Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticlePEDIATRICS

In Vivo T1 of Blood Measurements in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Improve Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification from Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI

L. Václavů, V. van der Land, D.F.R. Heijtel, M.J.P. van Osch, M.H. Cnossen, C.B.L.M. Majoie, A. Bush, J.C. Wood, K.J. Fijnvandraat, H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts and A.J. Nederveen
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2016, 37 (9) 1727-1732; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4793
L. Václavů
aFrom the Department of Radiology (L.V., D.F.R.H., C.B.L.M.M., H.J.M.M.M., A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Václavů
V. van der Land
bDepartment of Pediatric Hematology (V.v.d.L., K.J.F.), Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. van der Land
D.F.R. Heijtel
aFrom the Department of Radiology (L.V., D.F.R.H., C.B.L.M.M., H.J.M.M.M., A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.F.R. Heijtel
M.J.P. van Osch
cC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI (M.J.P.v.O.), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.J.P. van Osch
M.H. Cnossen
dDepartment of Pediatric Hematology (M.H.C.), Erasmus University Medical Center–Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.H. Cnossen
C.B.L.M. Majoie
aFrom the Department of Radiology (L.V., D.F.R.H., C.B.L.M.M., H.J.M.M.M., A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.B.L.M. Majoie
A. Bush
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.), Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Bush
J.C. Wood
fDepartment of Pediatrics (J.C.W.), Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.C. Wood
K.J. Fijnvandraat
bDepartment of Pediatric Hematology (V.v.d.L., K.J.F.), Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K.J. Fijnvandraat
H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts
aFrom the Department of Radiology (L.V., D.F.R.H., C.B.L.M.M., H.J.M.M.M., A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
gSunnybrook Research Institute (H.J.M.M.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts
A.J. Nederveen
aFrom the Department of Radiology (L.V., D.F.R.H., C.B.L.M.M., H.J.M.M.M., A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.J. Nederveen
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Children with sickle cell disease have low hematocrit and elevated CBF, the latter of which can be assessed with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. Quantitative CBF values are obtained by using an estimation of the longitudinal relaxation time of blood (T1blood). Because T1blood depends on hematocrit in healthy individuals, we investigated the importance of measuring T1blood in vivo with MR imaging versus calculating it from hematocrit or assuming an adult fixed value recommended by the literature, hypothesizing that measured T1blood would be the most suited for CBF quantification in children with sickle cell disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four approaches for T1blood estimation were investigated in 39 patients with sickle cell disease and subsequently used in the CBF quantification from arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. First, we used 1650 ms as recommended by the literature (T1blood-fixed); second, T1blood calculated from hematocrit measured in patients (T1blood-hematocrit); third, T1blood measured in vivo with a Look-Locker MR imaging sequence (T1blood-measured); and finally, a mean value from T1blood measured in this study in children with sickle cell disease (T1blood–sickle cell disease). Quantitative flow measurements acquired with phase-contrast MR imaging served as reference values for CBF.

RESULTS: T1blood-measured (1818 ± 107 ms) was higher than the literature recommended value of 1650 ms, was significantly lower than T1blood-hematocrit (2058 ± 123 ms, P < .001), and, most interesting, did not correlate with hematocrit measurements. Use of either T1blood-measured or T1blood–sickle cell disease provided the best agreement on CBF between arterial-spin labeling and phase-contrast MR imaging reference values.

CONCLUSIONS: This work advocates the use of patient-specific measured T1blood or a standardized value (1818 ms) in the quantification of CBF from arterial spin-labeling in children with SCD.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ASL
arterial spin-labeling
Hct
hematocrit
pCASL
pseudocontinuous ASL
PC-MRI
phase-contrast MR imaging
SCD
sickle cell disease
T1blood
longitudinal relaxation time of blood

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with a considerable risk of stroke,1 which is reduced by blood transfusion therapy2 and identified by screening blood flow velocities in intracranial arteries with transcranial Doppler.3 Additionally, microvascular tissue perfusion, or CBF, is also increased in patients with SCD4,5; which is related to low hematocrit (Hct).6,7 CBF measurements are instrumental in understanding the pathophysiology of impaired perfusion in the occurrence of silent cerebral infarcts in SCD.4,8,9 Noninvasive CBF measurements can be performed with arterial spin-labeling (ASL) and a quantification model to calculate physiological CBF values. The wide range of CBF values reported in the literature in SCD1,4,9 emphasizes the need for either more accurate estimates or direct measurements of the often-assumed parameters required for CBF quantification models.

The longitudinal relaxation time of the blood (T1blood) parameter accounts for the decay of the ASL signal with time, and inaccurate estimates of T1blood could result in over- or underestimation of CBF.10⇓–12 For healthy adults, with a stable Hct, a fixed T1blood value of 1650 ms is recommended for CBF quantification from pseudocontinuous ASL (pCASL) at 3T.13,14 T1blood is inversely correlated with Hct,10,13,15⇓⇓⇓–19 and a linear relationship has been proposed in the literature permitting the calculation of T1blood from measured Hct values.12,13,16 While Hct ranges from 38% to 45% in healthy children,20 it is as low as 18%–30% in children with SCD.21 Hence, if measured Hct values are available, T1blood can be derived accordingly. However, recent studies suggest that T1blood may additionally differ in children with SCD.12,22,23

Owing to recent developments in MR imaging, direct measurements of the inversion recovery of T1blood are now possible by combining a global inversion pulse and a subsequent section-selective Look-Locker readout in the sagittal sinus.16,17 Patient-specific, in vivo T1blood measurements are noninvasive, robust, and fast, making them preferable to calculating T1blood from blood samples. Our first hypothesis was that in vivo–measured T1blood would be higher in children with SCD than the adult reference value of 1650 ms due to anemia. We also considered that conformational changes inherent to sickle red blood cells may produce additional unforeseen changes in T1blood.12 We investigated the importance of measuring patient-specific differences in T1blood for the accuracy of ASL quantification in patients with SCD. We hypothesized that patient-specific T1blood values acquired in vivo would improve CBF quantification in SCD compared with CBF quantification with T1blood calculated from Hct or T1blood-fixed at 1650 ms.

The aim of this study was to determine which of the following 4 T1blood derivatives would provide the best CBF quantification compared with quantitative reference CBF values measured with 2D phase-contrast MR imaging (PC-MRI): 1) literature-recommended adult T1blood of 1650 ms,14 2) T1blood calculated from Hct, 3) in vivo–measured T1blood, or 4) a fixed average SCD value from the mean T1blood measured in vivo in this study.

Materials and Methods

Experiments were performed according to principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study was approved by the local institutional review board at the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Patients

Eligible children were approached prospectively from 2 outpatient clinics as described previously.24 Informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians and children older than 12 years of age. Inclusion criteria were HbSS or HbSβ0 genotypes and 8–17 years of age. Exclusion criteria were a history of stroke, stenosis of the intracranial arteries and velocity of >155 cm/s on transcranial Doppler imaging, current chronic blood transfusion therapy, bone marrow transplant, MR imaging contraindications, and major concomitant health problems. Patients were in a steady-state of SCD, without evidence of infection or sickle cell crisis up to 1 month before participation.

Hematocrit

Venous blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein on the day of the MR imaging assessment and processed according to standard procedures in the hospital laboratory. Hct values were used to calculate T1blood-Hct values.

MR Imaging Acquisition

Thirty-two children underwent 3T imaging on an Intera scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with an 8-channel head coil, and due to a scanner upgrade, the remaining 8 children were scanned at 3T on an Ingenia (Philips Healthcare) with a 15-channel head coil. The protocol included 3D-TOF MRA, 2D T2-weighted, T1blood, 2D pseudocontinuous ASL, and 2D phase-contrast sequences.

The T1blood acquisition section was planned perpendicular to the posterior sagittal sinus16 and comprised a multi time-point inversion recovery experiment. This technique uses a global inversion pulse followed by a series of 95° section-selective readout pulses, which are intended to saturate the tissue surrounding the sinus. Assuming complete replenishment of inverted blood between 2 consecutive pulses, a high contrast is achieved between tissue and blood, allowing the detection of the inversion recovery of blood. A nonselective adiabatic 180° inversion pulse (hyperbolic secant pulse, B1 value/duration of the pulse = 13.5 mT/13 ms) preceded a single section Look-Locker EPI readout (flip angle, 95°; voxel size, 1.5 × 1.5 mm; matrix, 240 × 240 mm; section thickness, 2 mm; TE/TR, 15/10,000 ms; TI1, 200 ms; ΔTI, 150 ms; 60 readouts; 6 signal averages; scan duration, 1 minute 20 seconds).

A gradient-echo single-shot EPI pCASL sequence was used to acquire perfusion-weighted images (75 subtracted label-control pairs; resolution, 3 × 3 × 7 mm; FOV, 240 × 240 mm; 17 continuous axial sections; TE/TR, 17/4000 ms; flip angle, 90°; labeling duration, 1650 ms; postlabeling delay, 1525 ms; background suppression, 1680 and 2830 ms after a prelabeling saturation pulse; scan duration, 10 minutes 7 seconds).

Quantitative flow measurements were obtained with a nontriggered 2D single-section PC-MRI acquisition in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Imaging parameters were the following: FOV, 230 × 230 mm; voxel size, 0.45 × 0.45 mm; TR/TE, 15/5 ms; flip angle, 15°; maximum velocity-encoding, 140 cm/s; section thickness, 4 mm; scan duration, 1 minute.

Data Postprocessing

T1blood.

Blood-filled voxels within the sagittal sinus were selected on the basis of the highest signal intensity. Voxel values were subsequently averaged, and the data were fitted to a 3-parameter model (Nealder-Mead method; MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts), with the parameters M0, Offset, and T1blood,17 and solved for T1blood: Embedded Image where M models the T1 recovery from the data, nTI is the readout number, abs denotes the absolute values, M0 is the net magnetization, “Offset” accounts for imperfect inversion, TI1 is 200 ms, and ΔTI is the sampling interval (150 ms). The sum of squared errors of the final (optimal) iteration after solving the Nealder-Mead function indicated how well the data fitted the model and served as a quality check.

Cerebral Blood Flow.

Raw pCASL data were processed as described previously25 by using a processing pipeline for the registration and quantification of the data. A 2-compartment quantification model was used, as published in detail previously9,26 (except that the equilibrium magnetization of arterial blood was derived from the M0 of CSF multiplied by the blood-water partition coefficient,27 and labeling efficiency was 0.7). The T1blood parameter was adjusted for each CBF quantification as follows: first, adult fixed T1blood of 1650 ms taken from literature13; second, patient-specific Hct-calculated T1blood values16; third, patient-specific in vivo–measured T1blood values; and finally an average T1blood value obtained from the mean of in vivo T1blood measurements in our patients with SCD. T1blood-Hct was calculated per patient according to the relationship proposed by Varela et al16 derived from venous blood in neonates: Embedded Image

PC-MRI.

The internal carotid and vertebral arteries were segmented manually from phase difference images by using ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org) to obtain total flow (milliliters per minute). Total flow was then divided by brain mass (gram), which was calculated from the product of the volume (estimated from segmented anatomic images in SPM8; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12) and an assumed brain density of 1.05 g/L,28 to obtain PC-MRI CBF in milliliters/100 g/min,29 which served as the reference value for CBF.22,29

Statistical Analysis

A Pearson correlation was performed between T1blood-measured and Hct. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test the statistical significance of the differences among the 5 CBF quantification methods: 1) CBF (T1blood-fixed at 1650 ms), 2) CBF (T1blood-Hct), 3) CBF (T1blood-measured in vivo, 4) CBF (T1blood-SCD fixed at the average measured value), and 5) PC-MRI reference CBF. Paired t tests were used to test the statistical significance of individual group differences post hoc. Agreement between PC-MRI and the 4 ASL methods was investigated with linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts). Linear regression analysis was performed to show agreement between PC-MRI and the 4 CBF quantification methods from ASL. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to indicate the bias corresponding to over- or underestimation of the ASL CBF method compared with the PC-MRI method. The limits of agreement (dotted lines) indicate the 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. One patient's T1blood scan was discarded due to poor image quality, so the mean CBF values from pCASL are based on 39 datasets. For PC-MRI, only 33 datasets were of sufficient quality to quantify reference CBF.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Measured T1blood

The mean Hct was 23% ± 3% for 39 children. The mean T1blood-measured value was 1818 ± 107 ms, which was significantly lower than mean T1blood-Hct values (2045 ± 69 ms; paired t test, P < .001) but higher compared to the fixed adult value of 1650 ms. T1blood-measured was not significantly different between scanners (t test, P = .94). Figure 1A shows a representative inversion recovery curve from 1 patient as a function of the sum of least-squares fit. The sum of squared errors from fitting the T1blood-measured values to the model is shown in On-line Fig 1. T1blood-measured values did not correlate with Hct values measured from blood samples (r = 0.02, P = .89; Fig 1B) or with age (r = 0.03, P = .85) and did not differ significantly between males and females (t test, P = .37).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, Representative inversion recovery of the venous T1blood signal acquired in the sagittal sinus in a child with sickle cell disease. B, In vivo–measured T1blood values are significantly lower than Hct-derived T1blood values. T1blood-measured does not correlate with patient hematocrit (mean Hct, 23% ± 3%) (Pearson r = 0.02, P = .89; n = 39).

Cerebral Blood Flow

Four CBF quantification methods were compared with PC-MRI CBF, the results of which are summarized in Table 2. Linear regression analyses between PC-MRI and pCASL CBF are shown in the left panel of Fig 2 and reveal slopes significantly different from zero for all CBF quantifications except for the T1blood-Hct CBF quantification. The Bland-Altman plots in the right panel of Fig 2 show the bias and limits of agreement for the mean and the difference between the measurements. T1blood-fixed overestimated CBF and T1blood-Hct underestimated CBF, while the individual in vivo T1blood-measured values and mean T1blood-SCD value provided the best agreement with PC-MRI values, both on an absolute level, revealed by no significant difference between PC-MRI and CBF in the repeated-measures ANOVA analysis (Table 2), but also on a one-to-one basis, as demonstrated in the linear regression plots (Fig 2). A representative example of CBF maps quantified with T1blood-measured from 2 patients is shown in Fig 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

T1blood values and corresponding CBF values quantified from ASLa

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Linear regression and Bland-Altman plots between CBF values measured with PC-MRI and ASL, which was quantified by using 4 different T1blood values: a fixed literature value of 1650 ms (CBF T1blood-fixed) (A and B); T1blood calculated from hematocrit (CBF T1blood-Hct), T1 = 0.5*Hct+0.37 (C and D)16; in vivo–measured T1blood (CBF T1blood-measured) (E and F); and a fixed SCD value obtained from the mean of the in vivo–measured T1blood (CBF T1blood-SCD) (G and H). The left panel shows linear regressions (solid line), and the right panel shows the mean on the x-axis versus the difference on the y-axis between pCASL and PC-MRI CBF with limits of agreement (dotted lines above and below) (n = 33).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Axial brain sections showing CBF from 2 representative examples of 2 fourteen-year-old boys with SCD. The upper row shows a patient with low CBF and the lower row shows a patient with high CBF.

Discussion

We demonstrate that in vivo–measured venous T1blood values in children with SCD were higher than the literature-recommended 1650 ms, were not significantly correlated with measured Hct, and were lower than the Hct-derived values for T1blood. CBF quantified with in vivo–measured T1blood provided better agreement with PC-MRI reference measurements than CBF quantified with fixed adult T1blood and Hct-derived T1blood.

T1blood and Hematocrit

Previous literature suggests that healthy children 6–18 years of age (assuming a stable Hct of 40%–45%) have T1blood values between 1680 and 1880 ms.18 In this study, in patients with a much lower Hct than healthy children, we measured T1blood values closer to the upper range of the literature-reported T1blood values.18 Yet, our T1blood values were lower than expected, considering the low Hct values obtained from our patients' blood samples. It is unlikely that we underestimated T1blood due to sequence-related limitations because the Look-Locker T1 technique has previously provided robust results in the same ROI.16,17,27

Reports of T1blood values ranging from 1500 to 2100 ms follow a linear relationship with Hct between 23% and 50%.13,16,18 It is possible that we did not have sufficient precision to detect this inverse relationship in our dataset or that the range of Hct values was too narrow in our patients (17%–32%). Abnormalities in SCD blood, other than low Hct, may account for the incongruity between T1blood and Hct measured here. While we did not measure blood rheology, abnormalities such as decreased red blood cell deformability, increased aggregation, and increased viscosity have been demonstrated consistently.21,30⇓⇓⇓–34 Furthermore, red blood cells in SCD exhibit different membrane properties and viscosity, which may have reduced T1blood due to shrinkage of cells and therefore lower water content.35

CBF Quantification

Our CBF results fall within the large range of reported values in children with SCD (∼70–150 mL/100 g/min).1,4,9,36,37 The necessary reliance on a quantification model for obtaining physiologically meaningful CBF values means that the method is sensitive to the assumptions of the model used, which could differ between healthy adults and children with SCD. The fact that measured T1blood ameliorates the CBF quantification but Hct-calculated T1blood does not opposes the use of Hct-corrected CBF quantification in SCD and, instead, advocates the use of measured T1blood. T1blood measurements are advantageous over Hct-calculated T1blood because they are faster (1 minute 20 seconds) and less invasive. In the absence of T1blood measurements, we propose using a mean value of 1818 ms, as measured in this study in children with SCD, which would suffice in improving the absolute agreement with PC-MRI for CBF quantification from ASL.

Limitations

This study should be considered in light of the technical limitations of the T1blood measurement and the potentially inaccurate reference flow measurements from PCMR.

Whereas T1blood measurements were acquired in venous blood, the quantification model requires arterial estimates. However, because we compared venous T1blood measurements with T1blood values derived from venous Hct, the potential mismatch would have been similar for both methods. Moreover, we demonstrate that the measured venous T1blood, used to quantify CBF, improved the agreement with independently acquired flow measurements in arterial vessels with PC-MRI, which shows that although the arterial measurement may be better, the venous measurement is sufficient.

PC-MRI as a surrogate for CBF could be critiqued for CBF overestimation due to partial volume effects38 and inaccurate brain density estimates or underestimated flow due to noncardiac-triggered acquisition. Still, recent literature suggests that errors in flow values associated with nontriggered 2D PC-MRI are <3% compared with triggered acquisitions.29,39 Despite these limitations, a recent study has shown high agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73) between PC-MRI and pCASL,40 emphasizing that PC-MRI is currently the best noninvasive reference for pCASL CBF.

Conclusions

Inaccurate T1blood estimates can be a major confounder for quantitative perfusion assessment from ASL. Patient-specific, in vivo–measured T1blood measurements provided more accurate CBF values than T1blood derived from Hct values. To avoid overestimation of CBF in SCD, we recommend the use of a fixed value of 1818 ms (T1blood-SCD) for CBF quantification from ASL in SCD if measured T1blood values are not available.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participants and the medical and technical staff who helped with recruitment, scanning, and blood measurements.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Lena Václavů—RELATED: Grant: Fonds NutsOhra (grant from Dutch Sickle Cell Research Foundation).* Dennis F.R. Heijtel—UNRELATED: Employment: Philips Healthcare (currently employed). Matthias J.P. van Osch—UNRELATED: Employment: Philips Healthcare; Patents (planned, pending or issued): joint patent with Philips Healthcare* and a joint patent with the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (Melbourne, Australia) and Lund University (Sweden),* both pending; Other: research support by Philips Healthcare.* Charles B.L.M. Majoie—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Stryker.* John C. Wood—UNRELATED: Consultancy: BioMed Informatics, ApoPharma, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Celgene, WorldCare Clinical; Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health (1U01HL117718–01 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute),* National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01DK097115–01A1)*; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: American Society of Hematology; Other: Philips Healthcare,* Comments: Work-in-Kind—Philips provided technical expertise, pulse sequences, and engineering staff and we have tested new MRI techniques, product feedback, and academic productivity (abstracts and papers). *Money paid to the institution.

  • Patients were recruited and scanned by V.v.d.L., H.J.M.M.M., and D.F.R.H.; the study was designed by K.J.F. and A.J.N. The data were analyzed by L.V. and H.J.M.M.M, and the final manuscript was drafted, reviewed, and edited by all authors.

  • This work was funded by the Dutch NutsOhra Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (grant 1303-055).

  • Paper previously presented, in part, at: Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Benelux, January 16, 2015; Ghent, Belgium.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Helton KJ,
    2. Adams RJ,
    3. Kesler KL, et al
    ; SWiTCH Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging/angiography and transcranial Doppler velocities in sickle cell anemia: results from the SWiTCH trial. Blood 2014;124:891–98 doi:10.1182/blood-2013-12-545186 pmid:24914136
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Adams RJ,
    2. McKie VC,
    3. Hsu L, et al
    . Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1998;339:5–11 doi:10.1056/NEJM199807023390102 pmid:9647873
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arkuszewski M,
    2. Krejza J,
    3. Chen R, et al
    . Sickle cell disease: reference values and interhemispheric differences of nonimaging transcranial Doppler blood flow parameters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1444–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2529 pmid:21700785
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Oguz K,
    2. Golay X,
    3. Pizzini FB, et al
    . Sickle cell disease: continuous arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging in children. Radiology 2003;227:567–74 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272020903 pmid:12663827
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Arkuszewski M,
    2. Krejza J,
    3. Chen R, et al
    . Sickle cell anemia: reference values of cerebral blood flow determined by continuous arterial spin labeling MRI. Neuroradiol J 2013;26:191–200 doi:10.1177/197140091302600209 pmid:23859242
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Prohovnik I,
    2. Hurlet-Jensen A,
    3. Adams R, et al
    . Hemodynamic etiology of elevated flow velocity and stroke in sickle-cell disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29:803–10 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.6 pmid:19209182
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Doepp F,
    2. Kebelmann-Betzing C,
    3. Kivi A, et al
    . Stenosis or hyperperfusion in sickle cell disease: ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38:1333–38 doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.003 pmid:22698503
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Helton KJ,
    2. Glass JO,
    3. Reddick WE, et al
    . Comparing segmented ASL perfusion of vascular territories using manual versus semiautomated techniques in children with sickle cell anemia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:439–46 doi:10.1002/jmri.24559 pmid:24920128
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gevers S,
    2. Nederveen AJ,
    3. Fijnvandraat K, et al
    . Arterial spin labeling measurement of cerebral perfusion in children with sickle cell disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:779–87 doi:10.1002/jmri.23505 pmid:22095695
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Varela M,
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Golay X, et al
    . Cerebral blood flow measurements in infants using look-locker arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1591–600 doi:10.1002/jmri.24716 pmid:25143014
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wu WC,
    2. St Lawrence KS,
    3. Licht DJ, et al
    . Quantification issues in arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2010;21:65–73 doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e31821e570a pmid:21613872
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hales PW,
    2. Kirkham FJ,
    3. Clark CA
    . A general model to calculate the spin-lattice (T1) relaxation time of blood, accounting for haematocrit, oxygen saturation and magnetic field strength. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:370–74 doi:10.1177/0271678X15605856 pmid:26661147
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lu H,
    2. Clingman C,
    3. Golay X, et al
    . Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:679–82 doi:10.1002/mrm.20178 pmid:15334591
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Alsop DC,
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Golay X, et al
    . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. De Vis JB,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Groenendaal F, et al
    . Impact of neonate haematocrit variability on the longitudinal relaxation time of blood: implications for arterial spin labelling MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2014;4:517–25 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.006 pmid:24818078
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Varela M,
    2. Hajnal JV,
    3. Petersen ET, et al
    . A method for rapid in vivo measurement of blood T1. NMR Biomed 2011;24:80–88 doi:10.1002/nbm.1559 pmid:20669148
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Ghariq E, et al
    . In vivo blood T(1) measurements at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:1082–86 doi:10.1002/mrm.24550 pmid:23172845
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wu WC,
    2. Jain V,
    3. Li C, et al
    . In vivo venous blood T1 measurement using inversion recovery true-FISP in children and adults. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:1140–47 doi:10.1002/mrm.22484 pmid:20564586
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Shimada K,
    2. Nagasaka T,
    3. Shidahara M, et al
    . In vivo measurement of longitudinal relaxation time of human blood by inversion-recovery fast gradient-echo MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Sci 2012;11:265–71 doi:10.2463/mrms.11.265 pmid:23269013
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hollowell J,
    2. van Assendelft O,
    3. Gunter E, et al
    . Hematological and iron-related analytes: reference data for persons aged 1 year and over: United States, 1988–94. Vital Health Stat 11 2005;247:1–156 pmid:15782774
    PubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tripette J,
    2. Alexy T,
    3. Hardy-Dessources M, et al
    . Red blood cell aggregation, aggregate strength and oxygen transport potential of blood are abnormal in both homozygous sickle cell anemia and sickle-hemoglobin C disease. Haematologica 2009;94:1060–65 doi:10.3324/haematol.2008.005371 pmid:19644138
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jain V,
    2. Duda J,
    3. Avants B, et al
    . Longitudinal reproducibility and accuracy of pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MR imaging in typically developing children. Radiology 2012;263:527–36 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111509 pmid:22517961
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hales PW,
    2. Kawadler JM,
    3. Aylett SE, et al
    . Arterial spin labeling characterization of cerebral perfusion during normal maturation from late childhood into adulthood: normal “reference range” values and their use in clinical studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34:776–84 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.17 pmid:24496173
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. van der Land V,
    2. Hijmans CT,
    3. de Ruiter M, et al
    . Volume of white matter hyperintensities is an independent predictor of intelligence quotient and processing speed in children with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2015;168:553–56 doi:10.1111/bjh.13179 pmid:25303108
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Zelaya FO, et al
    . Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: implications for multi-center studies. Neuroimage 2015;113:143–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.043 pmid:25818685
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Gevers S,
    2. Heijtel D,
    3. Ferns SP, et al
    . Cerebral perfusion long term after therapeutic occlusion of the internal carotid artery in patients who tolerated angiographic balloon test occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:329–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2776 pmid:22081677
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Heijtel DF,
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. Bakker E, et al
    . Accuracy and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion during baseline and hypercapnia: a head-to-head comparison with 15O H2O positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2014;92:182–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.011 pmid:24531046
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Herscovitch P,
    2. Raichle ME
    . What is the correct value for the brain–blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:65–69 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1985.9 pmid:3871783
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Aslan S,
    2. Xu F,
    3. Wang PL, et al
    . Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:765–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.22245 pmid:20187183
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Vent-Schmidt J,
    2. Waltz X,
    3. Romana M, et al
    . Blood thixotropy in patients with sickle cell anaemia: role of haematocrit and red blood cell rheological properties. PLoS One 2014;9:e114412 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114412 pmid:25502228
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Connes P,
    2. Coates TD
    . Autonomic nervous system dysfunction: implication in sickle cell disease. C R Biol 2013;336:142–47 doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2012.09.003 pmid:23643396
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Brandão MM,
    2. Fontes A,
    3. Barjas-Castro ML, et al
    . Optical tweezers for measuring red blood cell elasticity: application to the study of drug response in sickle cell disease. Eur J Haematol 2003;70:207–11 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00027.x pmid:12656742
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hebbel RP,
    2. Yamada O,
    3. Moldow CF, et al
    . Abnormal adherence of sickle erythrocytes to cultured vascular endothelium: possible mechanism for microvascular occlusion in sickle cell disease. J Clin Invest 1980;65:154–60 doi:10.1172/JCI109646 pmid:7350195
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Prengler M,
    2. Pavlakis SG,
    3. Prohovnik I, et al
    . Sickle cell disease: the neurological complications. Ann Neurol 2002;51:543–52 doi:10.1002/ana.10192 pmid:12112099
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kiihne S,
    2. Bryant RG
    . Protein-bound water molecule counting by resolution of (1)H spin-lattice relaxation mechanisms. Biophys J 2000;78:2163–69 doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76763-4 pmid:10733994
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Strouse JJ,
    2. Cox CS,
    3. Melhem ER, et al
    . Inverse correlation between cerebral blood flow measured by continuous arterial spin-labeling (CASL) MRI and neurocognitive function in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). Blood 2006;108:379–81 doi:10.1182/blood-2005-10-4029 pmid:16537809
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. van den Tweel XW,
    2. Nederveen AJ,
    3. Majoie CB, et al
    . Cerebral blood flow measurement in children with sickle cell disease using continuous arterial spin labeling at 3.0-Tesla MRI. Stroke 2009;40:795–800 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523308 pmid:19150876
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Lotz J,
    2. Meier C,
    3. Leppert A, et al
    . Measurement with imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651–71 doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651 pmid:12006694
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Spilt A,
    2. Box FM,
    3. van der Geest RJ, et al
    . Reproducibility of total cerebral blood flow measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:1–5 doi:10.1002/jmri.10133 pmid:12112496
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Ambarki K,
    2. Wahlin A,
    3. Zarrinkoob L, et al
    . Accuracy of parenchymal cerebral blood flow measurements using pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling in healthy volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1816–21 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4367 pmid:26251434
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received December 15, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision February 24, 2016.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 9
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo T1 of Blood Measurements in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Improve Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification from Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
L. Václavů, V. van der Land, D.F.R. Heijtel, M.J.P. van Osch, M.H. Cnossen, C.B.L.M. Majoie, A. Bush, J.C. Wood, K.J. Fijnvandraat, H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts, A.J. Nederveen
In Vivo T1 of Blood Measurements in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Improve Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification from Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1727-1732; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4793

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vivo T1 of Blood Measurements in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Improve Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification from Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI
L. Václavů, V. van der Land, D.F.R. Heijtel, M.J.P. van Osch, M.H. Cnossen, C.B.L.M. Majoie, A. Bush, J.C. Wood, K.J. Fijnvandraat, H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts, A.J. Nederveen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016, 37 (9) 1727-1732; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4793
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • ExploreASL: an image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies
  • Hydroxyurea reduces cerebral metabolic stress in patients with sickle cell anemia
  • Hemodynamic provocation with acetazolamide shows impaired cerebrovascular reserve in adults with sickle cell disease
  • Cerebral Blood Flow and Marrow Diffusion Alterations in Children with Sickle Cell Anemia after Bone Marrow Transplantation and Transfusion
  • Red cell exchange transfusions lower cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction fraction in pediatric sickle cell anemia
  • Crossref (36)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • ExploreASL: An image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies
    Henk J.M.M. Mutsaerts, Jan Petr, Paul Groot, Pieter Vandemaele, Silvia Ingala, Andrew D. Robertson, Lena Václavů, Inge Groote, Hugo Kuijf, Fernando Zelaya, Owen O’Daly, Saima Hilal, Alle Meije Wink, Ilse Kant, Matthan W.A. Caan, Catherine Morgan, Jeroen de Bresser, Elisabeth Lysvik, Anouk Schrantee, Astrid Bjørnebekk, Patricia Clement, Zahra Shirzadi, Joost P.A. Kuijer, Viktor Wottschel, Udunna C. Anazodo, Dasja Pajkrt, Edo Richard, Reinoud P.H. Bokkers, Liesbeth Reneman, Mario Masellis, Matthias Günther, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Eric Achten, Michael A. Chappell, Matthias J.P. van Osch, Xavier Golay, David L. Thomas, Enrico De Vita, Atle Bjørnerud, Aart Nederveen, Jeroen Hendrikse, Iris Asllani, Frederik Barkhof
    NeuroImage 2020 219
  • Current state and guidance on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in clinical neuroimaging
    Thomas Lindner, Divya S. Bolar, Eric Achten, Frederik Barkhof, António J. Bastos‐Leite, John A. Detre, Xavier Golay, Matthias Günther, Danny J. J. Wang, Sven Haller, Silvia Ingala, Hans R. Jäger, Geon‐Ho Jahng, Meher R. Juttukonda, Vera C. Keil, Hirohiko Kimura, Mai‐Lan Ho, Maarten Lequin, Xin Lou, Jan Petr, Nandor Pinter, Francesca B. Pizzini, Marion Smits, Magdalena Sokolska, Greg Zaharchuk, Henk J. M. M. Mutsaerts
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2023 89 5
  • Advances in arterial spin labelling MRI methods for measuring perfusion and collateral flow
    Matthias JP van Osch, Wouter M Teeuwisse, Zhensen Chen, Yuriko Suzuki, Michael Helle, Sophie Schmid
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2018 38 9
  • Red cell exchange transfusions lower cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction fraction in pediatric sickle cell anemia
    Kristin P. Guilliams, Melanie E. Fields, Dustin K. Ragan, Cihat Eldeniz, Michael M. Binkley, Yasheng Chen, Liam S. Comiskey, Allan Doctor, Monica L. Hulbert, Joshua S. Shimony, Katie D. Vo, Robert C. McKinstry, Hongyu An, Jin-Moo Lee, Andria L. Ford
    Blood 2018 131 9
  • Neuroimaging of vascular reserve in patients with cerebrovascular diseases
    Meher R. Juttukonda, Manus J. Donahue
    NeuroImage 2019 187
  • Diminished cerebral oxygen extraction and metabolic rate in sickle cell disease using T2 relaxation under spin tagging MRI
    Adam M. Bush, Thomas D. Coates, John C. Wood
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018 80 1
  • Hydroxyurea reduces cerebral metabolic stress in patients with sickle cell anemia
    Melanie E. Fields, Kristin P. Guilliams, Dustin Ragan, Michael M. Binkley, Amy Mirro, Slim Fellah, Monica L. Hulbert, Morey Blinder, Cihat Eldeniz, Katie Vo, Joshua S. Shimony, Yasheng Chen, Robert C. McKinstry, Hongyu An, Jin-Moo Lee, Andria L. Ford
    Blood 2019 133 22
  • Cerebral hemodynamics and pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling considerations in adults with sickle cell anemia
    Meher R. Juttukonda, Lori C. Jordan, Melissa C. Gindville, Larry T. Davis, Jennifer M. Watchmaker, Sumit Pruthi, Manus J. Donahue
    NMR in Biomedicine 2017 30 2
  • White matter has impaired resting oxygen delivery in sickle cell patients
    Yaqiong Chai, Adam M. Bush, Julie Coloigner, Aart J. Nederveen, Benita Tamrazi, Chau Vu, Soyoung Choi, Thomas D. Coates, Natasha Lepore, John C. Wood
    American Journal of Hematology 2019 94 4
  • Cortical cerebral blood flow in ageing: effects of haematocrit, sex, ethnicity and diabetes
    Lorna A. Smith, Andrew Melbourne, David Owen, M. Jorge Cardoso, Carole H. Sudre, Therese Tillin, Magdalena Sokolska, David Atkinson, Nish Chaturvedi, Sebastien Ourselin, Alun D. Hughes, Frederik Barkhof, H. R. Jäger
    European Radiology 2019 29 10

More in this TOC Section

PEDIATRICS

  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT
  • SyMRI & MR Fingerprinting in Brainstem Myelination
  • Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome: Neuroimaging Findings
Show more PEDIATRICS

FUNCTIONAL

  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Perifocal Edema in Meningiomas&Brain Connectivity
Show more FUNCTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire