Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Etminan N,
   3. Rinkel GJ

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:699–713 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150 pmid:27808265

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Morita A,
   3. Kirino T,
   4. Hashi K, et al

   ; the UCAS Japan Investigators. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer M,
   4. Brown RD Jr., et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Raschi M

   . Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:1366–83 doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0723-0 pmid:23242844

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Kayembe KN,
   3. Sasahara M,
   4. Hazama F

   . Cerebral aneurysms and variations in the circle of Willis. Stroke 1984;15:846–50 doi:10.1161/01.STR.15.5.846 pmid:6474536

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Shimogonya Y,
   3. Fukuda S

   . Computational and experimental studies into the hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering 2016;11:15–00488 doi:10.1299/jbse.15-00488

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Natarajan SK,
   4. Tremmel M, et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Signorelli F,
   3. Sela S,
   4. Gesualdo L, et al

   . Hemodynamic stress, inflammation, and intracranial aneurysm development and rupture: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018;115:234–44 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.143 pmid:29709752

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Takao H,
   3. Murayama Y,
   4. Otsuka S, et al

   . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640995 pmid:22363053

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Weir J, et al

    . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2419 pmid:21127144

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Schneiders JJ,
    4. Potters WV, et al

    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3901 pmid:24651816

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Peiffer V,
    3. Sherwin SJ,
    4. Weinberg PD

    . Computation in the rabbit aorta of a new metric: the transverse wall shear stress—to quantify the multidirectional character of disturbed blood flow. J Biomech 2013;46:2651–58 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.003 pmid:24044966

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Aoki T,
    3. Yamamoto K,
    4. Fukuda M, et al

    . Sustained expression of MCP-1 under low wall shear stress concomitant with turbulent flow in endothelial cells of intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2016;4:48 doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0318-3 pmid:27160403

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Chien S

    . Effects of disturbed flow on endothelial cells. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:554–62 doi:10.1007/s10439-007-9426-3 pmid:18172767

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Aoki T,
    3. Kataoka H,
    4. Shimamura M, et al

    . NF- kappaB is a key mediator of cerebral aneurysm formation. Circulation 2007;116:2830–40 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728303 pmid:18025535

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Nuki Y,
    3. Tsou TL,
    4. Kurihara C, et al

    . Elastase-induced intracranial aneurysms in hypertensive mice. Hypertension 2009;54:1337–44 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138297 pmid:19884566

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Aoki T,
    3. Fukuda M,
    4. Nishimura M, et al

    . Critical role of TNF-alpha-TNFR1 signaling in intracranial aneurysm formation. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:34 doi:10.1186/2051-5960-2-34 pmid:24685329

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Shojima M,
    3. Oshima M,
    4. Takagi K, et al

    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f pmid:15514200

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Ho A,
    4. Gross BA, et al

    . Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;117:913–19 doi:10.3171/2012.7.JNS111766 pmid:22957531

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Maiti TK,
    3. Bir SC,
    4. Patra DP, et al

    . 158 Morphological parameters for anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2016;63:163–64 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000489727.54111.8a

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    2. Kashiwazaki D,
    3. Kuroda S

    ; Sapporo SAH Study Group. Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (<5 mm) aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2169–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001138 pmid:23743979

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Baharoglu MI,
    4. Gao BL, et al

    . Incremental contribution of size ratio as a discriminant for rupture status in cerebral aneurysms: comparison with size, height, and vessel diameter. Neurosurgery 2012;70:944–51; discussion 951–52 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823bcda7 pmid:21997542

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Sugiyama S,
    3. Niizuma K,
    4. Sato K, et al

    . Blood flow into basilar tip aneurysms: a predictor for recanalization after coil embolization. Stroke 2016;47:2541–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013555 pmid:27625377

    Abstract/FREE Full Text