al

   . Collar sign in incompletely occluded aneurysms after Pipeline embolization: evaluation with angiography and optical coherence tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:323–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5010 pmid:28056454

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Fargen KM,
   3. Soriano-Baron HE,
   4. Rushing JT, et al

   . A survey of intracranial aneurysm treatment practices among United States physicians. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:44–49 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012808 pmid:28184003

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Dabus G,
    3. Grossberg JA,
    4. Cawley CM, et al

    . Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with Pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:147–51 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012519 pmid:27382125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Bhogal P,
    3. Martinez R,
    4. Gansladt O, et al

    . Management of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the M1 segment with flow diversion: a single centre experience. Clin Neuroradiol 2016 Dec 11. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0553-9 pmid:27942770

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lopes DK,
    3. Jang DK,
    4. Cekirge S, et al

    . Morbidity and mortality in patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device: a subgroup analysis of the international retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2017 Sep 18. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx467 pmid:28945879

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft HJ,
    4. Kallmes DF

    . Difficult aneurysms for endovascular treatment: overwide or undertall? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1513–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1633 pmid:19461057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Daou B,
    4. Barros G, et al

    . Matched comparison of flow diversion and coiling in small, noncomplex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2017;81:92–97 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw070 pmid:28402491

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Walcott BP,
    3. Koch MJ,
    4. Stapleton CJ, et al

    . Blood flow diversion as a primary treatment method for ruptured brain aneurysms: concerns, controversy, and future directions. Neurocrit Care 2017;26:465–73 doi:10.1007/s12028-016-0318-y pmid:27844465

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Potts MB,
    4. Shapiro M, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2017;127:81–88 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 pmid:27739944

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Cekirge S, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg 2017;127:775–80 doi:10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467 pmid:27791519

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Adeeb N,
    3. Moore JM,
    4. Wirtz M, et al

    . Predictors of incomplete occlusion following Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms: is it less effective in older patients? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2295–2300 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5375 pmid:28912285

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Boccardi E, et al

    . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text