A Comprehensive and Broad Approach to Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Adult Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Fleminger S,
   2. Ponsford J

   . Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury. BMJ Publishing Group 2005;331:1419 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1419

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Hyder AA,
   2. Wunderlich CA,
   3. Puvanachandra P, et al

   . The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation 2007;22:341–53 doi:10.3233/NRE-2007-22502 pmid:18162698

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Coronado VG,
   2. McGuire LC,
   3. Sarmiento K, et al

   . Trends in traumatic brain injury in the US and the public health response: 1995–2009. J Safety Res 2012;43:299–307 doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2012.08.011 pmid:23127680

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Maas AI,
   2. Menon DK,
   3. Adelson PD, et al

   ; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:987–1048 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X pmid:29122524

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Kay T,
   2. Harrington DE,
   3. Adams R, et al

   . Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:86–87

   CrossRef
6. 6.↵
   1. Bazarian J,
   2. McClung J,
   3. Cheng Y, et al

   . Emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury in the USA. Emerg Med J 2005;22:473–77 doi:10.1136/emj.2004.019273 pmid:15983080

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Miller GF,
   2. DePadilla L,
   3. Xu L

   . Costs of nonfatal traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2016. Med Care 2021;59:451–55 doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001511 pmid:33528230

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Røe C,
   2. Sveen U,
   3. Alvsåker K, et al

   . Post-concussion symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury: influence of demographic factors and injury severity in a 1-year cohort study. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1235–43 doi:10.1080/09638280802532720 pmid:19116810

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Alphabetical index. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2004
10. 10.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Milham MP,
    3. Lui YW, et al

    . Default-mode network disruption in mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2012;265:882–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120748 pmid:23175546

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Chung S,
    2. Fieremans E,
    3. Wang X, et al

    . White matter tract integrity: an indicator of axonal pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2018;35:1015–20 doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5320 pmid:29239261

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Yuh EL,
    2. Hawryluk GW,
    3. Manley GT

    . Imaging concussion: a review. Neurosurgery 2014;75(Suppl 4):S50–63 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000491 pmid:25232884

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Mayer AR,
    2. Mannell MV,
    3. Ling J, et al

    . Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:1825–35 doi:10.1002/hbm.21151 pmid:21259381

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Mayer AR,
    2. Ling JM,
    3. Allen EA, et al

    . Static and dynamic intrinsic connectivity following mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2015;32:1046–55 doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3542 pmid:25318005

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Amir J,
    2. Nair JK,
    3. Del Carpio‐O’Donovan R, et al

    . Atypical resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav 2021;11:e2261 doi:10.1002/brb3.2261 pmid:34152089

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Johnson B,
    2. Zhang K,
    3. Gay M, et al

    . Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage 2012;59:511–18 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.081 pmid:21846504

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Zhang K,
    2. Johnson B,
    3. Gay M, et al

    . Default mode network in concussed individuals in response to the YMCA physical stress test. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:756–65 doi:10.1089/neu.2011.2125 pmid:22040294

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Sours C,
    2. George EO,
    3. Zhuo J, et al

    . Hyper-connectivity of the thalamus during early stages following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain imaging Behav 2015;9:550–63 doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9424-2 pmid:26153468

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Lu L,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Li F, et al

    . Aberrant static and dynamic functional network connectivity in acute mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive impairment. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:205–14 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01082-6 pmid:34463779

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Irimia A,
    2. Maher AS,
    3. Chaudhari NN, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Acute cognitive deficits after traumatic brain injury predict Alzheimer’s disease-like degradation of the human default mode network. Geroscience 2020;42:1411–29 doi:10.1007/s11357-020-00245-6 pmid:32743786

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Banks SD,
    2. Coronado RA,
    3. Clemons LR, et al

    . Thalamic functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury: longitudinal associations with patient-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:1254–61 doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.013 pmid:27085849

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Slobounov S,
    2. Gay M,
    3. Zhang K, et al

    . Alteration of brain functional network at rest and in response to YMCA physical stress test in concussed athletes: rs-fMRI study. Neuroimage 2011;55:1716–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.024 pmid:21255654

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Xiong K,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Zhang Y, et al

    . Brain functional connectivity and cognition in mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroradiology 2016;58:733–39 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1675-0 pmid:27000797

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Lu L,
    3. Shang S, et al

    . Disrupted functional network connectivity predicts cognitive impairment after acute mild traumatic brain injury. CNS Neurosci Ther 2020;26:1083–91 doi:10.1111/cns.13430 pmid:32588522

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Lv H,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Tong E, et al

    . Resting-state functional MRI: everything that nonexperts have always wanted to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1390–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5527 pmid:29348136

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Carroll L,
    2. Cassidy J,
    3. Holm L, et al

    ; WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;43:113–25 doi:10.1080/16501960410023877 pmid:15083875

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. McCrory P,
    2. Meeuwisse WH,
    3. Aubry M, et al

    . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. J Athl Train 2013;48:554–75 doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.05 pmid:23855364

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Guskiewicz KM,
    2. Register-Mihalik J,
    3. McCrory P, et al

    . Evidence-based approach to revising the SCAT2: introducing the SCAT3. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:289–93 doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092225 pmid:23479486

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S,
    2. Nieto-Castanon A

    . CONN: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect 2012;2:125–41 doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 pmid:22642651

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Fonov V,
    2. Evans AC,
    3. Botteron K, et al

    ; Brain Development Cooperative Group. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage 2011;54:313–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.033 pmid:20656036

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Behzadi Y,
    2. Restom K,
    3. Liau J, et al

    . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 2007;37:90–101 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 pmid:17560126

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Yeo BT,
    2. Krienen FM,
    3. Sepulcre J, et al

    . The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 2011;106:1125–65 doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 pmid:21653723

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Power JD,
    2. Cohen AL,
    3. Nelson SM, et al

    . Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 2011;72:665–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006 pmid:22099467

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Desikan RS,
    2. Ségonne F,
    3. Fischl B, et al

    . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31:968–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 pmid:16530430

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N,
    2. Landeau B,
    3. Papathanassiou D, et al

    . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 pmid:11771995

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Alahmadi AA

    . Effects of different smoothing on global and regional resting functional connectivity. Neuroradiology 2021;63:99–109 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02523-8 pmid:32840683

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Zou QH,
    2. Zhu CZ,
    3. Yang Y, et al

    . An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Methods 2008;172:137–41 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012 pmid:18501969

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Zalesky A,
    2. Fornito A,
    3. Bullmore ET

    . Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 2010;53:1197–207 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 pmid:20600983

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Nichols TE

    . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44:83–98 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 pmid:18501637

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Shi J,
    2. Teng J,
    3. Du X, et al

    . Multi-modal analysis of resting-state fMRI data in mTBI patients and association with neuropsychological outcomes. Front Neurol 2021;12:639760 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.639760 pmid:34079510

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Vergara VM,
    2. Mayer AR,
    3. Kiehl KA, et al

    . Dynamic functional network connectivity discriminates mild traumatic brain injury through machine learning. Neuroimage Clin 2018;19:30–37 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.017 pmid:30034999

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Zhan J,
    2. Gao L,
    3. Zhou F, et al

    . Decreased regional homogeneity in patients with acute mild traumatic brain injury: a resting-state fMRI study. J Nerv Ment Dis 2015;203:786–91 doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000368 pmid:26348589

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. van der Horn HJ,
    2. Liemburg EJ,
    3. Scheenen ME, et al

    . Graph analysis of functional brain networks in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 2017;12:e0171031 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171031 pmid:28129397

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Hou W,
    2. Sours Rhodes C,
    3. Jiang L, et al

    . Dynamic functional network analysis in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Connect 2019;9:475–87 doi:10.1089/brain.2018.0629 pmid:30982332

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Boroda E,
    2. Armstrong M,
    3. Gilmore CS, et al

    . Network topology changes in chronic mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Neuroimage Clin 2021;31:102691 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102691 pmid:34023667

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Nathan DE,
    2. Bellgowan JF,
    3. Oakes TR, et al

    . Assessing quantitative changes in intrinsic thalamic networks in blast and nonblast mild traumatic brain injury: implications for mechanisms of injury. Brain Connect 2016;6:389–402 doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0403 pmid:26956452

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Arciniega H,
    2. Shires J,
    3. Furlong S, et al

    . Impaired visual working memory and reduced connectivity in undergraduates with a history of mild traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 2021;11:2789–13 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-80995-1 pmid:33531546

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Marek S,
    2. Tervo-Clemmens B,
    3. Calabro FJ, et al

    . Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature 2022;603:654–60 doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9 pmid:35296861

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Vergara VM,
    2. Mayer AR,
    3. Damaraju E, et al

    . Detection of mild traumatic brain injury by machine learning classification using resting state functional network connectivity and fractional anisotropy. J Neurotrauma 2017;34:1045–53 doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4526 pmid:27676221

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Vergara VM,
    2. Damaraju E,
    3. Mayer AB, et al

    . The impact of data preprocessing in traumatic brain injury detection using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015;2015:5432–35 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319620 pmid:26737520

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Storey JD,
    2. Tibshirani R

    . Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9440–45 doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 pmid:12883005

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Efron B

    . Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. J Am Stat Assoc 2007;102:93–103 doi:10.1198/016214506000001211

    CrossRefWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Frati A,
    2. Cerretani D,
    3. Fiaschi AI, et al

    . Diffuse axonal injury and oxidative stress: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:2600 doi:10.3390/ijms18122600 pmid:29207487

    CrossRefPubMed