Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Phase-Sensitive T1 Inversion Recovery Imaging: A Time-Efficient Interleaved Technique for Improved Tissue Contrast in Neuroimaging

Ping Hou, Khader M. Hasan, Clark W. Sitton, Jerry S. Wolinsky and Ponnada A. Narayana
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2005, 26 (6) 1432-1438;
Ping Hou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khader M. Hasan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clark W. Sitton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerry S. Wolinsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ponnada A. Narayana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Behavior of longitudinal magnetization as a function of inversion time before the application of the read-out sequence. The parameters used in these simulations are TR, 2250 milliseconds; T1WM, 600 milliseconds; T1GM, 920 milliseconds; and T1CSF, 4200 milliseconds.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Timing diagram of the T1IR sequence. In this diagram, the number of sections packed in one TI is 3, and the maximum number of sections covered in one TR is 7. The upper part shows the interleaved scheme, and the lower part shows how the IR and FSE integrate tightly in timing. Tmin is the time of IR, crusher gradient (in the phase encoding direction) and the FSE acquisition time. If the number of sections packed in the TI is less than the maximum sections allowed, there is a delay time added between crusher gradient and the FSE, and Tmin stays the same.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Axial images at two different locations of a normal volunteer acquired with three different sequences. The acquisition parameters for all the three sequences are: number of sections, 42; section thickness, 3.0 mm; gap, 0.0 mm; FOV, 24 cm × 24 cm; acquisition matrix, 256 × 192; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz; NEX, 1.

    A and D, PS-T1IR: TE, 11.5 milliseconds; TR, 2250 milliseconds; TI, 430 milliseconds; scan time = 2 min 33 s.

    B and E, T1FLAIR: TE, 11.5 milliseconds; TR, 2250 milliseconds; TI, 977 milliseconds; scan time, 2 min 38 s.

    C and F, T1SE: TE, 14 milliseconds; TR, 500 milliseconds; scan time, 3 min 28 s. The PS-T1IR demonstrates excellent GM-WM contrast and CSF is totally black, as predicted from theoretical simulation in Figure 1. The superior GM-WM contrast observed with the PS-T1IR sequence relative to the T1FLAIR and T1SE sequences can easily be appreciated on these figures.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Images from an 8-year-old patient with inflammatory demyelination. PS-T1IR (A) displays much better GM-WM contrast than does regular T1SE (B) and better contrast between diseased areas of WM and normal-appearing ones (sparing of U-fibers is easily seen) with shorter scan time.

    A, PS-T1IR: 256 × 192; 21 sections; FOV, 24 cm; TE, 11.5 milliseconds; TR, 2250 milliseconds; TI, 430 milliseconds; NEX, 1; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz; section thickness, 5.0 mm; gap, 2.5 mm; scan time, 1:25 minutes.

    B, T1SE: 256 × 192; 21 sections; FOV, 24 cm; TE, 14 milliseconds; TR, 500 milliseconds; NEX, 2; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz; section thickness, 5.0 mm; gap, 2.5 mm; scan time, 2:28 minutes.

    C, T2 FLAIR: FOV, 24 cm; 256 × 160; 21 sections; TE, 147 milliseconds; TR, 8800 milliseconds; TI, 2200 milliseconds; NEX, 1; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz; section thickness, 5.0 mm; gap, 2.5 mm; scan time, 3:32 minutes. Note that the section location does not match perfectly, because of patient movement between scans.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Axial images obtained in a patient with multiple cerebral abscesses.

    A, Several well-circumscribed mass lesions with perilesional edema are seen on the T2 FLAIR images (FOV, 24 cm; 256 × 160; 20 sections; TE, 147 milliseconds; TR, 8800 milliseconds; TI, 2200 milliseconds; NEX, 1; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz; section thickness, 5.0 mm; gap, 2.5 mm). The total scan time is 3:32 minutes.

    B, Pre-Gd T1SE images. The acquisition parameters are acquisition matrix, 256 × 192; total number of sections, 20; section thickness, 5.0 mm; section gap, 2.5 mm; FOV, 24 cm × 18 cm; TE, 14 milliseconds; TR, 500 milliseconds; NEX, 2; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz. The total scan time is 2:28 minutes.

    C, Post-Gd PS-T1IR images. The acquisition parameters are acquisition matrix, 256 × 192; total number of sections, 19; section thickness, 5.0 mm; gap, 2.5 mm; FOV, 24 cm × 24 cm; TE, 11.5 milliseconds; TR, 2250 milliseconds; TI, 430 milliseconds; NEX, 1; receiver bandwidth, 15.63 kHz. The scan time is 1:25 minutes.

    D, Post-Gd T1SE images acquired with identical parameters as the precontrast images in B. Notice the motion-induced degradation of the images acquired with the T2 FLAIR and T1SE sequences.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Pre- and postcontrast PS-T1IR (A, B) and T1SE images (C, D) from a 70-year-old male stroke patient. The slightly better margin definition of Gd-enhanced stroke (lower right corner of the image) on the T1SE image compared with the PS-T1IR image can be appreciated on these images; however, the lesion definition is superior on the PS-T1IR images. The top Gd-enhancement for PS-T1IR and T1SE (upper right corner of the image) are quite comparable because of the dark background. Note a slight mismatch between the pre- and postcontrast images because of the patient movement. The acquisition parameters for the (PS-T1IR, T1SE) images were TE, (12, 17) milliseconds; TR, (2184, 516) milliseconds; TI, (430, n/a) milliseconds; echo train length, (6, n/a); echo spacing, (11.4, n/a) milliseconds; NEX, (1, 2). The same values for FOV (24 cm × 24 cm), section thickness (5 mm, skip 2.5 mm), and acquisition matrix (256 × 192) were used for both the sequences.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Imaging contrast efficiency

    TechniquePS-T1IRT1FLAIRT1SE
    Scan time2 min 33 s2 min 38 s3 min 28 s
    η121.159 ± 0.0860.729 ± 0.1690.232 ± 0.115
    P0.00100.0000
    η150.908 ± 0.1740.398 ± 0.1520.120 ± 0.118
    P0.00120.0000
    η321.198 ± 0.0920.729 ± 0.1600.156 ± 0.151
    P0.00050.0000
    η450.816 ± 0.1470.407 ± 0.2760.097 ± 0.099
    P0.01930.0000
    η421.067 ± 0.1110.738 ± 0.1640.209 ± 0.125
    P0.00590.000
    • *The P value is from the Student t-test for unequal samples relative to PS-T1IR. The values are mean ± sd. 1 indicates corpus callosum, forceps minor; 2, caudate nucleus, head; 3, corpus callosum, genu; 4, internal capsule, genu; and 5, putamen.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 6
1 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase-Sensitive T1 Inversion Recovery Imaging: A Time-Efficient Interleaved Technique for Improved Tissue Contrast in Neuroimaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Ping Hou, Khader M. Hasan, Clark W. Sitton, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Ponnada A. Narayana
Phase-Sensitive T1 Inversion Recovery Imaging: A Time-Efficient Interleaved Technique for Improved Tissue Contrast in Neuroimaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1432-1438;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Phase-Sensitive T1 Inversion Recovery Imaging: A Time-Efficient Interleaved Technique for Improved Tissue Contrast in Neuroimaging
Ping Hou, Khader M. Hasan, Clark W. Sitton, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Ponnada A. Narayana
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1432-1438;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition, Quality Assurance, and Quality Check for the Accelerator Program for Discovery in Brain Disorders using Stem Cells
  • Evaluating Tissue Contrast and Detecting White Matter Injury in the Infant Brain: A Comparison Study of Synthetic Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery
  • A 3T Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery MRI Sequence Improves Detection of Cervical Spinal Cord Lesions and Shows Active Lesions in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Synthetic MRI in the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Plaques
  • Improved detection of cortical MS lesions with phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire