Automated Detection of Steno-Occlusive Lesion on Time-of-Flight MR Angiography: An Observer Performance Study

References

1. 1.↵
   Group GBDNDC. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:877–97

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Katan M,
   2. Luft A

   . Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol 2018;38:208–11 doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649503 pmid:29791947

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Arenillas JF

   . Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke 2011;42:S20–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597278 pmid:21164126

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Sacco RL,
   2. Kargman DE,
   3. Gu Q, et al

   . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20 doi:10.1161/01.str.26.1.14 pmid:7839388

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Wityk RJ,
   2. Lehman D,
   3. Klag M, et al

   . Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke 1996;27:1974–80 doi:10.1161/01.str.27.11.1974 pmid:8898801

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Choi CG,
   2. Lee DH,
   3. Lee JH, et al

   . Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:439–46

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Li Q,
   2. Tian CL,
   3. Yang YW, et al

   . Conventional T2-weighted imaging to detect high-grade stenosis and occlusion of internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, and basilar artery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:1591–96 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.028 pmid:25900410

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Chen L,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Balu N, et al

   . Development of a quantitative intracranial vascular features extraction tool on 3D MRA using semiautomated open-curve active contour vessel tracing. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:3229–38 doi:10.1002/mrm.26961 pmid:29044753

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Qiu J,
   2. Tan G,
   3. Lin Y, et al

   . Automated detection of intracranial artery stenosis and occlusion in magnetic resonance angiography: a preliminary study based on deep learning. Magn Reson Imaging 2022;94:105–11 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.006 pmid:36174873

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Choi D,
    2. Kim T,
    3. Jang J, et al

    . Intracranial steno-occlusive lesion detection on time-of-flight MR angiography using multi-task learning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2023;107:102220 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102220 pmid:37023509

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ronneberger O,
    2. Fischer P,
    3. Brox T

    . U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Springer-Verlag; 2015:234–41
12. 12.↵
    1. Lee K,
    2. Sunwoo L,
    3. Kim T, et al

    . Spider U-Net: incorporating inter-slice connectivity using LSTM for 3D blood vessel segmentation. Applied Sciences 2021;11:2014 doi:10.3390/app11052014

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Chakraborty DP,
    2. Berbaum KS

    . Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004;31:2313–30 doi:10.1118/1.1769352 pmid:15377098

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Dorfman DD,
    2. Berbaum KS,
    3. Metz CE

    . Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiology 1992;27:723–31 doi:10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Youden WJ

    . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32–35 doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Kotz S,
    2. Read CB,
    3. Balakrishnan N, et al

    1. Koch GG

    . Intraclass correlation coefficient. In: Kotz S, Read CB, Balakrishnan N, et al. eds. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004:
17. 17.↵
    1. Benchoufi M,
    2. Matzner-Lober E,
    3. Molinari N, et al

    . Interobserver agreement issues in radiology. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020;101:639–41 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2020.09.001 pmid:32958434

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Feldmann E,
    2. Wilterdink JL,
    3. Kosinski A, et al

    . The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology 2007;68:2099–106 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000261488.05906.c1 pmid:17409371

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Lee CS,
    2. Nagy PG,
    3. Weaver SJ, et al

    . Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:611–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10375 pmid:23971454

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Dou Q,
    3. Jin Y-M, et al

    . Deep learning for automated contouring of primary tumor volumes by MRI for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiology 2019;291:677–86 doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182012 pmid:30912722

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Klontzas ME,
    2. Gatti AA,
    3. Tejani AS, et al

    . AI reporting guidelines: How to select the best one for your research. Radiology Artif Intell 2023;5:e23005 doi:10.1148/ryai.230055 pmid:37293341

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Pham N,
    2. Hill V,
    3. Rauschecker A, et al

    . Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-enabled imaging tools using the levels of evidence system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:E21–E28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7850 pmid:37080722

    Abstract/FREE Full Text