Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

References

1. 1.↵
   U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; US Food & Drug Administration. Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfhde/hde.cfm?id=H020002. December 5, 2022; Accessed on September 12, 2022
2. 2.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Darsaut TE

   . Stenting for intracranial aneurysms: how to paint oneself into the proverbial corner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1711–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2700 pmid:21903913

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Piotin M,
   2. Blanc R,
   3. Spelle L, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:110–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558114 pmid:19959540

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Hwang G,
   2. Park H,
   3. Bang JS, et al

   . Comparison of 2-year angiographic outcomes of stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization in unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1707–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2592 pmid:21852378

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Chalouhi N,
   2. Jabbour P,
   3. Singhal S, et al

   . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Chung EJ,
   2. Shin YS,
   3. Lee CH, et al

   . Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes among stent-assisted, double-catheter, and balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide neck aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1289–95 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2104-y pmid:24806533

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hetts SW,
   2. Turk A,
   3. English JD, et al

   ; Matrix and Platinum Science Trial Investigators, Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science Trial: safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:698–705 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3755 pmid:24184523

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Liu YQ,
   2. Wang QJ,
   3. Zheng T, et al

   . Single-centre comparison of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and angiographic follow-up between coiling and stent-assisted coiling for posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:2140–44 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.033 pmid:25037315

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Ozretić D,
   2. Radoš M,
   3. Pavliša G, et al

   . Long-term angiographic outcome of stent-assisted coiling compared to non-assisted coiling of intracranial saccular aneurysms. Croat Med J 2015;56:24–31 doi:10.3325/cmj.2015.56.24 pmid:25727039

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Consoli A,
    2. Vignoli C,
    3. Renieri L, et al

    . Assisted coiling of saccular wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms: stent versus balloon. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:52–57 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011466 pmid:25428449

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Feng MT,
    2. Wen WL,
    3. Feng ZZ, et al

    . Endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms: to use stent(s) or not? Systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2016;93:271–78 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.014 pmid:27312391

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Phan K,
    2. Huo YR,
    3. Jia F, et al

    . Meta-analysis of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2016;31:15–22 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.035 pmid:27344091

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bodily KD,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Lanzino G, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1232–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2478 pmid:21546464

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Baráth K,
    2. Cassot F,
    3. Fasel JH, et al

    . Influence of stent properties on the alteration of cerebral intra-aneurysmal haemodynamics: flow quantification in elastic sidewall aneurysm models. Neurol Res 2005;27 Suppl 1:S120–28 doi:10.1179/016164105X35477 pmid:16197837

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Hirabayashi M,
    2. Ohta M,
    3. Rüfenacht DA, et al

    . Characterization of flow reduction properties in an aneurysm due to a stent. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2003;68:021918 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.021918 pmid:14525017

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Lieber BB,
    2. Gounis MJ

    . The physics of endoluminal stenting in the treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms. Neurol Res 2002;24(Suppl 1):S33–42 doi:10.1179/016164102101200014 pmid:12074435

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Lopes D,
    2. Sani S

    . Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent. Neurosurgery 2005;56:E416; discussion E416 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000147977.07736.66 pmid:15670395

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling of bifurcation aneurysms may improve endovascular treatment: a critical evaluation in an experimental model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:570–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3231 pmid:22899786

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Raymond J

    ; STAT Collaborative Group. The design of the STenting in Aneurysm Treatments (STAT) trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:178–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010065 pmid:21990519

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Boutron I,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Moher D, et al

    ; CONSORT NPT Group. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:40–47 doi:10.7326/M17-0046 pmid:28630973

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Guilbert F, et al

    . Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:147–53 doi:10.1177/159101991101700202 pmid:21696651

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Klink R,
    3. Chagnon M, et al

    . Hydrogel versus bare platinum coils in patients with large or recurrent aneurysms prone to recurrence after endovascular treatment: a randomized controlled trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:432–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5101 pmid:28082261

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Lewis SC,
    3. Gholkar A

    , et al; HELPS Trial Collaborators. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X pmid:21571149

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Benomar A,
    2. Farzin B,
    3. Gevry G, et al

    . Noninvasive angiographic results of clipped or coiled intracranial aneurysms: an inter- and intraobserver reliability study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1615–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7236 pmid:34326106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Benomar A,
    2. Farzin B,
    3. Volders D, et al

    . Angiographic results of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and inter-observer reliability study. Neuroradiology 2021;63:1511–19 doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02676-0 pmid:33625550

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Sohn MJ,
    3. Molyneux AJ, et al

    . Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–63 doi:10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0656 pmid:10193610

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Ferns SP,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Lecler A,
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Rodriguez-Régent C, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment-a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology 2015;277:173–80 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142496 pmid:26057784

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. de Gast AN,
    3. Sluzewski M

    . Results of 101 aneurysms treated with polyglycolic/polylactic acid microfilament Nexus coils compared with historical controls treated with standard coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:991–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1021 pmid:18310232

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Raymond J

    . Endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms using “bioactive” or coated-coil technologies: a systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:219–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1324 pmid:18842754

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Clarke A,
    3. Sneade M, et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke 2012;43:2544–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657254 pmid:22836352

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. McDougall CG,
    2. Johnston SC,
    3. Gholkar A

    ; et al; MAPS Investigators. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3857 pmid:24481333

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Bendok BR,
    2. Abi-Aad KR,
    3. Ward JD, et al

    ; Heat Study Investigators. The hydrogel endovascular aneurysm treatment trial (HEAT): a randomized controlled trial of the second-generation hydrogel coil. Neurosurgery 2020;86:615–24 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa006 pmid:32078692

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Ghostine J,
    3. van Adel BA, et al

    . Does increasing packing density using larger caliber coils improve angiographic results of embolization of intracranial aneurysms at 1 year: a randomized trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:29–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6362 pmid:31896568

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Gonzalez LF, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: a review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery 2012;71:785–94 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318265a416 pmid:22743359

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Yang H,
    2. Sun Y,
    3. Jiang Y, et al

    . Comparison of stent-assisted coiling vs coiling alone in 563 intracranial aneurysms: safety and efficacy at a high-volume center. Neurosurgery 2015;77:241–47; discussion 247 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000765 pmid:25856112

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Hong Y,
    2. Wang YJ,
    3. Deng Z, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e82311 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082311 pmid:24454690

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Jahshan S,
    2. Abla AA,
    3. Natarajan SK, et al

    . Results of stent-assisted vs non-stent-assisted endovascular therapies in 489 cerebral aneurysms: single-center experience. Neurosurgery 2013;72:232–39 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827b93ea pmid:23149972

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Desal H,
    3. Cognard C, et al

    . Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM): an all-inclusive care trial for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2020;141:e770–77 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.018 pmid:32526362

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Raymond J

    . Ethical care requires pragmatic care research to guide medical practice under uncertainty. Trials 2021;22:143 doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05084-0 pmid:33588946

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Januel AC,
    3. Iancu D, et al

    . The RISE trial: a randomized trial on intra-saccular Endobridge devices. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:61–67 doi:10.1177/1591019919886412 pmid:31690151

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Darsaut TE,
    2. Keough MB,
    3. Boisseau W, et al

    . Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Trial (MCAAT): A randomized care trial comparing surgical and endovascular management of MCA aneurysm patients. World Neurosurg 2022;160:e49–54 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.083 pmid:34971833

    CrossRefPubMed