Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Woven EndoBridge 17 Device Including Midterm Follow-Up Results: A Retrospective Analysis

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. Molyneux A.

   Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Caroff J,
   3. Mihalea C,
   4. Klisch C, et al

   . Single-layer WEBs: intrasaccular flow disrupters for aneurysm treatment—feasibility results from a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1942–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4369 pmid:26159516

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Costalat V,
   4. Moret J, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 2016;214:1250–56 doi:10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Asnafi S,
   3. Rouchaud A,
   4. Pierot L, et al

   . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fiorella D,
   3. Molineux A,
   4. Coon A, et al

   . Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB intra-saccular therapy study (WEB-IT). J NeuroInterv Surg 2017;0:1191–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841 pmid:28096478

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Popielski J,
   3. Berlis A,
   4. Weber W, et al

   . Two-center experience in the endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms using the WEB device: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:111–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5413 pmid:29051205

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Tau N,
   3. Sadeh-Gonik U,
   4. Aulagner G, et al

   . The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: update of a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;166:110–15 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.025 pmid:29408767

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. van Rooij SB,
   3. Peluso JP,
   4. Sluzewski M, et al

   . The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:859–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5608 pmid:29567650

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Jiang B,
   3. Paff M,
   4. Colby GP, et al

   . Cerebral aneurysm treatment: modern endovascular techniques. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2016;1:93–100 doi:10.1136/svn-2016-000027 pmid:28959469

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Lescher S,
    3. Du Mesnil de Rochemont R,
    4. Berkefeld J.

    Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured aneurysms: a single center experience. Neuroradiology 2016;58:383–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1641-x pmid:26767527

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Vajda Z,
    4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Moret J,
    4. Barreau X, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–56 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Arthur AS,
    3. Molyneux A,
    4. Coon AL, et al; WEB-IT Study investigators

    . The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) study. J Neurointervent Surg 2019 Apr 16. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 pmid:30992395

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Feng X,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Guo E, et al

    . Progressive occlusion and recanalization after endovascular treatment for 287 unruptured small aneurysms (<5 mm): a single-center 6-year experience. World Neurosurg 2017;103:576–83 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.017 pmid:28416410

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Caroff J,
    4. Pagiola I, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of the fifth generation Woven EndoBridge device: technical note. J Neurointervent Surg 2019;0:1–5 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Narata AP, et al

    . Should indications for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series of 20 patients with aneurysms in “atypical” locations for WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:203–09 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.011 pmid:28262374

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kabbasch C,
    3. Goertz L,
    4. Siebert E, et al

    . Treatment strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven Endobridge implantation. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:390–95 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014230 pmid:30154251

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Hagen F,
    3. Maurer C,
    4. Berlis A.

    Endovascular treatment of unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms regardless of aneurysm morphology: short- and long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:503–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5977 pmid:30765382

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Behme D,
    3. Berlis A,
    4. Weber W, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge intrasaccular flow disruptor for the treatment of ruptured and unruptured wide-neck cerebral aneurysms: report of 55 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1501–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4323 pmid:25953761

    Abstract/FREE Full Text