Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

OtherHEAD AND NECK

Fast Recovery 3D Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Inner Ear at 3 T

Shinji Naganawa, Tokiko Koshikawa, Hiroshi Fukatsu, Takeo Ishigaki, Ikuo Aoki and Ayako Ninomiya
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2002, 23 (2) 299-302;
Shinji Naganawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tokiko Koshikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Fukatsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeo Ishigaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ikuo Aoki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayako Ninomiya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: High-resolution MR imaging of the inner ear with a heavily T2-weighted 3D fast spin-echo sequence has been performed successfully at 1.5 T. However, at 3 T, the longer T1 time of CSF necessitates a longer TR, resulting in significantly prolonged imaging times. In this study, the fast recovery 3D fast spin-echo sequence, which permits the TR to be reduced while maintaining T2 contrast, was optimized at 3 T for imaging of the inner ear. The optimized sequence parameters are as follows: 1500/294 (TR/TE); echo spacing, 18.1 ms; bandwidth, 38 kHz at 512 readout; and imaging time, 13 minutes.

High-resolution MR imaging of the inner ear with a heavily T2-weighted 3D fast spin-echo sequence has been performed successfully at 1.5 T (1). However, at 3 T, it is difficult to apply an ultralong echo train length because of specific absorption rate limitations, and the longer T1 of CSF makes it necessary to use a longer TR, resulting in significant prolongation of imaging time. Recently, the fast recovery pulse has been introduced and has been found to perform well at 1.5 T in various applications (2–5). This makes it possible to reduce the TR while maintaining T2 contrast by applying the fast recovery pulse at the end of the echo train (6). The purpose of this study was to optimize the fast recovery 3D fast spin-echo sequence at 3 T for the imaging of the inner ear.

Methods

All imaging was performed with a 3-T whole-body MR imager (Medspec S300 with Paravision version 2.01 software; Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). This unit is equipped with a local head-gradient coil system (30 mT/m, slew rate of 200 mT/m/ms). A receive-and-transmit quadrature head coil was used. Sequence optimization was performed by using a polyvinyl alcohol phantom, which has T1 and T2 values similar to those of human brain tissue, a distilled water phantom, and four healthy volunteers.

The contrast-to-noise ratio between CSF and the cerebellum was measured at the level of the internal auditory canal. The specific absorption rate limitation for the head was set at 3 W/kg. The parameters below were varied to determine the optimal values.

Phantom Study

By using a TE of 294 ms and an echo spacing of 18.1 ms, the phantom was imaged with various TR values: 700, 900, 1100, 1300, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, and 4000 ms. The contrast-to-noise ratios between polyvinyl alcohol and distilled water in a given time were evaluated.

Volunteer Study

At a TR of 1500 ms, images were obtained of a volunteer, with and without a fast recovery pulse. The effective TE was set to 72, 144, 217, 294, 325, and 390 ms, with the TR set to 1500 ms. The receiver bandwidth was set to 38, 60, 84, 100, and 120 kHz at a TR of 1500 ms, a TE of 294 ms, and an echo spacing of 18.1 ms. The echo spacing was set to 18.1, 20, 22, 24, and 26 ms.

To ensure sufficient coverage of the inner ear apparatus bilaterally, a 5-cm-thick axial slab was obtained. The section thickness was 0.8 mm, the field of view was 16 × 14 cm, the matrix size was 512 × 256, the voxel size was 0.3 × 0.58 × 0.8 mm, and the echo train length was 32.

Results

Phantom Study

The contrast-to-noise ratio in a given time was plotted versus TR, as shown in Figure 1. The maximum contrast-to-noise ratio was obtained at a TR of 1500 ms.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratio between the polyvinyl alcohol phantom and water with various TR values. The highest contrast-to-noise ratio between polyvinyl alcohol and water was obtained at a TR of 1500 ms. A TE of 294 ms and an echo spacing of 18.1 ms were used in this experiment.

Volunteer Study

At a TR of 1500 ms, the contrast-to-noise ratios obtained in images with a fast recovery pulse were 1.69 times higher than those in images without a fast recovery pulse (Fig 2). A TR of 1500 ms, an echo spacing of 18.1 ms, and an effective TE of 294 ms, which was the center of the echo train length, provided images with the fewest artifacts (Fig 3). At a TR of 1500 ms, a TE of 294 ms, and an echo spacing of 18.1 ms, the minimum bandwidth of 38 kHz (which is the smallest value compatible with the spatial resolution stated above) provided the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (Fig 4). Longer echo train spacing allows the use of a narrower bandwidth, with the penalty of prolongation of the effective TE if the effective TE at the center of the echo train length is selected. At a TR of 1500 ms, the shortest echo spacing of 18.1 ms provided the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (Fig 5).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Comparison of images obtained with (left) and without (right) a fast recovery pulse in a volunteer. The contrast-to-noise ratio in the image with a fast recovery pulse is 41.1 and in the image without a fast recovery pulse is 24.3. This image was obtained with a TR of 1500 ms and a TE of 243.8 ms. The circles in the images indicate the regions of interest for CSF in the cistern and cerebellum.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Images with various TE values. Effective TE values were set at 72 (A), 144 (B), 217 (C), 294 (D), 325 (E), and 390 (F) ms. The TR was set at 1500 ms, and the echo spacing was set at 18.1 ms. The image with the effective TE of 294 ms, which was the center of the echo train length, provided the fewest ghost artifacts while maintaining a high contrast-to-noise ratio between neural tissue and CSF.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios at various bandwidths. The narrowest bandwidth compatible with the spatial resolution, an echo spacing of 18.1 ms, a TR of 1500 ms, and a TE of 294 ms, showed the highest contrast-to-noise ratios.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios at various echo spacing values. Wider echo spacing permits a narrower bandwidth, but the effective echo time is prolonged if the center of the echo train length is selected as the effective TE to prevent blurring and ghost artifacts. At a TR of 1500 ms, the highest contrast-to-noise ratio was obtained with an echo spacing of 18.1 ms and a bandwidth of 38 kHz.

As the final result, a TR of 1500 ms, a TE of 294 ms, an echo spacing of 18.1 ms, and a bandwidth of 38 kHz (512 readout) were selected as the optimized values. The imaging time was 12 minutes 48 seconds, with an echo train length of 32. Images obtained by using the above parameters are shown in Figure 6.

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Images obtained by using optimized parameters in a volunteer.

A, Magnified image of the labyrinth. Internal structures such as the osseous spiral lamina and modiolus are clearly visualized.

B, CSF in the prepontine cistern and cerebellopontine angle cistern shows high signal without significant signal loss.

Discussion

In this study, an echo train length of 32 was used, although 64 may also have been applicable if the specific absorption rate limitation had been cleared by reducing the flip angle of the refocusing pulses. The half-Fourier technique was not used in this study. The combination of 3D fast spin-echo and half-Fourier imaging has been proved to be successful at 1.5 T (7). These two points should be further investigated in the future.

Gradient-echo–based sequences, such as constructive interference in steady state (8), segment-interleaved motion-compensated acquisition in the steady state (9), and fully balanced steady state coherent (10) sequences, also are used for the imaging of the inner ear region. However, the specific absorption rate of these sequences may be higher than that of 3D fast spin-echo–based sequences (11), and susceptibility artifacts may be more pronounced at 3 T than at 1.5 T.

The development of dedicated surface coils for the inner ear region is also important. Surface coils are usually used only as receive coils, with transmission performed by the whole-body coil. Whole-body coil RF transmission is usually associated with an increase in the specific absorption rate, which may be significant at 3 T.

A future study comparing the images obtained at 1.5 T and at 3 T in terms of structure identification is of interest. The internal structures of the inner ear that were not visualized clearly enough at 1.5 T (12) are expected to be visualized more clearly at 3 T.

Conclusion

The combination of a fast recovery pulse and 3D fast spin-echo permits high-resolution MR cisternography of the inner ear to be performed with a clinically acceptable imaging time, even at 3 T. The application of a longer echo train length and the half-Fourier technique holds promise for future improvements.

References

  1. ↵
    Naganawa S, Ito T, Fukatsu H, et al. MR imaging of the inner ear: comparison of a three-dimensional fast spin-echo sequence with use of a dedicated quadrature-surface coil with a gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-recalled sequence. Radiology 1998;208:679–685
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Isogai S, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Kinematic MRI using short TR fast recovery single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) in evaluating swallowing. Proc ISMRM 2000;1120
  3. Cheng D, Thibodeau S, Tan S, Tempany CM. Comparison of fast recovery fast spin echo and conventional fast spin echo for T2-weighted imaging of the prostate gland. Proc ISMRM 2000;1436
  4. Katayama M, Masui T, Kobayashi S, Ito T, et al. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin-echo, breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo and breath-hold fast-recovery fast spin-echo sequences. Proc ISMRM 2001;235
  5. ↵
    Contreras M, Sica GT, Zou KH, et al. T2-weighted MRI of the liver: comparison of fast recovery fast spin echo and single shot fast spin echo sequences. Proc ISMRM 2001;2021
  6. ↵
    Kurucay S, Tan SG, Tanenbaum LN. High resolution inner ear imaging with a fast recovery 3D fast spin echo sequence. Proc ISMRM 1999;976
  7. ↵
    Iwayama E, Naganawa S, Ito T, et al. High-resolution MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: 2D versus 3D fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:889–895
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, Ampe W, Dehaene I, Meeus L. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:54–57
  9. ↵
    Kurucay S, Schmalbrock P, Chakeres DW, Keller PJ. A segment-interleaved motion-compensated acquisition in the steady state (SIMCAST) technique for high resolution imaging of the inner ear. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:1060–1068
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Vu AT. High-resolution inner ear imaging using 3D asymmetric fully-balanced steady state coherent imaging pulse sequence. Proc ISMRM 2001;1613
  11. ↵
    Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Fukuta T. MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1179–1185
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Ito T, Naganawa S, Fukatsu H, et al. High-resolution MR images of inner ear internal anatomy using a local gradient coil at 1.5 tesla: correlation with histological specimen. Radiat Med 1999;17:343–347
    PubMed
  • Received June 15, 2001.
  • Accepted after revision August 3, 2001.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 23 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 23, Issue 2
1 Feb 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fast Recovery 3D Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Inner Ear at 3 T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Shinji Naganawa, Tokiko Koshikawa, Hiroshi Fukatsu, Takeo Ishigaki, Ikuo Aoki, Ayako Ninomiya
Fast Recovery 3D Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Inner Ear at 3 T
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2002, 23 (2) 299-302;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Fast Recovery 3D Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging of the Inner Ear at 3 T
Shinji Naganawa, Tokiko Koshikawa, Hiroshi Fukatsu, Takeo Ishigaki, Ikuo Aoki, Ayako Ninomiya
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2002, 23 (2) 299-302;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Identification of the Nervus Intermedius Using 3T MR Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more Head and Neck

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire