Fetal Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Open Neural Tube Defects: Prenatal Imaging Evaluation and Perinatal Outcomes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Coleman BG,
   2. Langer JE,
   3. Horii SC

   . The diagnostic features of spina bifida: the role of ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;37:179–96 doi:10.1159/000364806 pmid:25341807

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Goldstein RB,
   2. Podrasky AE,
   3. Filly RA, et al

   . Effacement of the fetal cisterna magna in association with myelomeningocele. Radiology 1989;172:409–13 doi:10.1148/radiology.172.2.2664865 pmid:2664865

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. D’Addario V,
   2. Rossi AC,
   3. Pinto V, et al

   . Comparison of six sonographic signs in the prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida. J Perinat Med 2008;36:330–34 doi:10.1515/JPM.2008.052 pmid:18598123

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Pretorius DH,
   2. Russ PD,
   3. Rumack CM, et al

   . Diagnosis of brain neuropathology in utero. Neuroradiology 1986;28:386–97 doi:10.1007/BF00344094 pmid:3540704

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Araujo Júnior E,
   2. Nakano ML,
   3. Nardozza LMM, et al

   . Comparison between 2D ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessing brain and spine parameters in fetuses with spina bifida. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:845–49 doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2656-0 pmid:23208462

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Aertsen M,
   2. Verduyckt J,
   3. De Keyzer F, et al

   . Reliability of MR imaging-based posterior fossa and brain stem measurements in open spinal dysraphism in the era of fetal surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:191–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5930 pmid:30591508

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Aaronson OS,
   2. Hernanz-Schulman M,
   3. Bruner JP, et al

   . Myelomeningocele: prenatal evaluation–comparison between transabdominal US and MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:839–43 doi:10.1148/radiol.2273020535 pmid:12714679

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Variend S,
   2. Emery JL

   . Cervical dislocation of the cerebellum in children with meningomyelocele. Teratology 1976;13:281–89 doi:10.1002/tera.1420130307

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   1. Bouchard S,
   2. Davey MG,
   3. Rintoul NE, et al

   . Correction of hindbrain herniation and anatomy of the vermis after in utero repair of myelomeningocele in sheep. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:451–58 doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50078 pmid:12632366

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Paek BW,
    2. Farmer DL,
    3. Wilkinson CC, et al

    . Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1119–23 doi:10.1067/mob.2000.108867 pmid:11084552

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Adzick NS,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Spong CY, et al

    . A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011;364:993-1004 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1014379 pmid:21306277

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Moldenhauer JS,
    2. Soni S,
    3. Rintoul NE, et al

    . Fetal myelomeningocele repair: the post-MOMS experience at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;37:235–40 doi:10.1159/000365353 pmid:25138132

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Moldenhauer JS,
    2. Adzick NS

    . Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: after the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;22:360–66 doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.08.004 pmid:29031539

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Heuer GG,
    2. Moldenhauer JS,
    3. Adzick NS

    . Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele: review of the literature and future directions. Childs Nerv Syst 2017;33:1149–55 doi:10.1007/s00381-017-3440-z pmid:28516217

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kabagambe SK,
    2. Jensen GW,
    3. Chen YJ, et al

    . Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in fetoscopic versus open repair. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018;43:161–74 doi:10.1159/000479505 pmid:28910784

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Nagaraj UD,
    2. Bierbrauer KS,
    3. Zhang B, et al

    . Hindbrain herniation in Chiari II malformation on fetal and postnatal MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1031–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5116 pmid:28279990

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Bennett KA,
    2. Carroll MA,
    3. Shannon CN, et al

    . Reducing perinatal complications and preterm delivery for patients undergoing in utero closure of fetal myelomeningocele: further modifications to the multidisciplinary surgical technique. PED 2014;14:108–14 doi:10.3171/2014.3.PEDS13266 pmid:24784979

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Moron AF,
    2. Athanasiou A,
    3. Barbosa M, et al

    . Amniotic fluid lactic acid and matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels at the time of fetal surgery for a spine defect: association with subsequent preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. BJOG 2018;125:1288–92 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15298 pmid:29786973

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Zaretsky MV,
    2. Liechty KW,
    3. Galan HL, et al

    . Modified hysterotomy closure technique for open fetal surgery. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018;44:105–11 doi:10.1159/000479683 pmid:28873371

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Elbabaa SK,
    2. Gildehaus AM,
    3. Pierson MJ, et al

    . First 60 fetal in-utero myelomeningocele repairs at Saint Louis Fetal Care Institute in the post-MOMS trial era: hydrocephalus treatment outcomes (endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculo-peritoneal shunt). Childs Nerv Syst 2017;33:1157–68 doi:10.1007/s00381-017-3428-8 pmid:28470384

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Zamłyński J,
    2. Olejek A,
    3. Koszutski T, et al

    . Comparison of prenatal and postnatal treatments of spina bifida in Poland–a non-randomized, single-center study. J Matern Neonatal Med 2014;27:1409–17 doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.858689 pmid:24156622

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Pedreira DAL,
    2. Zanon N,
    3. Nishikuni K, et al

    . Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: the CECAM trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:111.E1–111.E11 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.065 pmid:26386383

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Cohen J

    . A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46 doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

    CrossRefWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Adzick NS

    . Fetal myelomeningocele: natural history, pathophysiology, and in-utero intervention. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;15:9–14 doi:10.1016/j.siny.2009.05.002 pmid:19540177

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Danzer E,
    2. Johnson MP,
    3. Adzick NS

    . Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: progress and perspectives. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012;54:8–14 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04049.x pmid:21745203

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Partridge EA,
    2. Flake AW

    . Maternal-fetal surgery for structural malformations. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012;26:669–82 doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.03.003 pmid:22542765

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Sari A,
    2. Ahmetoglu A,
    3. Dinc H, et al

    . Fetal biometry: size and configuration of the third ventricle. Acta Radiol 2005;46:631–35 doi:10.1080/02841850510021715 pmid:16334847

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Nagaraj UD,
    2. Peiro JL,
    3. Bierbrauer KS, et al

    . Evaluation of subependymal gray matter heterotopias on fetal MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:720–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4585 pmid:26585262

    Abstract/FREE Full Text