3D Deep Learning Angiography (3D-DLA) from C-arm Conebeam CT

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Go AS,
   3. Mozaffarian D,
   4. Roger VL, et al

   ; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;127:143–52 doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318282ab8f pmid:23283859

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Wiebers DO

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Mohr JP,
   3. Parides MK,
   4. Stapf C, et al

   ; international ARUBA investigators. Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet 2014;383:614–21 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62302-8 pmid:24268105

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Ogilvy CS,
   3. Stieg PE,
   4. Awad I, et al

   ; Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association. AHA scientific statement: recommendations for the management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association. Stroke 2001;32:1458–71 doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1458 pmid:11387517

   FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Hacein-Bey L,
   3. Provenzale JM

   . Current imaging assessment and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:32–44 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5329 pmid:21178044

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Anxionnat R,
   3. Bracard S,
   4. Ducrocq X, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799–808 doi:10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr09799 pmid:11230659

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Gandhi D,
   3. Chen J,
   4. Pearl M, et al

   . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: classification, imaging findings, and treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1007–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2798 pmid:22241393

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Fahrig R,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. Lownie S, et al

   . Use of a C-arm system to generate true three-dimensional computed rotational angiograms: preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1507–14 pmid:9296192

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   1. Reiser MF,
   2. Becker CR,
   3. Nikolaou K, et al.

   2. Strobel N,
   3. Meissner O,
   4. Boese J, et al

   . 3D imaging with flat-detector C-arm systems. In: Reiser MF, Becker CR, Nikolaou K, et al., eds. Multislice CT. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009:33–51
10. 10.↵
    2. Erickson BJ,
    3. Korfiatis P,
    4. Akkus Z, et al

    . Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 2017;37:505–15 doi:10.1148/rg.2017160130 pmid:28212054

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Chan HP,
    3. Lo SC,
    4. Sahiner B, et al

    . Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. Med Phys 1995;22:1555–67 doi:10.1118/1.597428 pmid:8551980

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Giger ML, et al

    . Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys 1992;19:555–60 doi:10.1118/1.596845 pmid:1508089

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Giger ML, et al

    . Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys 1994;21:517–24 doi:10.1118/1.597177 pmid:8058017

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Wang S,
    3. Summers RM

    . Machine learning and radiology. Med Image Anal 2012;16:933–51 doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.02.005 pmid:22465077

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. LeCun Y,
    3. Bengio Y,
    4. Hinton G

    . Deep learning. Nature 2015;521:436–44 doi:10.1038/nature14539 pmid:26017442

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Gulshan V,
    3. Peng L,
    4. Coram M, et al

    . Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 2016;316:2402–10 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 pmid:27898976

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Huynh BQ,
    3. Li H,
    4. Giger ML

    . Digital mammographic tumor classification using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2016;3:034501 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.034501 pmid:27610399

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Antropova N,
    3. Huynh BQ,
    4. Giger ML

    . A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets. Med Phys 2017;44:5162–71 doi:10.1002/mp.12453 pmid:28681390

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Akkus Z,
    3. Galimzianova A,
    4. Hoogi A, et al

    . Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Dig Imaging 2017;30:449–59 doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 pmid:28577131

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Korfiatis P,
    3. Kline TL,
    4. Lachance DH, et al

    . Residual deep convolutional neural network predicts MGMT methylation status. J Dig Imaging 2017;30:622–28 doi:10.1007/s10278-017-0009-z pmid:28785873

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Nakao T,
    3. Hanaoka S,
    4. Nomura Y, et al

    . Deep neural network-based computer-assisted detection of cerebral aneurysms in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017 Aug 24. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/jmri.25842 pmid:28836310

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Wang X,
    3. Peng Y,
    4. Lu L, et al

    . ChestX-ray8: hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, Hawaii. July 21–26, 2017
23. 23.↵
    2. Lakhani P,
    3. Sundaram B

    . Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 2017;284:574–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162326 pmid:28436741

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Cybenko G

    . Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems 1989;2:303–14 doi:10.1007/BF02551274

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    2. Hornik K

    . Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks 1991;4:251–57 doi:10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T

    CrossRefWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Hauer M,
    4. Banckwitz R, et al

    . Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1257–65 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3136-7 pmid:24691631

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Lang S,
    3. Gölitz P,
    4. Struffert T, et al

    . 4D DSA for dynamic visualization of cerebral vasculature: a single-center experience in 26 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1169–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5161 pmid:28408632

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Shapiro LG

    . Connected component labeling and adjacency graph construction. Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition 1996;19:1–30
29. 29.↵
    2. He H,
    3. Garcia EA

    . Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2009;21:1263–84
30. 30.↵
    1. David ST

    2. LeCun Y,
    3. Boser BE,
    4. Denker JS, et al

    . Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In: David ST, ed. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers;1990:396–404
31. 31.↵
    1. Leibe B,
    2. Matas J,
    3. Sebe N, et al.

    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, et al., eds. Proceedings of Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. October 1–14, 2016
32. 32.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, Washington. June 27–30, 2016:770–78
33. 33.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Los Alamitos, California. December 7–13, 2015:1026–34
34. 34.↵
    2. Silver D,
    3. Huang A,
    4. Maddison CJ, et al

    . Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016;529:484–89 doi:10.1038/nature16961 pmid:26819042

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Silver D,
    3. Schrittwieser J,
    4. Simonyan K, et al

    . Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 2017;550:354–59 doi:10.1038/nature24270 pmid:29052630

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Shin HC,
    3. Roth HR,
    4. Gao M, et al

    . Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1285–98 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162 pmid:26886976

    CrossRefPubMed