Value of Immediate Flat Panel Perfusion Imaging after Endovascular Therapy (AFTERMATH): a Proof of Concept Study

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Zaidat OO,
   2. Yoo AJ,
   3. Khatri P

   , STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force, et al. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Samuels N,
   2. van de Graaf RA,
   3. van den Berg CAL

   , MR CLEAN Registry Investigators, et al. Blood pressure in the first 6 hours following endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke is associated with outcome. Stroke 2021;52:3514–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033657 pmid:34538090

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mokin M,
   2. Fargen KM,
   3. Primiani CT, et al

   . Vessel perforation during stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: technical details and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:922–28 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012707 pmid:27688267

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Diprose WK,
   2. Wang MT,
   3. Ghate K, et al

   . Adjunctive intraarterial thrombolysis in endovascular thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2021;96:1135–43 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012112

   CrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Kaesmacher J,
   2. Bellwald S,
   3. Dobrocky T, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of intra-arterial urokinase after failed, unsuccessful, or incomplete mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke. JAMA Neurol 2022;77:318–26 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4192 pmid:31816018

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kaesmacher J,
   2. Meinel TR,
   3. Kurmann C, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of intra-arterial fibrinolytics as adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational data. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;13:1073–80 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016680 pmid:33514609

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhang G,
   2. Marquering HA,
   3. Van Es AC

   , MR CLEAN Registry Investigators, et al. Operator versus core-lab adjudication of reperfusion after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018;49:2376–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022031 pmid:30355107

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Pressman E,
   2. Waqas M,
   3. Sands V, et al

   . Factors associated with decreased accuracy of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarct scoring among neurointerventionalists during thrombectomy. Stroke 2021;52:E733–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033372 pmid:34496615

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Mujanovic A,
   2. Kammer C,
   3. Kurmann CC, et al

   . Association of intravenous thrombolysis with delayed reperfusion after incomplete mechanical thrombectomy. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;33:87–98 doi:10.1007/s00062-022-01186-7 pmid:35833948

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mujanovic A,
    2. Jungi N,
    3. Kurmann CC, et al

    . Importance of delayed reperfusions in patients with incomplete thrombectomy. Stroke 2022;53:3350–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040063 pmid:36205143

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Fainardi E,
    2. Busto G,
    3. Rosi A, et al

    . T_max volumes predict final infarct size and functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients receiving endovascular treatment. Ann Neurol 2022;91:878–88 doi:10.1002/ana.26354 pmid:35285078

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Rubiera M,
    2. Garcia-Tornel A,
    3. Olivé-Gadea M, et al

    . Computed tomography perfusion after thrombectomy: an immediate surrogate marker of outcome after recanalization in acute stroke. Stroke 2020;51:1736–42 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029212 pmid:32404034

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Brugnara G,
    2. Herweh C,
    3. Neuberger U, et al

    . Dynamics of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation parameters following endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointervent Surg 2021;neurintsurg-2020-017163 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017163 pmid:33762405

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. von Elm E,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Egger M

    , STROBE Initiative, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–49 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 pmid:18313558

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Kurmann CC,
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Pilgram-Pastor S, et al

    . Correlation of collateral scores derived from whole-brain time-resolved flat panel detector imaging in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1627–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7657 pmid:36202551

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Manhart MT,
    2. Kowarschik M,
    3. Fieselmann A, et al

    . Dynamic iterative reconstruction for interventional 4-D C-arm CT perfusion imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:1336–48 doi:10.1109/TMI.2013.2257178 pmid:23568497

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al

    . Dynamic angiography and perfusion imaging using flat detector CT in the angiography suite: a pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1964–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4383 pmid:26066625

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Fieselmann A,
    2. Kowarschik M,
    3. Ganguly A, et al

    . Deconvolution-based CT and MR brain perfusion measurement: theoretical model revisited and practical implementation details. Int J Biomed Imaging 2011;2011:467563 doi:10.1155/2011/467563 pmid:21904538

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ortega-Gutierrez S,
    2. Quispe-Orozco D,
    3. Schafer S, et al

    . Angiography suite cone-beam CT perfusion for selection of thrombectomy patients: a pilot study. J Neuroimaging 2022;32:493–501 doi:10.1111/jon.12988 pmid:35315169

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Pressman E,
    2. Sands V,
    3. Flores G, et al

    . Eloquence-based reperfusion scoring and its ability to predict post-thrombectomy disability and functional status. Interv Neuroradiol 2022;28:538–46 doi:10.1177/15910199211046424 pmid:34647489

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Fedorov A,
    2. Beichel R,
    3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

    . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Morcos SK,
    2. Thomsen HS,
    3. Webb JA

    . Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1602–13 doi:10.1007/s003300050894 pmid:10525875

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Tan Z,
    2. Parsons M,
    3. Bivard A, et al

    . Optimal tissue reperfusion estimation by computed tomography perfusion post-thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2021;52:E760–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034581 pmid:34670411

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Ng FC,
    2. Churilov L,
    3. Yassi N, et al

    . Prevalence and significance of impaired microvascular tissue reperfusion despite macrovascular angiographic reperfusion (no-reflow). Neurology 2022;98:E790–801 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013210 pmid:34906976

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Park JC,
    2. Kim JE,
    3. Kang HS, et al

    . CT perfusion with angiography as a substitute for both conventional digital subtraction angiography and acetazolamide-challenged SPECT in the follow-up of postbypass patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:547–55 doi:10.1159/000319026 pmid:20948198

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Doerfler A,
    2. Gölitz P,
    3. Engelhorn T, et al

    . Flat-panel computed tomography (DYNA-CT) in neuroradiology: from high-resolution imaging of implants to one-stop-shopping for acute stroke. Clin Neuroradiol 2015;25 Suppl 2:291–97 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0423-x pmid:26091842

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    3. Kloska S, et al

    . Flat detector CT in the evaluation of brain parenchyma, intracranial vasculature, and cerebral blood volume: a pilot study in patients with acute symptoms of cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1462–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2083 pmid:20378700

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Kurmann CC,
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Cooke DL, et al

    . Evaluation of time-resolved whole brain flat panel detector perfusion imaging using RAPID ANGIO in patients with acute stroke: comparison with CT perfusion imaging. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:387–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018464 pmid:35396333

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Demeestere J,
    2. Wouters A,
    3. Christensen S, et al

    . Review of perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke: from time to tissue. Stroke 2020;51:1017–24 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028337 pmid:32008460

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Cimflova P,
    2. Singh N,
    3. Kappelhof M, et al

    . Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;9:1–7 doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-020553

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. d’Esterre CD,
    2. Boesen ME,
    3. Ahn SH, et al

    . Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:3390–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250 pmid:26514186

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Mujanovic A,
    2. Ng F,
    3. Meinel TR, et al

    . No-reflow phenomenon in stroke patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical data. Int J Stroke 2023;17474930231180434 doi:10.1177/17474930231180434 pmid:37231702

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Kosior JC,
    2. Buck B,
    3. Wannamaker R, et al

    . Exploring reperfusion following endovascular thrombectomy: a proof of concept using perfusion angiography. Stroke 2019;50:2389–95 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025537 pmid:31366315

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Mittmann BJ,
    2. Braun M,
    3. Runck F, et al

    . Deep learning-based classification of DSA image sequences of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2022;17:1633–41 doi:10.1007/s11548-022-02654-8 pmid:35604489

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Su R,
    2. Cornelissen SA,
    3. van der Sluijs M, et al

    . AutoTICI: automatic brain tissue reperfusion scoring on 2D DSA images of acute ischemic stroke patients. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2021;40:2380–91 doi:10.1109/TMI.2021.3077113 pmid:33939611

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Vagal A,
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Nael K, et al

    . Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: pearls and pitfalls for real-world use. Neurology 2019;93:888–98 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481 pmid:31636160

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Zensen S,
    2. Guberina N,
    3. Opitz M, et al

    . Radiation exposure of computed tomography imaging for the assessment of acute stroke. Neuroradiology 2021;63:511–18 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02548-z pmid:32901338

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Brehm A,
    2. Nguyen KA,
    3. Blackham KA, et al

    . Effective dose measurements of the latest-generation angiographic system in patients with acute stroke: a comparison with the newest multidetector CT generation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1621–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7658 pmid:36202555

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Jhou H,
    2. Chen P,
    3. Yang L, et al

    . Contrast‐associated acute kidney injury after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta‐analysis. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol 2022;2:1–11 doi: 10.1161/svin.121.000296

    CrossRef
40. 40.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Murad MH, et al

    . Neurons over nephrons. Stroke 2017;48:1862–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016771 pmid:28583996

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Partovi S

    . Save the brain first: CTA and mechanical thrombectomy in patients at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:637–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6515 pmid:32217552

    FREE Full Text