Contrast-Enhanced CISS Imaging for Evaluation of Neurovascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Improved Correlation with Symptoms and Prediction of Surgical Outcomes

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Devor M,
   3. Amir R,
   4. Rappaport ZH

   . Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain 2002;18:4–13 doi:10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002 pmid:11803297

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Peker S,
   3. Dinçer A,
   4. Necmettin Pamir M

   . Vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve is a frequent finding in asymptomatic individuals: 3-T MR imaging of 200 trigeminal nerves using 3D CISS sequences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:1081–88 doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0329-y pmid:19415176

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Miller JP,
   3. Acar F,
   4. Hamilton BE, et al

   . Radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neurovascular compression in patients with and without trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2009;110:627–32 doi:10.3171/2008.6.17620 pmid:19338397

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Hamlyn PJ

   . Neurovascular relationships in the posterior cranial fossa, with special reference to trigeminal neuralgia, 2: neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve in cadaveric controls and patients with trigeminal neuralgia—quantification and influence of method. Clin Anat 1997;10:380–88 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:6<380::AID-CA2>3.0.CO%3B2-T pmid:9358968

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Adams CB

   . Microvascular compression: an alternative view and hypothesis. J Neurosurg 1989;70:1–12 doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0001 pmid:2642544

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Maarbjerg S,
   3. Wolfram F,
   4. Gozalov A, et al

   . Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Brain 2015;138:311–19 doi:10.1093/brain/awu349 pmid:25541189

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Antonini G,
   3. Di Pasquale A,
   4. Cruccu G, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging contribution for diagnosing symptomatic neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a blinded case-control study and meta-analysis. Pain 2014;155:1464–71 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.020 pmid:24785270

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Sindou M,
   3. Leston J,
   4. Decullier E, et al

   . Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1144–53 doi:10.3171/JNS-07/12/1144 pmid:18077952

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Sarsam Z,
   3. Garcia-Fiñana M,
   4. Nurmikko TJ, et al

   . The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:18–25, 2010 doi:10.3109/02688690903370289 pmid:20158348

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Szapiro J Jr.,
    3. Sindou M,
    4. Szapiro J

    . Prognostic factors in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 1985;17:920–29 doi:10.1227/00006123-198512000-00009 pmid:4080125

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Leal PR,
    3. Barbier C,
    4. Hermier M, et al

    . Atrophic changes in the trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia due to neurovascular compression and their association with the severity of compression and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1484–95 doi:10.3171/2014.2.JNS131288 pmid:24745706

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Han-Bing S,
    3. Wei-Guo Z,
    4. Jun Z, et al

    . Predicting the outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia using magnetic resonance tomographic angiography. J Neuroimaging 2010;20:345–49 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00378.x pmid:19490372

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Duan Y,
    3. Sweet J,
    4. Munyon C, et al

    . Degree of distal trigeminal nerve atrophy predicts outcome after microvascular decompression for type 1a trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1512–18 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS142086 pmid:26186027

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Zakrzewska JM,
    3. Coakham HB

    . Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: update. Curr Opin Neurol 2012;25:296–301 doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328352c465 pmid:22547101

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Casselman JW,
    3. Kuhweide R,
    4. Deimling M, et al

    . Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:47–57 pmid:8427111

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Blitz AM,
    3. Macedo LL,
    4. Chonka ZD, et al

    . High-resolution CISS MR imaging with and without contrast for evaluation of the upper cranial nerves: segmental anatomy and selected pathologic conditions of the cisternal through extraforaminal segments. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:17–34 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.021 pmid:24210310

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Chavhan GB,
    3. Babyn PS,
    4. Jankharia BG, et al

    . Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008;28:1147–60 doi:10.1148/rg.284075031 pmid:18635634

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Shigematsu Y,
    3. Korogi Y,
    4. Hirai T, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:224–31 doi:10.1097/00004728-199903000-00010 pmid:10096329

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Blitz AM,
    3. Choudhri AF,
    4. Chonka ZD, et al

    . Anatomic considerations, nomenclature, and advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques for visualization of the cranial nerve segments by MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:1–15 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.020 pmid:24210309

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Amemiya S,
    3. Aoki S,
    4. Ohtomo K

    . Cranial nerve assessment in cavernous sinus tumors with contrast-enhanced 3D fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2009;51:467–70 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0513-z pmid:19238368

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Greenland S,
    3. Thomas DC

    . On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982;116:547–53 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113439 pmid:7124721

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Noordzij M,
    3. Tripepi G,
    4. Dekker FW, et al

    . Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2010;25:1388–93 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp732 pmid:20067907

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. DeLong ER,
    3. DeLong DM,
    4. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Beaver DL

    . Electron microscopy of the gasserian ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1967;26(Suppl):138–50 doi:10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0138 pmid:4163663

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Yousry I,
    3. Moriggl B,
    4. Holtmannspoetter M, et al

    . Detailed anatomy of the motor and sensory roots of the trigeminal nerve and their neurovascular relationships: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:427–34 doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0427 pmid:15352600

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Leal PR,
    3. Hermier M,
    4. Souza MA, et al

    . Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2011;69:15–25; discussion 26 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bafa pmid:21346659

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Zhou Q,
    3. Liu ZL,
    4. Qu CC, et al

    . Preoperative demonstration of neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia by using 3D FIESTA sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:666–71 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.022 pmid:22405984

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Gudmundsson K,
    3. Rhoton AL Jr.,
    4. Rushton JG

    . Detailed anatomy of the intracranial portion of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurosurg 1971;35:592–600 doi:10.3171/jns.1971.35.5.0592 pmid:5120007

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Tanriover N,
    3. Abe H,
    4. Rhoton AL Jr., et al

    . Microsurgical anatomy of the superior petrosal venous complex: new classifications and implications for subtemporal transtentorial and retrosigmoid suprameatal approaches. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1041–50 doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1041 pmid:17564177

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Matsushima T,
    3. Huynh-Le P,
    4. Miyazono M

    . Trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression. Neurosurgery 2004;55:334–37; discussion 338–39 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000129552.87291.87 pmid:15271239

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Levy EI,
    4. Scarrow AM, et al

    . Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia attributable to veins after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 2000;46:356–61; discussion 361–62 doi:10.1097/00006123-200002000-00019 pmid:10690724

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Hong W,
    3. Zheng X,
    4. Wu Z, et al

    . Clinical features and surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused solely by venous compression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1037–42 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-0957-x pmid:21298451

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Yousry I,
    3. Moriggl B,
    4. Schmid UD, et al

    . Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1128–35 pmid:15891171

    Abstract/FREE Full Text