Mapping Human Fetal Brain Maturation In Vivo Using Quantitative MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bonacquisto L

   . Antenatal screening: the first and second trimester. Aust Fam Physician 2011;40:785–87 pmid:22003480

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Whitworth M,
   2. Bricker L,
   3. Mullan C

   . Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD007058 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007058.pub3 pmid:26171896

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Sylvan K,
   2. Ryding EL,
   3. Rydhstroem H

   . Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population-based study: late ultrasound screening and prognosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1154–58 doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00649.x pmid:16305700

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Karim JN,
   2. Roberts NW,
   3. Salomon LJ, et al

   . Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:429–41 doi:10.1002/uog.17246 pmid:27546497

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Malinger G,
   2. Paladini D,
   3. Haratz KK, et al

   . ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system, Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:476–84 doi:10.1002/uog.22145 pmid:32870591

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Malinger G,
   2. Kidron D,
   3. Schreiber L, et al

   . Prenatal diagnosis of malformations of cortical development by dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:178–91 doi:10.1002/uog.3906 pmid:17219377

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Whitby EH,
   2. Paley MN,
   3. Sprigg A, et al

   . Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 2004;111:784–92 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00149.x pmid:15270925

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Whitby E,
   2. Paley MN,
   3. Davies N, et al

   . Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system abnormalities in utero in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: comparison with ultrasound. BJOG 2001;108:519–26 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00115.x pmid:11368139

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Jarvis DA,
   2. Griffiths PD

   . Current state of MRI of the fetal brain in utero. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:632–46 doi:10.1002/jmri.26316 pmid:30353990

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Rix A,
    2. Lederle W,
    3. Theek B, et al

    . Advanced ultrasound technologies for diagnosis and therapy. J Nucl Med 2018;59:740–46 doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.200030 pmid:29496981

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Schmidbauer V,
    2. Dovjak G,
    3. Geisl G, et al

    . Impact of prematurity on the tissue properties of the neonatal brainstem: a quantitative MR approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:581–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6945 pmid:33478940

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Deoni SCL,
    2. Peters TM,
    3. Rutt BK

    . High-resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:237–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.20314 pmid:15690526

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Deoni SCL,
    2. Mercure E,
    3. Blasi A, et al

    . Mapping infant brain myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2011;31:784–91 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2106-10.2011 pmid:21228187

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. McKenzie CA,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Drost DJ, et al

    . Fast acquisition of quantitative T2 maps. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:208–12 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199901)41:1<208::AID-MRM30>3.0.CO;2-T pmid:10025632

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Schmidbauer V,
    2. Geisl G,
    3. Diogo M, et al

    . SyMRI detects delayed myelination in preterm neonates. Eur Radiol 2019;29:7063–72 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06325-2 pmid:31286188

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Schmidbauer V,
    2. Geisl G,
    3. Diogo MC, et al

    . Validity of SyMRI for assessment of the neonatal brain. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:315–23 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00894-2 pmid:32161995

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Warntjes JB,
    2. Leinhard OD,
    3. West J, et al

    . Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:320 29 doi:10.1002/mrm.21635 pmid:18666127

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. McAllister A,
    2. Leach J,
    3. West H, et al

    . Quantitative synthetic MRI in children: normative intracranial tissue segmentation values during development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2364–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5398 pmid:28982788

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Tanenbaum LN,
    2. Tsiouris AJ,
    3. Johnson AN, et al

    . Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1103–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5227 pmid:28450439

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Prayer D,
    2. Malinger G,
    3. Brugger PC, et al

    . ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:671–80 doi:10.1002/uog.17412 pmid:28386907

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Hagiwara A,
    2. Warntjes M,
    3. Hori M, et al

    . SyMRI of the brain: rapid quantification of relaxation rates and proton density, with synthetic MRI, automatic brain segmentation, and myelin measurement. Invest Radiol 2017;52:647–57 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000365 pmid:28257339

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kang KM,
    2. Choi SH,
    3. Kim H, et al

    . The effect of varying slice thickness and interslice gap on T1 and T2 measured with the multidynamic multiecho sequence. MRMS 2019;18:126–33 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0010 pmid:29984783

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Vossough A,
    2. Limperopoulos C,
    3. Putt ME, et al

    . Development and validation of a semiquantitative brain maturation score on fetal MR images: initial results. Radiology 2013;268:200–07 doi:10.1148/radiol.13111715 pmid:23440324

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Garel C,
    2. Chantrel E,
    3. Brisse H, et al

    . Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:184–89 pmid:11158907

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Cicchetti D

    . Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 1994;6:284–90 doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. van der Knaap MS,
    2. Barkhof F,
    3. Valk J

    . Magnetic Resonance of Myelination and Myelin Disorders. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag; 2005
27. 27.↵
    1. Prayer D,
    2. Kasprian G,
    3. Krampl E, et al

    . MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:199–216 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.020 pmid:16413984

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. van der Knaap MS,
    2. van Wezel-Meijler G,
    3. Barth PG, et al

    . Normal gyration and sulcation in preterm and term neonates: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1996;200:389–96 doi:10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685331 pmid:8685331

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Poon LC,
    2. Sahota DS,
    3. Chaemsaithong P, et al

    . Transvaginal three‐dimensional ultrasound assessment of Sylvian fissures at 18–30 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:190–98 doi:10.1002/uog.20172 pmid:30381851

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Lee SM,
    2. Choi YH,
    3. You SK, et al

    . Age-related changes in tissue value properties in children: simultaneous quantification of relaxation times and proton density using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2018;53:236–45 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000435 pmid:29504952

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Ding XQ,
    2. Kucinski T,
    3. Wittkugel O, et al

    . Normal brain maturation characterized with age-related T2 relaxation times: an attempt to develop a quantitative imaging measure for clinical use. Invest Radiol 2004;39:740–46 doi:10.1097/00004424-200412000-00005 pmid:15550835

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Minkowski A

    1. Yakovlev P,
    2. Lecours A

    . The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In: Minkowski A, ed. Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life. Blackwell; 1967:3–70
33. 33.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Roy CW,
    2. Seed M,
    3. Macgowan CK

    . Accelerated MRI of the fetal heart using compressed sensing and metric optimized gating. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:2125–35 doi:10.1002/mrm.26290 pmid:27254315

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Senel LK,
    2. Kilic T,
    3. Gungor A, et al

    . Statistically segregated k-space sampling for accelerating multiple-acquisition MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019;38:1701–14 doi:10.1109/TMI.2019.2892378 pmid:30640604

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Ledig C,
    3. Hajnal JV, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of myelination patterns in preterm neonates using T2-weighted MRI. Sci Rep 2019;9:12938 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49350-3 pmid:31506514

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Barkovich AJ,
    2. Lyon G,
    3. Evrard P

    . Formation, maturation, and disorders of white matter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:447–61 pmid:1566710

    FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Dubois J,
    2. Dehaene-Lambertz G,
    3. Kulikova S, et al

    . The early development of brain white matter: a review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience 2014;276:48–71 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044 pmid:24378955

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Stoodley C,
    3. Brossard-Racine M, et al

    . Altered local cerebellar and brainstem development in preterm infants. Neuroimage 2020;213:116702 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116702 pmid:32147366

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Fitzgerald E,
    2. Boardman JP,
    3. Drake AJ

    . Preterm birth and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders: is there a role for epigenetic dysregulation? Curr Genomics 2018;19:507–21 doi:10.2174/1389202919666171229144807 pmid:30386170

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Qu F,
    2. Sun T,
    3. Chen Y, et al

    . Fetal brain tissue characterization at 1.5 T using STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5586–94 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07618-7 pmid:33523305

    CrossRefPubMed