Access-Site Complications in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Review of Prospective Trials

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Windecker S,
   3. Kolh P,
   4. Alfonso F, et al

   ; Authors/Task Force members. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2541–49 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278 pmid:25173339

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Roffi M,
   3. Patrono C,
   4. Collet JP, et al

   ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:267–315 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 pmid:26320110

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Mehta SR,
   3. Jolly SS,
   4. Cairns J, et al

   ; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2490–99 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050 pmid:23103036

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Valgimigli M,
   3. Gagnor A,
   4. Calabro P, et al

   ; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2465–76 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6 pmid:25791214

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Snelling B,
   3. Sur S,
   4. Shah S, et al

   . Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:874–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013584 pmid:29311120

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Patel P,
   3. Haussen DC,
   4. Nogueira RG, et al

   . The neuro radialist. Interv Cardiol Clin 2020;9:75–86 doi:10.1016/j.iccl.2019.08.008 pmid:31733743

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Jolly SS,
   3. Yusuf S,
   4. Cairns J, et al

   ; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377: 1409–20 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 pmid:21470671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Lee DG,
   3. Lee DH,
   4. Shim JH, et al

   . Feasibility of the transradial or the transbrachial approach in various neurointerventional procedures. Neurointervention 2015;10:74–81 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.74 pmid:26389010

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Haussen DC,
   3. Nogueira RG,
   4. DeSousa KG, et al

   . Transradial access in acute ischemic stroke intervention. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:247–50 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011519 pmid:25561585

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S,
    4. Shah SS, et al

    . Transradial access: lessons learned from cardiology. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:487–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013295 pmid:28963366

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S,
    4. Shah SS, et al

    . Transradial approach for complex anterior and posterior circulation interventions: technical nuances and feasibility of using current devices. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019;17:293–302 doi:10.1093/ons/opy352 pmid:30496537

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Dahm JB,
    3. Vogelgesang D,
    4. Hummel A, et al

    . A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:172–76 doi:10.1002/ccd.10321 pmid:12357515

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Nikoubashman O,
    3. Nikoubashman A,
    4. Büsen M, et al

    . Necessary catheter diameters for mechanical thrombectomy with ADAPT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2277–81 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5401 pmid:29025728

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Liberati A,
    4. Tetzlaff J, et al

    ; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 pmid:20171303

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Altman DG,
    4. Tetzlaff J, et al

    . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 pmid:19621070

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Gralla J,
    4. Davalos A, et al

    . Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of mechanical thrombectomy using Solitaire flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:2802–07 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001232 pmid:23908066

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Smith WS,
    3. Sung G,
    4. Saver J, et al

    ; Multi MERCI Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2008;39:1205–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497115 pmid:18309168

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Marks MP,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    ; DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Akins P,
    3. Amar A,
    4. Pakbaz R, et al

    ; SWIFT Investigators. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute stroke in the SWIFT trial with Solitaire and Merci devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:524–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3707 pmid:24029392

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Demchuk AM,
    4. Menon BK, et al

    ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Jovin TG,
    3. Chamorro A,
    4. Cobo E, et al

    ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–2306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Mitchell PJ,
    4. Kleinig TJ, et al

    ; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Nogueira RG,
    3. Jadhav AP,
    4. Haussen DC, et al

    ; DAWN Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Gornbein J, et al

    ; MR RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1212793 pmid:23394476

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Ducrocq X,
    4. Mas JL, et al

    ; THRACE investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1138–47 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6 pmid:27567239

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Mani R,
    3. Eisenberg RL,
    4. McDonald EJ Jr., et al

    . Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures, I: criteria and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;131:861–65 doi:10.2214/ajr.131.5.861 pmid:101045

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Sobolev M,
    3. Slovut DP,
    4. Lee Chang A, et al

    . Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the femoral artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol 2015;27:318–23 pmid:26136279

    PubMed