Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Minimizing Clip Artifacts in Multi CT Angiography of Clipped Patients

I. van der Schaaf, M. van Leeuwen, A. Vlassenbroek and B. Velthuis
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2006, 27 (1) 60-66;
I. van der Schaaf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. van Leeuwen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Vlassenbroek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Velthuis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE: To optimize the multi CTA (MSCTA) protocol, the influence of pitch, kilovoltage peak (kVp), reconstruction algorithm, type, and orientation of the clip on clip-induced artifacts was investigated in a phantom study. Also, the influence of kVp, concentration of contrast material, and clip orientation in clipped patients was studied.

METHODS: A phantom containing a clip was scanned with varying parameters. Artifact was quantified with 3D volumetry. Artifact volumes were compared for the different parameters. In addition, the number of artifact streaks was presented as a function of the pitch. Five clipped patients were scanned with 90 kVp and 120 kVp and 5 with 120 kVp and 140 kVp. The artifact area was compared. The visualization at the clip site was evaluated for different clip orientations in 50 patients, and for 140 kVp with 370 mg iodine/mL contrast (I/mL) compared with 120 kVp/300 mg I/mL in 7 patients.

RESULTS: Up to a pitch of 0.6, there was hardly an increase in artifact. Higher kVp and linear interpolation resulted in fewer artifacts. Alloy clips containing cobalt produced more artifact than did titanium clips. Clips positioned perpendicular to the scan plane led to significantly less artifact. In patients with clips, scanning with 140 kVp/370 mgI/mL led to a decrease of artifact area and a better visualization of the clip site. The visualization at the clip site was also better for clips perpendicular to the scan plane.

CONCLUSIONS: If clip artifacts are to be minimized, we suggest scanning with a pitch of 0.6, by using 140 kVp and 370 mgI/mL contrast.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 1
January, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimizing Clip Artifacts in Multi CT Angiography of Clipped Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
I. van der Schaaf, M. van Leeuwen, A. Vlassenbroek, B. Velthuis
Minimizing Clip Artifacts in Multi CT Angiography of Clipped Patients
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 60-66;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Minimizing Clip Artifacts in Multi CT Angiography of Clipped Patients
I. van der Schaaf, M. van Leeuwen, A. Vlassenbroek, B. Velthuis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 60-66;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom
  • Feasibility of Flat Panel Angiographic CT after Intravenous Contrast Agent Application in the Postoperative Evaluation of Patients with Clipped Aneurysms
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire