Reasons for Reperfusion Failures in Stent-Retriever-Based Thrombectomy: Registry Analysis and Proposal of a Classification System

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Menon BK,
   4. Van Zwam WH, et al

   ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Manning NW,
   3. Chapot R,
   4. Meyers PM

   . Endovascular stroke management: key elements of success. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:170–77 doi:10.1159/000445449 pmid:27111086

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Leslie-Mazwi T,
   3. Chandra RV,
   4. Fraser JF, et al

   . AHA/ASA 2018 AIS guidelines: impact and opportunity for endovascular stroke care. J Neurointerv Surg 2018 May 28. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013911 pmid:29807886

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Powers WJ,
   3. Rabinstein AA,
   4. Ackerson T, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2018;49:e46–110 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158 pmid:29367334

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Turk AS,
   3. Siddiqui AH,
   4. Mocco J

   . A comparison of direct aspiration versus stent retriever as a first approach (‘COMPASS’): protocol. J Neurointerv Surg 2018 Feb 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013722 pmid:29463619

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Froehler MT,
   3. Saver JL,
   4. Zaidat OO, et al

   ; on behalf of the STRATIS Investigators. Interhospital transfer prior to thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS Registry. Circulation 2017;136:2311–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Zaidat OO,
   3. Castonguay AC,
   4. Nogueira RG, et al

   . TREVO stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion registry. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:516–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013328 pmid:28963367

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Yoo AJ,
   3. Andersson T

   . Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: challenges to procedural success. J Stroke 2017;19:121–30 doi:10.5853/jos.2017.00752 pmid:28592779

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Ribo M,
   3. Flores A,
   4. Rubiera M, et al

   . Interhospital transfer prior to thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS Registry. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 1):i70–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010438 pmid:23117130

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Jia B,
    3. Feng L,
    4. Liebeskind DS, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy and rescue therapy for intracranial large artery occlusion with underlying atherosclerosis. J Neurointerv Surg 2017 Dec 4. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013489 pmid:29203731

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Lee JS,
    3. Hong JM,
    4. Lee KS, et al

    . Primary stent retrieval for acute intracranial large artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease. J Stroke 2016;18:96–101 doi:10.5853/jos.2015.01347 pmid:26467196

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Dobrocky T,
    3. Piechowiak E,
    4. Cianfoni A, et al

    . Thrombectomy of calcified emboli in stroke: does histology of thrombi influence the effectiveness of thrombectomy? J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:345–50 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013226 pmid:28798266

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Judge C,
    3. Mello S,
    4. Bradley D, et al

    . A systematic review of the causes and management of ischaemic stroke caused by nontissue emboli. Stroke Res Treat 2017;2017:7565702 doi:10.1155/2017/7565702 pmid:29123937

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Zaidat OO,
    3. Yoo AJ,
    4. Khatri P, et al

    ; Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators, STIR Revascularization working group, STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012

    FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Han HC

    . Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res 2012;49:185–97 doi:10.1159/000335123 pmid:22433458

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Burzotta F,
    3. Nerla R,
    4. Pirozzolo G, et al

    . Clinical and procedural impact of aortic arch anatomic variants in carotid stenting procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:480–89 doi:10.1002/ccd.25947 pmid:25846903

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kaymaz Z,
    3. Nikoubashman O,
    4. Brockmann M, et al

    . Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:583–88 doi:10.1177/1591019917729364 pmid:28944705

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Yilmaz U,
    3. Mühl-Benninghaus R,
    4. Simgen A, et al

    . Carotid elongation does not affect angiographic results of mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke. Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:183–87 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0345-z pmid:25231427

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S,
    4. Shah SS, et al

    . Transradial access: lessons learned from cardiology. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:487–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013295 pmid:28963366

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Mokin M,
    3. Snyder KV,
    4. Levy EI, et al

    . Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:108–13 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011007 pmid:24408927

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Piotin M,
    4. Mounayer C, et al

    . Direct cervical arterial access for intracranial endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology 2006;48:925–29 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0157-1 pmid:7102976

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Schwaiger BJ,
    3. Gersing AS,
    4. Zimmer C, et al

    . The curved MCA: influence of vessel anatomy on recanalization results of mechanical thrombectomy after acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:971–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4222 pmid:25634721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Yamamoto S,
    3. Yamagami H,
    4. Todo K, et al

    . Correlation of middle cerebral artery tortuosity with successful recanalization using the Merci retrieval system with or without adjunctive treatments. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014;54:113–19 doi:10.2176/nmc.oa2012-0348 pmid:24162242

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Sporns PB,
    3. Hanning U,
    4. Schwindt W, et al

    . Ischemic stroke: histological thrombus composition and pre-interventional CT attenuation are associated with intervention time and rate of secondary embolism. Cerebrovasc Dis 2017:344–50 doi:10.1159/000481578 pmid:29130956

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Boeckh-Behrens T,
    4. Simon S, et al

    . Risk of thrombus fragmentation during endovascular stroke treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:991–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5105 pmid:28279987

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Gunning GM,
    3. McArdle K,
    4. Mirza M, et al

    . Clot friction variation with fibrin content; implications for resistance to thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:34–38 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012721 pmid:28044009

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Liebeskind DS,
    4. Jahan R, et al

    . Thrombus branching and vessel curvature are important determinants of middle cerebral artery trunk recanalization with Merci thrombectomy devices. Stroke 2012;43:787–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.612986 pmid:22282888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Seker F,
    3. Pfaff J,
    4. Wolf M, et al

    . Impact of thrombus length on recanalization and clinical outcome following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:937–39 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012591 pmid:27634955

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Weisstanner C,
    3. Gratz PP,
    4. Schroth G, et al

    . Thrombus imaging in acute stroke: correlation of thrombus length on susceptibility-weighted imaging with endovascular reperfusion success. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1735–41 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3200-3 pmid:24832928

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Kannath SK,
    3. Rajan JE,
    4. Sylaja PN, et al

    . Dwell time of Stentriever influences complete revascularization and first-pass TICI 3 revascularization in acute large vessel occlusive stroke. World Neurosurg 2018;110:169–73 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.155 pmid:29113900

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Lapergue B,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Gory B, et al.

    ASTER Trial Investigators. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:443–52 doi:10.1001/jama.2017.9644 pmid:28763550

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Gory B,
    3. Mazighi M,
    4. Blanc R, et al

    ; Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Research Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: influence of reperfusion on clinical outcome and impact of the first-line strategy (ADAPT vs stent retriever). J Neurosurg 2018 Jan 12:1–10. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2017.7.JNS171043 pmid:9327997

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Consoli A,
    3. Rosi A,
    4. Coskun O, et al

    . Thrombectomy for M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion angiographic aspect of the arterial occlusion and recanalization: a preliminary observation. 2018;49:1286–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018987 pmid:29618557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Najm M,
    4. Al-Ajlan F, et al

    . Abstract 186: IV tPA recanalization rates by site of occlusion and time after tPA bolus: main results of the Interrsect Multinational Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke 2017;48:A186. http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/48/Suppl_1/A186.abstract. Accessed January 4, 2018
35. 35.↵
    2. Goh D,
    3. Jin S,
    4. Jeong HW, et al

    . Mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection. Neurointervention 2016;11:114–19 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.114 pmid:27621948

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Zhao W,
    3. Che R,
    4. Shang S, et al

    . Low-dose tirofiban improves functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Stroke 2017;48:3289–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019193 pmid:29127270

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Brekenfeld C,
    3. Schroth G,
    4. Mattle HP, et al

    . Stent placement in acute cerebral artery occlusion: use of a self-expandable intracranial stent for acute stroke treatment. Stroke 2009;40:847–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533810 pmid:19182080

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Baek JH,
    3. Kim BM,
    4. Kim DJ, et al

    . Stenting as a rescue treatment after failure of mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large artery occlusion. Stroke 2016;47:2360–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014073 pmid:27444259

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Crosa R,
    3. Spiotta AM,
    4. Negrotto M, et al

    . “Y-stent retriever”: a new rescue technique for refractory large-vessel occlusions? J Neurosurg 2018;128:1349–53 doi:10.3171/2016.12.JNS161233 pmid:28524799

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Chang Y,
    3. Kim BM,
    4. Bang OY, et al

    . Rescue stenting for failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter experience. Stroke 2018;49:958–64 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020072 pmid:29581342

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Saber H,
    3. Narayanan S,
    4. Palla M, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:620–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013515 pmid:29127196

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Marks MP,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Nogueira RG,
    3. Jadhav AP,
    4. Haussen DC, et al

    ; DAWN Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.
    2. Adams HP,
    3. Bendixen BH,
    4. Kappelle LJ, et al

    . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text