Susceptibility-Based Imaging of Glioblastoma Microvascularity at 8 T: Correlation of MR Imaging and Postmortem Pathology

References

1. ↵
   Kleihues P, Burger PC, Plate KH, Ohgaki H, Cavanee WK. Glioblastoma. In: Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer;1997 :22
2. ↵
   Brem S, Cotran R, Folkman J Tumor angiogenesis: A quantitative method for histologic grading. J Nat Cancer Inst 1972;48:347–356
3. ↵
   Robitaille PM, Warner R, Jagadeesh J. Design and assembly of an 8 Tesla whole body MRI scanner. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1999;23:808–820

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. Weidner N. Tumoral vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancer patients: the evidence continues to grow. J Pathol 1998;184:119–122

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Fox SB. Tumour angiogenesis and prognosis. Histopathology 1997;30:294–301

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Eberhard A, Kahlert S, Goede V, Hemmerlein B, Plate KH, Augustin HG. Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies. Cancer Res 2000;60:1388–1393

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Vaughan JT, Hetherington HP, Out JO, Pan JW, Pohost GM. High frequency volume coils for clinical NMR imaging and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:206–218

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Abramovich R, Frenkiel D, Neeman M. Analysis of subcutaneous angiogenesis by gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:813–824

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Abramovich R, Marikovsky M, Meir G, Neeman M. Stimulation of tumour angiogenesis by proximal wound: spatial and temporal analysis by MRI. Br J Cancer 1998;77:440–447

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Abramovich R, Meir G, Neeman M. Neovascularization induced growth of implanted C6 glioma multicellular spheroids: magnetic resonance microimaging. Cancer Res 1995;55:1956–1962

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Burgess RE, Yu Y, Christoforidis GA. Human Leptomeningeal and cortical vascular anatomy of the cerebral cortex at 8 Tesla. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1999;23:850–856

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Abduljalil AM, Kangarlu A, Yu Y, Robitaille PML. Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI, II: acquisition of spin echo images from the human head. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:842–844

    PubMed
13. Chen CN, Sank VJ, Cohen SM, Hoult DI. The field dependence of NMR imaging, I: Laboratory assessment of signal-to-noise ratio and power deposition. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:722–729

    CrossRefPubMed
14. Collins CM, Smith MB. Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90 degrees ” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:684–691

    CrossRefPubMed
15. Cremillieux Y, Ding S, Dunn JF. High-resolution in vivo measurements of transverse relaxation times in rats at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:285–290

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. Hoult DI, Phil D. Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment, J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:46–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. Vaughan JT, Garwood M, Collins CM. 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:24–30.

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Christoforidis GA, Grecula JC, Newton HB. Visualization of microvascularity within glioblastoma multiforme utilizing 8 Tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1553–1556

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Abduljalil AM, Robitaille PML. Macroscopic susceptibility In ultra high field MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:832–841

    CrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    Christoforidis GA, Bourekas EC, Baujan M. High resolution MRI of the deep brain vascular anatomy at 8 Tesla: susceptibility-based enhancement of the venous structures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:857–866

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Burger PC, Vogel FS, Green SB, Strike TA. Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytomas: pathologic criteria and prognostic implications. Cancer 1985;56:1106–1111

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Daumas-Duport C, Scheihauer B, O’Fallon J, Kelly P. Grading of astrocytomas: a simple and reproducible method. Cancer 1988;62:2152–2165

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Deane BR, Lantos PL. The vasculature of experimental brain tumours, I: A sequential light and electron microscope study of angiogenesis. J Neurol Sci 1981;49:55–66

    CrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    Zama A, Tamura M, Inoue H. Three-dimensional observations on microvascular growth in rat glioma using a vascular casting method. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1991;117:396–402

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Dewhirst MW, Tso CY, Oliver R, Gustafson CS, Secomb TW, Gross JF. Morphologic and hemodynamic comparison of tumor and healing normal tissue microvasculature. Intl J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:91–99

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Neeman M. Preclinical MRI experience in imaging angiogenesis. Cancer Met Rev 2000;19:39–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility pertubations. Magn Res Med 1995;35:555–566
28. Essig M, Reichenbach JR, Schad LR, Schoenberg SO, Debus J, Kaiser WA. High-resolution MR venography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1417–1425

    CrossRefPubMed
29. Reichenbach JR, Essig M, Haacke EM. High-resolution venography of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA 1998 :6:62–69
30. Reichenbach JR, Barth M, Haacke EM, Klarhofer M, Kaiser WA, Moser E. High-resolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:949–957

    CrossRefPubMed
31. ↵
    Reichenbach JR, Jonetz-Mentzel L, Fitzek C. High-resolution blood oxygen-level dependent MR venography (HRBV): a new technique. Neuroradiology 2001;43:364–369

    CrossRefPubMed