Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

OtherBRAIN

Depiction of the Cranial Nerves Within the Brain Stem with Use of PROPELLER Multishot Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

M. Adachi, H. Kabasawa and E. Kawaguchi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 911-912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0957
M. Adachi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Kabasawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Kawaguchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Despite the recent progress of MR imaging, visualization of the cranial nerves within the brain stem has not been accomplished. Periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot diffusion-weighted imaging, an effective method for compensating for motion and distortion, offers high-quality diffusion-weighted images. We succeeded in depicting the cranial nerves within the brain stem in some subjects by using this method with motion-probing gradient applied in the superior-inferior direction.

There are many disorders of the cranial nerves, including neoplasm, inflammation, and vascular compression. MR imaging with gradient-echo or fast spin-echo sequences with 3D Fourier transformation has recently enabled depiction of the cranial nerves in the cisterns around the brain stem.1–5 However, to the best of our knowledge, visualization of these nerves within the brain stem itself has not been accomplished. We succeeded in depicting the cranial nerves within the brain stem in some of the subjects in this preliminary study by using periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) multishot diffusion-weighted imaging.6,7 We present diffusion-weighted images that depict the cranial nerves and the rate of their visualization within the brain stem.

Technique

We enrolled 8 healthy volunteers: 5 men and 3 women; mean age, 33.6 ± 9.3 years. We explained the purpose of the MR study to the volunteers and obtained their prior consent.

We performed the MR study in all subjects by using a 1.5T superconducting system (Signa Excite; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis) and an 8-channel neurovascular phased-array coil. We obtained PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging sequences by applying motion-probing gradients (MPG) in 3 orthogonal directions for each section and using fast spin-echo imaging. We obtained 3-orthogonal-axis images (superior-inferior [SI], right-left [RL], anterior-posterior [AP]) as well as isotropic diffusion-weighted images that were generated by averaging the images in the 3 axes. We also obtained short-τ inversion recovery (STIR) images, which provided good contrast between gray and white matter.8 The scan range was from the medulla oblongata to the midbrain.

The parameters for fast spin-echo PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging were as follows: matrix size, 192 × 192; TR, 6000 ms; TE, 130.9 ms; echo-train length, 24; blade number, 32; band width, 62.5 KHz; b-factor, 850 seconds/mm2; NEX, 4; section thickness, 3 mm; section gap, 0.5 mm; FOV, 24 × 24 cm; 15 section sections; total imaging time, 12 minutes 54 seconds. The parameters for STIR imaging were as follows: matrix size, 512 × 256; TR, 5500 ms; TE, 25.9 ms; TI, 150 ms; NEX, 2; section thickness, 3 mm; section gap, 0.5 mm; 15 section sections; imaging time, 4 minutes 30 seconds.

These images were evaluated at random by 2 observers (M.A. and E.K), who arrived at their conclusions by mutual consent. They focused on linear high-intensity components in the brain stem.

Results

Diffusion-weighted images with MPG applied in the SI direction depicted 3 (18.8%) of 16 oculomotor nerves (Fig 1), 11 (68.8%) trigeminal nerves (Fig 2), and 7 (43.8%) vestibulocochlear nerves (Fig 3) as high-intensity linear areas. Diffusion-weighted images with MPG applied in the AP direction depicted only 2 (12.5%) vestibulocochlear nerves; however, on these images with MPG applied in the AP direction, the vestibulocochlear nerves were depicted unclearly in the tegmentum of the pons, which displayed high signal intensity. No cranial nerves were depicted in the brain stem on diffusion-weighted images with MPG applied in the RL direction or on STIR images. In addition, we could not identify any nucleus in the tegmentum of the brain stem on diffusion-weighted or on STIR images.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Images of a 44-year-old male volunteer. A, Multishot diffusion-weighted image with MPG applied in the SI direction shows the left ophthalmic nerve not only in the cistern (arrow) but also in the midbrain (arrowhead). The bright signals in the center of the midbrain are considered to be the decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle running in the lateral direction. B, STIR image shows the cisternal portion of the left ophthalmic nerve (arrow); however, the nerve is not identified in the midbrain.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Images of a 30-year-old female volunteer. A,B, Multishot diffusion-weighted images with MPG applied in the SI direction show both trigeminal nerves as slightly curved high-intensity lines in the mid-pons (arrows). C,D, The trigeminal nerves are not identified in the mid-pons on the STIR images.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Images of a 34-year-old male volunteer. A, Multishot diffusion-weighted image with MPG applied in the SI direction shows the left acoustic nerve as a linear high-intensity line in the brain stem (black arrow) as well as in the cistern (white arrow). B, STIR image shows the left acoustic nerve in the cerebellar-pontine cistern (arrow); however, it is not identified in the brain stem.

Discussion

PROPELLER, developed by Pipe et al6,7, is a radial data sampling method in which k-space is composed in blades, including some rectilinear samplings. This is an effective method for compensating for motion and distortion and offers high-quality multishot diffusion-weighted images without distortion or phase artifact.

We attempted to depict cranial nerves within the brain stem using PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging. Visualization of the oculomotor, trigeminal, and vestibulocochlear nerves was achieved in some subjects as linear high-signal intensities on PROPELLER with MPG applied in the SI direction.

Nerve fiber bundles parallel to the direction of the MPG are depicted as low intensities, whereas those perpendicular to the direction of the MPG are depicted as high intensities on diffusion-weighted images because of their anisotropic water diffusion.9 From an anatomic standpoint, the cranial nerves originate from the tegmentum and run in an antero-oblique direction. The images with MPG applied in the SI direction are the most perpendicular to the cranial nerve fibers within the brain stem, among those with MPG in 3 directions. In contrast, the white matter components surrounding the cranial nerves (the superior cerebellar peduncle, longitudinal pontine fasciculi, medial longitudinal fasciculus, central tegmental tract, and reticular formation) run almost parallel to the SI direction. The decussation of the superior cerebellar peduncle, the transverse pontine fiber bundles, and the middle cerebellar peduncle then run in a lateral oblique direction. Therefore, diffusion-weighted images with MPG applied in the SI direction should provide good contrast between the cranial nerves and the surrounding white matter.

Numerous recent articles have addressed diffusion tensor imaging and white matter tractography.10–13 These reports have established that white matter tractography can reconstruct the major white matter structures, for example, the corticospinal tract. However, no studies have demonstrated the cranial nerves within the brain stem, even with use of the 3T superconducting systems that are now available. Therefore, PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging is thought to be a valuable tool in revealing anatomic details of the cranial nerves and determining the relationship between the cranial nerves and lesions such as tumors, hematomas, and infarcts.

Although we attempted to depict cranial nerve fibers using 5-to-7-mm-thick images, there was insufficient contrast to discriminate the nerves from the surrounding white matter. We consider that thin-section images, at least 3 mm thick, would be required to depict cranial nerves. However, the signal-to-noise ratio of 3-mm-thick images is worse than that of 5-to-7-mm-thick images, and the quality is currently insufficient to enable evaluation of the cranial nerves in the clinical setting. It would be of great value in future studies to improve the signal-to-noise ratio with use of high-T superconducting system.

Conclusion

We succeeded in depicting the cranial nerves within the brain stem in some subjects using PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging with MPG applied in the SI direction. However, the ratio of visualization was insufficient for use in the clinical setting. Improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio remains an issue for future study.

References

  1. ↵
    Stuckey SL, Harris AJ, Mannolini SM. Detection of acoustic schwannoma: use of constructive interference in the steady state three-dimensional MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1219–25
    Abstract
  2. Shibata A, Hosoya T, Kato T, et al. Abducens nerve enhancement in acute ophthalmoparesis. Radiat Med 1998;16:375–77
    PubMed
  3. Korogi Y, Nagahiro S, Du C, et al. Evaluation of vascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia by 3D time-of-flight MRA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:879–84
    PubMed
  4. Du C, Korogi Y, Nagahiro S, et al. Hemifacial spasm; three-dimensional MR images in the evaluation of neurovascular compression. Radiology 1995;197:227–31
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Girard N, Poncet M, Caces F, et al. Three-dimensional MRI of hemifacial spasm with surgical correlation. Neuroradiology 1997;39:46–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Pipe JG, Farthing VG, Forbes KP. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI [published erratum appears in Magn Reson Med 2002;47:621]. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:42–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Oikawa H, Sasaki M, Tamakawa Y, et al. The substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: proton density-weighted spin-echo and fast short inversion time inversion-recovery MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1747–56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Kucharczyk J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 1990;176:439–45
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637–48
    PubMed
  11. Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, et al. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999;45:265–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Wakata S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, et al. Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology 2004;230:77–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Masutani Y, Aoki S, Abe O, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging: recent advance and new techniques for diffusion tensor visualization. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:53–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 25, 2007.
  • Accepted after revision September 24, 2007.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 5
May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Depiction of the Cranial Nerves Within the Brain Stem with Use of PROPELLER Multishot Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Adachi, H. Kabasawa, E. Kawaguchi
Depiction of the Cranial Nerves Within the Brain Stem with Use of PROPELLER Multishot Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 911-912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0957

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Depiction of the Cranial Nerves Within the Brain Stem with Use of PROPELLER Multishot Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
M. Adachi, H. Kabasawa, E. Kawaguchi
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2008, 29 (5) 911-912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0957
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine
  • Crossref (12)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • PROPELLER Technique to Improve Image Quality of MRI of the Shoulder
    Tobias J. Dietrich, Erika J. Ulbrich, Marco Zanetti, Sandro F. Fucentese, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2011 197 6
  • Anatomic Considerations, Nomenclature, and Advanced Cross-sectional Imaging Techniques for Visualization of the Cranial Nerve Segments by MR Imaging
    Ari M. Blitz, Asim F. Choudhri, Zachary D. Chonka, Ahmet T. Ilica, Leonardo L. Macedo, Avneesh Chhabra, Gary L. Gallia, Nafi Aygun
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2014 24 1
  • BLADE in Sagittal T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine
    C. Fellner, C. Menzel, F.A. Fellner, C. Ginthoer, N. Zorger, A. Schreyer, E.M. Jung, S. Feuerbach, T. Finkenzeller
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 4
  • High‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the human pons with a reduced field‐of‐view, multishot, variable‐density, spiral acquisition at 3 T
    Dimitrios C. Karampinos, Anh T. Van, William C. Olivero, John G. Georgiadis, Bradley P. Sutton
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2009 62 4
  • Usefulness of the application of the BLADE technique to reduce motion artifacts on navigation‐triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) T2‐weighted MRI (T2WI) of the liver
    Sumire Nanko, Hidekazu Oshima, Takeshi Watanabe, Shigeru Sasaki, Masaki Hara, Yuta Shibamoto
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2009 30 2
  • Decreased CSF-flow artefacts in T2 imaging of the cervical spine with periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER/BLADE)
    Andreas Ragoschke-Schumm, Peter Schmidt, Julia Schumm, Georg Reimann, Hans-Joachim Mentzel, Werner A. Kaiser, Thomas E. Mayer
    Neuroradiology 2011 53 1
  • Multishot Targeted PROPELLER Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jie Deng, Andrew C. Larson
    Investigative Radiology 2009 44 8
  • Normal Anatomy of Cranial Nerves III–XII on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hyung-Jin Kim, Minjung Seong, Yikyung Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2020 81 3
  • Comparison of FSE T2 W PROPELLER and 3D–FIESTA of 3 T MR for the internal auditory canal
    Hai-bo Wu, Hui-shu Yuan, Furong Ma, Qiang Zhao
    Clinical Imaging 2017 45
  • Imagerie anatomique des nerfs crâniens
    M. Hermier, P.R.L. Leal, S.F. Salaris, J.-C. Froment, M. Sindou
    Neurochirurgie 2009 55 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire